I've never seen a single seater with a neutral button or anything of the sort that allows you to go directly to neutral without shifting down/up or whatever.
Nor do I really see any purpose to be completely honest.
It wouldn't really be useful, I mean, how many times do you go from 6th gear all the way down to neutral? Surely when stopping you don't go from 150mph to 0mph? Besides, you can of course pull in the clutch and go down from 6th to neutral
To be fair to him (I am fair, when it's deserved ), F1 cars do have an N button to jump to neutral. It might even be regulated, so that cars can be pushed by marshalls easily.
A neutral button would probably be realistic:
a) In a sequential gearbox (I only know bikes' gearboxes) you can shift "between" the gears, where you end up in neutral, and
b) with the h-pattern you can always immeadiatly shift into neutral,
so the neutral-button might be a good idea.
I'm not sure how you shift into neutral on sequential gearboxes but I think a neutral button (that works on all cars for those of us who sequentially shift road cars) would be a nice touch but more importantly if it was the only way to get into neutral so you couldn't accidentally end up in neutral.
In bike gearboxes there is a neutral between 1st and 2nd (which is why bike 'boxes are usually written as 1 down, 5 up), not between each gear.
In real racing there is no regulation about jumping to neutral that I know of, but I'd guess that most have some sort of system. A conventional, mechanical sequential doesn't need a system, as you just pull the levers around until neutral is found, but a hydraulic system would need a fail-safe neutral button in case of hydraulic failure (either by the engine not running, or by mechanical fault).
Well, in bike gearboxes, some have "neutral" between every two gears, some don't. But that "netural" isn't really neutral. It's just some void that you fall into if you mis-shfited. I've ridden bikes with and without it.
How a sequential can mechanically jump from any gear to neutral is beyond me... Or is it just a pre-programmed sequential shifting back to neutral? All of F1's shifting goes through the computer anyway.
On my bike, there is a "false neutral", as its called, between every gear. It happens on every shift, unless I get off the bike and kick the lever with quite a bit of force .
Every bike has them, but in some bikes they're not noticable. Obviously, the MRT most definatly should not have them, as the gear up/down selector is a button. If it was made analogue, then maybe we could have them...
I've never used a real sequential (apart from bike gearboxes), but presumably there is some sort of "escape" emergency gear in the box, that is disengaged when the neutral button is pressed. This would allow marshals to engage neutral when pushing a car. That's just my thinking, I don't know...
I've never ridden a bike with false neutrals between the gears, except on one bike that had a badly worn gear selector (probably caused by a chap called dougie riding it in the past and knackering the 'box)
yes, have a neutural and reverse buttons for if you select sequential box (like when you have a DFP!)
Sorry, I started another thread about this, didn't see this one, but it really does the same thing, prevent people from shifting to neutural or reverse if they use sequential transmission.