I spoke with you about this yesterday Sam, but I think I`ll need to describe it better, and open a discussion about it
I do understand the part, about saying sorry and wait, if you crashed a person. It`s a nice thing to do, and do not misunderstand me, but I got a question about it.
I saw it yesterday, when someone had an racing accident. The "guilty" said sorry, waited some and then drove. Then later he got the respons "nice, say sorry then drive" , and then it was a little bitch-mood some time before it calmed down. My question is here, if you crash someone and waits for them, but they just stands there and typing offending / agressive messages, should you just stand there wait for him? Even if he has no intension to complete the race? My point here is, sure, if both started running again it would be a nice thing to let him pass you, but sometimes when people get taken out they seems not interested in complete the race, and rather wants to blame the "Guilty" one. Is it any use in just standing there and recive offending words against you, or can you drive?
It was a lot of talk about this between the two involved, and actually, I`ll agree with the "guilty". What use is it to just stand there waiting for him, it can not undo the accident. If you say sorry, and tries to get the point out that you really didn`t mean it, is it then any use in waiting? What justice is it in that? Most cases are accidents, and both can blame themselfe, but just standing there waiting for the other to drive helps no one.
So, whats your point about this? Sure, saying sorry and just drive feels harsh, but what can you really do? Most cases are misstakes, and neighter one of the invovled wanted the result to be that. I don`t think it`s any more "nice" or sportman like to just stop there, and wait for the one in the gravvel to deside running.
Still, I mean that people should let the man, if they hit someone off the track, to let him pass, but sometimes there is no use for that, if the one invovled has no wish in completing the race.
I do understand the part, about saying sorry and wait, if you crashed a person. It`s a nice thing to do, and do not misunderstand me, but I got a question about it.
I saw it yesterday, when someone had an racing accident. The "guilty" said sorry, waited some and then drove. Then later he got the respons "nice, say sorry then drive" , and then it was a little bitch-mood some time before it calmed down. My question is here, if you crash someone and waits for them, but they just stands there and typing offending / agressive messages, should you just stand there wait for him? Even if he has no intension to complete the race? My point here is, sure, if both started running again it would be a nice thing to let him pass you, but sometimes when people get taken out they seems not interested in complete the race, and rather wants to blame the "Guilty" one. Is it any use in just standing there and recive offending words against you, or can you drive?
It was a lot of talk about this between the two involved, and actually, I`ll agree with the "guilty". What use is it to just stand there waiting for him, it can not undo the accident. If you say sorry, and tries to get the point out that you really didn`t mean it, is it then any use in waiting? What justice is it in that? Most cases are accidents, and both can blame themselfe, but just standing there waiting for the other to drive helps no one.
So, whats your point about this? Sure, saying sorry and just drive feels harsh, but what can you really do? Most cases are misstakes, and neighter one of the invovled wanted the result to be that. I don`t think it`s any more "nice" or sportman like to just stop there, and wait for the one in the gravvel to deside running.
Still, I mean that people should let the man, if they hit someone off the track, to let him pass, but sometimes there is no use for that, if the one invovled has no wish in completing the race.