The online racing simulator
Super Pi Mod
1
3
567891011
(251 posts, started )
#51 - Roadie
#52 - (FIN)Eza
Quote from Roadie :Orthos/prime stable?

3.6GhZ yop, didn't test 3.8GhZ so that aint counted
#53 - Btoryo
I don't know what this is but whatever.
Attached images
Superpi.png
#54 - Takumi_lfs
#55 - kaynd
12.391s
Intel Core2Duo E6600@4106MHz - biostar Tforce 965PT - supertalent T800UX2GC5 4 4 4 12 @ 912mhz - watercooled
http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=493259#post493259

 I did this benchmark 1year ago when i first got my C2D6600 and decided to find it's limits (not really good core code cause with a capable watercooling system like mine it should go higher)

Anyway nowdays it is a piece of cake to drop below 10sec with an Intel Quad core.
#56 - Jakg
Quote from kaynd :Anyway nowdays it is a piece of cake to drop below 10sec with an Intel Quad core.

How so? Quad's aren't great for SuperPi, as SuperPi only uses 1 core.
Quote from Roadie :3.4Ghz
945mhz (5-5-5-15)

EDIT: Yeah, I used to get 14's in XP.

Yeah i stand no chance of beating that lol.

Quote from rc10racer :Amd 6000+ @ 3.36

Wha?! I get high 27's with a single core 3700 @ 3.07 GHz, and that was with DDR1...!
#57 - kaynd
Quote from Jakg :How so? Quad's aren't great for SuperPi, as SuperPi only uses 1 core.

don't really have a clue about that... i do know that Super pi uses only one core but latest intel's quad core seem to be more effective clock per clock or it is just cause of the better chipset+ DDR3 ram...
#58 - MataGyula
Here's mine super piiii time , done with a good ol' Athlon XP 2800+ running @ 2088 MHz . Screenie attached ( containing just the necessary information and not my whole desktop ... posers )
Attached images
meh.JPG
#59 - evilgenius
02m 13.862s 1M and 04.186s 16K . Is my final result, no need to post screenshot for such a slow result ? :P
#60 - Yaamboo
I got 1 minute 16.485 seconds with my Athlon XP 2200+ running at stock speed, 1800 MHz.
#61 - DieKolkrabe
Mine...

000h 00m 49.953s

I guess it's slow

DK
#62 - baSh0r
My one

AMD Athlon X2 6000+ @ 3015MHZ
Club 3D ATI 2900 XT HD 512MB DDR RAM
Crucial Ballistix D9GMH Micron 2GB Kit

Programs running:

ICQ, MSN, Firefox
Attached images
Image2.png
#63 - Jakg
Quote from kaynd :don't really have a clue about that... i do know that Super pi uses only one core but latest intel's quad core seem to be more effective clock per clock or it is just cause of the better chipset+ DDR3 ram...

Aha yes, didn't think of that.

You can run a C2D on an x48 or x38 chipset, with DDR3 though.

It's only the Penryn Quads that are like that, and soon there will be Dual Core versions. Seeing as the Quads are hitting 6 GHz, i think something might be challenging the 8.1 GHz P4 record...
#64 - GloryJ
Core 2 Duo E6420 and crappy windows XP
I'll post the result of super pi under gentoo linux tomorrow.
Attached images
pi.jpg
-
(yozzer) DELETED by yozzer
#65 - Roadie
updated the list.. I think i got everyone so far.
#66 - yozzer
Mine
Attached images
pi.JPG
#67 - hardcoreobscure
Heres mine.

Running an AMD Athlon 3400+ with 1Gb

Upgrading soon
Attached images
pi.PNG
#68 - GloryJ
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Fri Jan 4 12:29:04 GMT 2008
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.272 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.794 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.899 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.902 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.902 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.897 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.901 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.903 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.899 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.906 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.911 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.901 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.903 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.896 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.886 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.871 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.846 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.787 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 17.772 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.117 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 17.889( 0.643) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Jan 4 12:29:22 GMT 2008

Linux gloryj_desktop 2.6.22-gentoo-r8 #10 SMP Wed Oct 24 11:12:42 GMT 2007 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6420 @ 2.13GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Nearly 5 seconds faster then the Windows version of super pi
#69 - Takumi_lfs
Quote from hardcoreobscure :Heres mine.

Running an AMD Athlon 3400+ with 1Gb

Upgrading soon

Did you overclock your CPU?

I have 3500+ witch is slower than yours.
#70 - Jakg
With XP and a 3700 i got the same time, when running at stock (2.2 GHz)
#71 - anik360
24.172 secs on E2200 no overclock 2gb ddr2800 Vista Ultimate 32bit

edit: got 23.109 yesterday but forgot to take screenie and it seems the calculations seem less consistent at every calculation
Attached images
pi.jpg
#72 - Takumi_lfs
hmm my uncle that uses AMD 6400+ @ 3,2ghz stock has 27sec on Vista?

Is this normal?
#73 - anik360
no it must be bloat ware that is holding him back and maybe something else is giving that timing
#74 - Jakg
Quote from Takumi_lfs :hmm my uncle that uses AMD 6400+ @ 3,2ghz stock has 27sec on Vista?

Is this normal?

Yup. Considering my AMD [email protected] GHz using a tweaked copy of XP gets 27 seconds, then 3.2 GHz and Vista (which might be a bit bloated) getting the same time makes sense.
Quote from anik360 :got 23.109 yesterday but forgot to take screenie and it seems the calculations seem less consistent at every calculation

Windows does a lot of **** in the background all the time. It's not the calculation being inconsistent (if it were then surely you would get a different Pi each time...?), try doing a test with 3DMark06 - each time your score will be different for the same reason.
#75 - NitroNitrous
1
3
567891011

Super Pi Mod
(251 posts, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG