I won't take your expression literally (I've seen some pretty nasty malware) but yes, Symantec stuff is known to be troublesome, buggy, extremely hungry on resources, and on top of that there's the annoying fact of having very slow and sometimes poor virus signature releases when compared to the Antiviruses which are generally respected in the security community (such as NOD32, Kaspersky, F-Secure).
Every security suite/product may be troublesome, but I have had much more trouble with Symantec products (and much more infections) than with any other non-free antivirus.
Edit: my personal position on antiviruses is that they are flawed by design. The now late Holy Father, author of one of the best rootkits ever (Hacker Defender), had a similar position. However for those who aren't savvy enough to use a proactive approach (and that is the absolute majority of users) it's a form of necessary evil.