Hi,
before i start, this is what i've done to find an answer to my question. unfortunately without success:
searched the forum, searched myctra for a possibility to appeal, searched members list for a guy called d00f.

Now here's my question.
A report i raised was dismissed because of a blatant misunderstanding. To prevent further misunderstandings i'll provide a little more information without discussing the report here.

This is what happend:
1. we are driving with highspeed next to each other.
2. we make a very slight contact. definetly a normal racing incident.
3. he crashes. i do not.
4. he calls me a _<censored>_ and disconnects.

I reported that. Admin response: racing incident, made worse by lag ---> dismissed (10956)

Of course i was _not_ reporting the contact our cars made. I reported him _insulting_ me.

What is the next step to do? Raise the same report again? Send a pm to somebody? Any ideas?

greetz
euru

Watched #10956. Nothing special to see.
Maybe wrong replay selected..?! http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?p=732465#post732465

Hi euru,

For the first time in a long time I've a spare moment, so I'll go have a poke around and see what's going on.

thank you guys for dealing with it. highly appreciated.

Just as a quick reminder to everyone, it is not strictly against the rules to swear in CTRA servers. However, the following considerations must be observed at all times:-

1. You may not direct personal abuse towards other members at all, at any time.
   
2. You must always be aware that younger drivers may witness the language you use at ANY time of the day, due to the international popularity of the CTRA servers. It is the CTRA admins' preference that the servers be kept as child-friendly as possible.
   
3. The CTRA uses a language filter to assist in moderating the language used in servers. However, circumventing the filter in order to abuse other drivers while avoiding being kicked is regarded by CTRA admins as pre-meditated abuse of both other drivers and also the system, and is dealt with accordingly when reported.

I'll go ahead and close this thread since, as I understand it, the report has been revisited by Chris.