Depends who builds it..
They already doing it, have been for some time and all this is, is a way of actually using that information awareness that they have been gathering for years.
The Total Information Awareness project..
Half the so called ''free speech" or "free press" on the internet is them..they control both the "for" and "against"
Best, Maz
And they get all their information from Facebook- knowledge is powah!
Of course, if you control the internet then the following is even more likely. It is, after all, one of the few sources of information that isn't controlled by the FOX, Murdoch etc cabal.
Naturally, despite the fact that this is recorded commentary, excerts downloadable with the provided links, I fully believe that it's completely false and just yet another conspiracy theory. I'm sure the US VP would never say this.
I completely trust and believe in the US administration.
I LOVE YOU BIG BROTHER.
In another exchange, after assuring that comments are "off the record," Rumsfeld and one of the military analysts agree that Iraq could use a "Syngman Rhee" to take control of Iraq. Syngman Rhee was the ruthless authoritarian dictator of South Korea from after World War II through the Korean War to 1960. If the invasion of Iraq was about liberating the Iraqis from a tyrant in the form of Saddam Hussein why is Rumsfeld talking about installing an even more brutal dictator?
Click here for the audio clip. Newsvine has the recording in full."
Naturally, despite the fact that this is recorded commentary, excerts downloadable with the provided links, I fully believe that it's completely false and just yet another conspiracy theory. I'm sure the US VP would never say this.
I completely trust and believe in the US administration.
I LOVE YOU BIG BROTHER.
"The most extraordinary exchange takes place when Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong bemoans shrinking political support for Neo-Con war plans on Capitol Hill and suggests that sympathy for the Bush administration's agenda will only be achieved after a new terror attack.
Rumsfeld agrees that the psychological impact of 9/11 is wearing off and the "behavior pattern" of citizens in both the U.S. and Europe suggests that they are unconcerned about the threat of terror.
Rumsfeld agrees that the psychological impact of 9/11 is wearing off and the "behavior pattern" of citizens in both the U.S. and Europe suggests that they are unconcerned about the threat of terror.
Click here for the audio clip.DELONG: Politically, what are the challenges because you're not going to have a lot of sympathetic ears up there until it [a terror attack] happens.
RUMSFELD: That's what I was just going to say. This President's pretty much a victim of success. We haven't had an attack in five years. The perception of the threat is so low in this society that it's not surprising that the behavior pattern reflects a low threat assessment. The same thing's in Europe, there's a low threat perception. The correction for that, I suppose, is an attack. And when that happens, then everyone gets energized for another [inaudible] and it's a shame we don't have the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats...the lethality, the carnage, that can be imposed on our society is so real and so present and so serious that you'd think we'd be able to understand it, but as a society, the longer you get away from 9/11, the less...the less...
In another exchange, after assuring that comments are "off the record," Rumsfeld and one of the military analysts agree that Iraq could use a "Syngman Rhee" to take control of Iraq. Syngman Rhee was the ruthless authoritarian dictator of South Korea from after World War II through the Korean War to 1960. If the invasion of Iraq was about liberating the Iraqis from a tyrant in the form of Saddam Hussein why is Rumsfeld talking about installing an even more brutal dictator?
Click here for the audio clip. Newsvine has the recording in full."
You know... all "left wing conspiracy" stuff thrown out, You still have something there to think about. Cyber warfare.
I think That type of capability is going to be an equalizing factor in future conflicts. I'm pretty sure most of the major players on the planet havev some sort of computer defense/offense strategy. At least the guy on our team is up front and honest about it.
I mean, you blow up the enemy's factories to prevent them from building tanks, you blow up their communications to keep them from relaying orders, The internet is simply the next logical target. I think it sucks though, there might be accidental attacks or a hacker takes over a country's cyber-weapons and uses them for whatever reason.
and where as it takes some doing to make a nuke, setting up the ultimate attack computer would be cheaper, eventually that technology would filter down and becomes available to just about any kid with a VISA gift card.
LOL some kid lost his bandos god sword in runescape, so he shuts down the entire pacific rim for two weeks until the UN gets the mods to give it back to him.
It's kinda scary when you think about it that way.
