As topic says, I really doesn`t understand that point and ranking system. Currently I`m ranked as #100, and 2th in Norway.
Today I talked with the man ranked as #1 in Norway, and neighter one of us did understand why he almost had 30 000 points while I has aprox 20 000. By looking on the stats I have raced over 6 times more races than he, won more, etc etc, still he has 10 000 points more than me. It`s probally just me that is silly, but can anyone please explain to me why some of the top racers of CTRA seems to have races close to nothing, THO they have hell of a lot of points?
And btw, it`s not meant as critisice or me beeing jelous on them, I`m just wondering since it makes no sence to me. The ones that have races most and won most should have most point?
Today I talked with the man ranked as #1 in Norway, and neighter one of us did understand why he almost had 30 000 points while I has aprox 20 000. By looking on the stats I have raced over 6 times more races than he, won more, etc etc, still he has 10 000 points more than me. It`s probally just me that is silly, but can anyone please explain to me why some of the top racers of CTRA seems to have races close to nothing, THO they have hell of a lot of points?
And btw, it`s not meant as critisice or me beeing jelous on them, I`m just wondering since it makes no sence to me. The ones that have races most and won most should have most point?