The main reason Ickx and Bell have so many wins between them is Porsche. The main reason Kristensen has so many wins is Audi. I realise it's a different challenge, but the emphasis is on the car, not the driver.
agreed, f1 champ, indy 500 winner and nascar daytona 500 winner, daytona 24 hour winner,3 times sebring 12 hour winner, pike peak hill climb winner, 4 times "champ" car champion, pole position for his first F1 race, 2nd and a 3rd at le mans, drove works ferrari in sports car races co driving with jacky ickx,
Don't forget that Ickx drove in F1 before his endurance racing career. Even before F1, he raced motorcycles, touring cars, and sports cars. He won Le Mans with Ford and Mirage before driving Porsches. Furthermore, he won the Bathurst 1000, and the Dakar rally.
As for Bell, he raced F3, F2, and eventually F1, before his sports car career.
Kristensen competed in karts and F3, was a F1 test driver, and also competed in BTCC. He's no push-over when it comes to racing.
Indeed, quite a number of Le Mans racers have had competitive histories in junior formula racing, and some got their toe across to F1 as well. No matter what people might say, you don't get an F1 drive unless you have outstanding talent, attested by the fact that even most F1 rejects are quite competitive later in their motorsport careers.
Although I agree that Le Mans series have a great deal of emphasis on cars and their technology, you shouldn't underestimate the talent of successful Le Mans racers.
I'd say in terms of overall driver skill, most Le Mans racers would be comparable to racers in second-tier formulae (F3000, GP2, WSBR, Formula Nippon, etc.) and national-level touring car championships, with the top Le Mans drivers equalling those of F1 and Champ Cars.
JV's footprint is nowhere close to Mario Andretti, but personally, I think JV was a fabulous driver to watch when he is in his prime, may not be the greatest/most versitle/efficient driver but as a person, on having fun in life, he is pretty much as good as you can hope for.
That implies that you never know who'll win in NASCAR and wouldn't that be more exciting than a single guy that leads the entire race with a 2 minute lead?
And main reason for Schumacher's latter 6 championships is Ferrari?
You need to go couple of decades back in time to find motorsport (excluding spec series) that was primarily about the driver and then about the machinery.
But I guess F1 is still the primary goal/dream for every junior driver (at least on this side of the Atlantic). To a point - because nowadays "tintop" and single-seater drivers don't swap between the classes unlike in the good old days, so after a driver chooses to go for sports cars there's usually no coming back to single-seaters.
Aside from Villeneuve, Peugeot has gathered quite a collection of "F1 rejects" to fill their 3 cars in this year's race; Marc Gene, Pedro Lamy, Wurz, Montagny (first LM24 in 1998), Zonta and Christian Klien. Wurz is not exactly a reject though, still don't understand how he just decided to quit (even that later he explained he had no motivation and test driving is what he enjoys more :really.
I don't think Wurz was ever really cut out to be a race driver at the top level. He's a very fine driver, but seems to lack the racer instinct that more competitive F1 drivers have.
Oh there is no doubt that F1 is the ultimate goal of almost any aspiring racer who earns a FR or F3 seat.
Unfortunately the nature of modern racing contracts mean cross-pollination between disciplines just can't be done unless a driver retires, or are still in the "up and coming" stage of their career. Even at F3 level, some contracts stipulate that a driver cannot participate in more than 2 races outside of the contracted championship.
There are exceptions, of course. Look at Sebastien Loeb: he competed in both WRC and the 24 hours of Le Mans in 2005 and 2006.