FZR having H is quite reasonable because FZR-like Porsche's previous GT2-class model (996 GT3 RS??) had one in 2005. Since then it finally got seqential afaik. And even then it was the only major* model to have H-pattern in GT2.
* excludes those random apparitions like Morgan Aero etc.
You can't be serious.
You mean BMW M3 GTR? The BMWs in WTCC still has H-pattern. Might be a cost thing too. Or when they have perfected it, why try to fix it if they don't feel that it's disadvantage.
You have already said this.
I'd like too if time just went back 30 years and drivers would need to be real men again. But LFS is trying to represent modern day racing, and I see it from that point of view.
The Porsches were all customer cars, built by private teams to whatever specification they wanted. 911s have largely run with sequential gearboxes for years, including the Cup cars. It's only due to their popularity with privateers that H-pattern 911s still exist.
The only Morgan Aero 8 to be used in competition with an H-pattern gearbox was a completely standard one that raced in the Morgan Challenge. All the GT cars have used sequential 'boxes.
Absolutely. A lot of the changes made to racing cars are for cosmetic reasons.
Don't the touring cars have different weight limits for different gearboxes though? I'd also have said that for short races in very easy to drive cars the driver endurance/engagement factor is less important than out right lap speed.
LFS currently simulates a rather broad age range, the road cars are mostly somewhat dated, lighter and less powerful and far more fun to drive than current cars.