Well, maybe true but I have questions and I need answers. On the one occasion where I may need to ask Lerts to see his rather slanted POV on something I will ask him.
Besides, he posts such alot that it will be page after page of <this post has been blocked because this user is on your ignore list> blah blah
Totally right, go pluck your mother, sorry, free speech remember.
on other notes, black = blue = x y be xe if x is defined as a number + anomidsgvslsl _ fwe = 4? right? but what if sdvin amnd fhsehfues plus dog wig wog nog jog on to the bus stop jah? no comprende esa? sdg geefg we L ? lol ? jahibte el comon numeral 0 i am FUIRST ONE TO DO THIS CAN I HAV COOKIEZ PLEASEEEEEEE PLEASEEEE YES I AM sane caps key malfuncdfhb9odk on me soryy keyboard meds uip gjopn meee
Fair enough in spirit, but technically bollocks. Free speech only exists in real-life liberal democracies, or other government/societal systems where freedom of speech is deemed an appropriate human right. The internet is no such democracy or system, especially privately-owned bits of it like lfsforum.net. The owners of lfsforum.net set their own rules and appoint people to enforce them. But hey, I'm just riffin' on semantics here.
Still, using your "free speech" rationale, people with strong opinions about Lerts's posting should be allowed to voice them, just as much as Lerts himself is obviously free to post ... well ... whatever world-changing, paradigm-shifting discovery he's made that day. Only when peoples' opinions are inappropriately translated to actions which contravene a person's rights under the LFS forum rules (set by our benevolent dictators ) would there be a censorhip issue.
Lerts is permitted to post whatever he wants (provided it's in the appropriate section and conforms to the forum rules), but he does not have the right to not be disagreed with, argued against or simply told to shut up & bugger off. Similarly, people reading Lerts's verbal ejaculations can respond to him in any way they see fit (presuming they're aware of the potential consequences of illegal behaviour) or to simply ignore him.
For the record: I've seen, and been a member of, plenty of other forums which don't tolerate even half the random, off-topic, space-wasting bullsh|t that goes on here and they function just as well, if not a lot better ...
I don't need to fraternise with teenage girls. Notwithstanding the creepy illegality of such liaisons, this is what I prefer to have waiting for me at home:
Even if Lerts make his.. kinds of post he's posting way more contributing stuff on the forum than most of the people flaming him.
My guess is that they are sad because they can't manage to make a topic that won't be locked, so they start spamming and crying in Lerts thread to get it locked, so they can feed their selfish ego.
But seriously, there are too many morons on this forum. Bashing Lerts all over, I don't see the point of that. Your speaking about spammer etc etc, but by far you are worse than him on any points.
I know people on internett are shit, but I wouldn't belive so many of them were to find on this forum. Let's see if we meet in real life, if your that though and offensive in your language use towards other people then.
Edit : And I'm actually pretty happy today, just botters me to see all this utterly retarded comments from the same damn people from the earlier Lerts thread. You surely got much to do, spamming and flaming to get attention? I'v heared about "cry for attention", but this is seriosly retarded. Grow up, or find something else to use time on, we all know your point of veiw S14 drift, so why do you botter to come here day after day just to post rude offending post and literrary post crap?
Beats me..
And yes, of course Lerts need to be prepared, and accept that other people don't got his belifs, or want to belive them, and even post negative comment about it. But most people in this thread has allready stated that from before, do you really _need_ to say it like 2-3 times each day?
And saying something (even if it's meant as a joke) that you want to make a time travvel machine so you could beat his parrents for not using condom is just tasteless.
I actually like Lerts, tho I don't really care much for the theories or discoveries he makes, I enjoy reading them for a laugh. Their orginal and at least for me they don't harm at all. And it's all in his threads, he don't spam others topics, like some of you other people.
as long as lerts gets my message, if i'm lucky he might reply.....
