It sounds weird because you're moving in a completely unnatural way in SHIFT+U mode. You're flying at great speed and with almost infinite acceleration up to and down from speed. That does not mean it's wrong.
It sounds weird because you're moving in a completely unnatural way in SHIFT+U mode. You're flying at great speed and with almost infinite acceleration up to and down from speed. That does not mean it's wrong.
Yeah, decrease the car shine. Try it with 0.30.
Help.
What is the best way back to y19 or even y from y22.
I have a machine that does not support HVS and frame rate is much decreased in MPR online. Please advise, racing tomorrow..
Best, Maz
What is the best way back to y19 or even y from y22.
I have a machine that does not support HVS and frame rate is much decreased in MPR online. Please advise, racing tomorrow..
Best, Maz
If you have Y22 installed, maybe replacing LFS.exe with that of the Y19 one might be enough. I'm not sure if there's been changes to the data files for it though 
well they brightened whn i set 0.50
The AI can drive LX4 on rallycross, but not LX6? And why not the RAC either? They both have rallycross tyres
Yeah, I hear what you're saying, but when do people use shift-u? Mostly when making videos, right? And IMO, for that, the old way it sounded was much better than the new one.
It changed? I haven't noticed anything different, but then I rarely fly around in SHIFT+U.
Either way though, some weirdness when flying around at speed is better than the alternative in my opinion (no Doppler). That would just sound wrong when the camera is standing still and cars are flying past it.
Thanks...that worked.
But, ive lost the sky. Does not show in game.
How can i get the sky back
Best, Maz
Step controls could also have buttons on replay interface... in case newbies dont read keyboard commands =/
how do you loose a sky?
remove the widescreen thing
That was a bug with Y19 if I remember correctly...
You have to disable the widescreen effect IIRC.
Thanks AndroidXP
That is exactly what you have to do. Fixed, many thanks!
Maybe a edit to the main post re this patch is needed for Graphic processors that do not support HVS. When using on board graphics processing that do not support HVS this patch severely limits performance.
Best, Maz
I think you should consider getting a cheap graphics card, partly because sooner or later there will be the final Z patch, and you will have to have it.
Cards that are powerful enough for LFS aren't expensive at all, like the 6600GT.
Hell, I average 150 FPS with a 9800 PRO, all settings maxed
That card is almost 5 years old
There's a buy it now one on Ebay for €30
That card is almost 5 years old
There's a buy it now one on Ebay for €30
Could you tell me how the hell you manage to get avarage 150 FPS with a 9800 Pro, all settings maxed? By all settings I mean max LOD at LFS everywhere, multiplayer speedup at off, 6X AA, 16XAF, high res skins, High Quality AF, texture and mipmap driver settings. I had a 9800 pro for 2,5 years, now I have a X1650Pro(I know it's not a very fast card) but I can easily bring down my FPS to 15 with these settings at 1440x900 screen resolution. Personally I can't see how it is possible to have 150 FPS avarage unless you use extremely low resolution and hacked drivers, like Omega which turns down quality like hell.
I had a 9800 Pro for about three years, and I never managed to get more than 60fps with everything on, usually a bit less.
You have a mutant card
Everything in LFS up full, hi-res textures (only installed 'em last night though), 4x AA, 2x AF. Any higher AA/AF is unnoticeable for me, but still lowers FPS.
I use Omega drivers. Very light overclocking (stock is 324/290, I'm using 350/320). 1024x768 resolution though, I'm using a TV as a monitor
When I say average, I'm taking into account all different tracks. On Aston, for instance, I can easily get 180 FPS. But in South City, with a nice few cars on screen, it can go down to 50. It generally averages out at around 150 since the new patch With lots of cars on screen (~20) it will obviously go down to ~50 FPS, but during normal circumstances, maybe 4/5 cars on screen, it will manage about 120.
I do have 4GB RAM and a 3.5Ghz processor though, maybe that has something to do with it
I use Omega drivers. Very light overclocking (stock is 324/290, I'm using 350/320). 1024x768 resolution though, I'm using a TV as a monitor
When I say average, I'm taking into account all different tracks. On Aston, for instance, I can easily get 180 FPS. But in South City, with a nice few cars on screen, it can go down to 50. It generally averages out at around 150 since the new patch
With lots of cars on screen (~20) it will obviously go down to ~50 FPS, but during normal circumstances, maybe 4/5 cars on screen, it will manage about 120.I do have 4GB RAM and a 3.5Ghz processor though, maybe that has something to do with it
That's it.
I just run some checks before and after test patch;
Loaded up AS National, put the maximum ammount of AI drivers on the track so I was just watching them race.
Before patch I was 15-60 fps
After patch I am 24-60 fps
I have vert sync on, AA8X/AF16X @ 1280X1024 so yea, great increase in FPS from a little update like that...nice one
Loaded up AS National, put the maximum ammount of AI drivers on the track so I was just watching them race.
Before patch I was 15-60 fps
After patch I am 24-60 fps
I have vert sync on, AA8X/AF16X @ 1280X1024 so yea, great increase in FPS from a little update like that...nice one
Just a thought. What about a multiplayer setup-lock option, so everybody only can use the standard setup, or make it partially lockable, for instance lockable suspension, gearbox/diff, tires and such
Is it just me, or does LFS not support AA now or something? Pre- Y22 I was all excited with my new video card because I could put 8xs AA and everything was amazing. Now, the jaggies are back and are an eyesore.
Im going to reinstall 19 to see if it's just me.
Im going to reinstall 19 to see if it's just me.
Yes, since Y14.
This thread is closed
Test Patch Y22 : Faster and Smoother
(381 posts, closed, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG