Okay, I've discussed the situation with Becky and she's pointed out how the other thread appears to read. Here are some facts, so we can get everyone on the same page:
Iceman31x brake-tested another driver. First offence, normally would result in a warning or a caution. The admin who processed the report decided to award a short-term ban as a "wake-up", as well as a caution. When I came to review the report, I figured Mike had had his wake-up, and unbanned him. The caution for the offence remains and Mike has a severe points penalty and an infraction to show for it. Case closed.
Entirely separate from the report is the question of who is using Iceman31x's licence, but you need to subdivide that into CTRA licence and LFS licence. It was established in PMs very early on that it was Mike who was driving at the time of the offence. It was also established very early that Mike defends his CTRA licence from his dad as much as humanly possible.
There is no evidence anywhere to show that Mike's dad has been upping his CTRA licence on his behalf (and lots of evidence to the contrary). I'm also firmly of the belief that Mike's licence is *more at risk* from his dad than it is ever likely to benefit.
Lastly, the official moderator position - Mike and his dad can legitimately share the LFS licence, in the same house and on up to two separate PCs. In this particular instance, Mike and his dad are on a shared PC and so there is absolutely no risk to the S2 licence name Iceman31x.
I hope that this answers all outstanding questions. If anyone really feels the need to discuss or ask more questions, please do so in PM to me.