I think That type of capability is going to be an equalizing factor in future conflicts. I'm pretty sure most of the major players on the planet havev some sort of computer defense/offense strategy. At least the guy on our team is up front and honest about it.
I mean, you blow up the enemy's factories to prevent them from building tanks, you blow up their communications to keep them from relaying orders, The internet is simply the next logical target. I think it sucks though, there might be accidental attacks or a hacker takes over a country's cyber-weapons and uses them for whatever reason.
and where as it takes some doing to make a nuke, setting up the ultimate attack computer would be cheaper, eventually that technology would filter down and becomes available to just about any kid with a VISA gift card.
LOL some kid lost his bandos god sword in runescape, so he shuts down the entire pacific rim for two weeks until the UN gets the mods to give it back to him.
It's kinda scary when you think about it that way.
The problem is though, what if whatever terrorist organisation you're interested in shutting down isn't using the internet to move around its information? There are a million other ways to get a message across, and there are enough security holes in the net already that any large terrorist organisation worth its salt would necessarily want to avoid it.
Quite so, the Guild of Calamitous Intent has already issued memos to its members long time ago.
Everything is
Imagine a country where strangers have the right to ask intrusive questions and store the answers on a database. Where everyone from police officers to leisure-centre staff can demand: "Tell me who you feel close to?"
They will also have been trained to ask questions about sexual behaviour, family life, religion, secret fears, weight and "sleeping arrangements" at home.
Incredibly, thousands of Government and council apparatchiks in Britain became entitled on April 1 to ask such questions of anyone under 19.
Scroll down for more...
Far too PC: Police officers say having to question youngsters about their diet is 'insane'
This horrifying invasion of privacy has begun, almost unnoticed, because the Government has cleverly presented it as being in the interests of "child protection".
The new questionnaire, known as the Common Assessment Framework (CAF), is part of a £20million programme called Every Child Matters (ECM), ostensibly set up to ensure youngsters are safe and leading positive lives.
Professionals - such as police officers, teachers and doctors - and volunteers are now under orders to subject children to a questionnaire if they consider them "at risk": a definition so broad that many decent parents could find themselves labelled as potential abusers.
The questions don't need a parent's consent since any child over 12 is deemed responsible enough to grant permission for an interview.
Any child not achieving the Government's five "outcomes" - being healthy, staying safe, enjoying life, "making a positive contribution", and achieving " economic well-being" - is now defined as having "additional needs".
How did this idiocy come about? Margaret Hodge announced the ECM agenda in 2003, just after Tony Blair ignored his friend's unsavoury history as leader of Islington Council during one of Britain's worst child-abuse scandals and, to widespread protest, made her Children's Minister.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pag ... 67003&in_page_id=1770
They will also have been trained to ask questions about sexual behaviour, family life, religion, secret fears, weight and "sleeping arrangements" at home.
Incredibly, thousands of Government and council apparatchiks in Britain became entitled on April 1 to ask such questions of anyone under 19.
Scroll down for more...
Far too PC: Police officers say having to question youngsters about their diet is 'insane' This horrifying invasion of privacy has begun, almost unnoticed, because the Government has cleverly presented it as being in the interests of "child protection".
The new questionnaire, known as the Common Assessment Framework (CAF), is part of a £20million programme called Every Child Matters (ECM), ostensibly set up to ensure youngsters are safe and leading positive lives.
Professionals - such as police officers, teachers and doctors - and volunteers are now under orders to subject children to a questionnaire if they consider them "at risk": a definition so broad that many decent parents could find themselves labelled as potential abusers.
The questions don't need a parent's consent since any child over 12 is deemed responsible enough to grant permission for an interview.
Any child not achieving the Government's five "outcomes" - being healthy, staying safe, enjoying life, "making a positive contribution", and achieving " economic well-being" - is now defined as having "additional needs".
How did this idiocy come about? Margaret Hodge announced the ECM agenda in 2003, just after Tony Blair ignored his friend's unsavoury history as leader of Islington Council during one of Britain's worst child-abuse scandals and, to widespread protest, made her Children's Minister.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pag ... 67003&in_page_id=1770
It really should never of been given to the public.
But that's why the United States government has a second 'internet' just for the military, so that would make this just posturing.
1
2
Don't Panic, Just be very, very scared ........
(35 posts, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG