thanks for telling me baout those bke sims guys.
One more for horrible: NFSUG2 cars are too responsive, not even comparable to real life. there are no police. and the under-glow is too bright.
You are having a laugh right? All of the EA SBK games were pretty shoddy, would only really call them arcade racers TBF.
THQ's MotoGP games weren't that bad, few niggles here and there but it was good fun. The recent ones haven't changed much apart from new bikes/liveries and the tacky 'Extreme' mode.
Another really shoddy bike game is Superbike Challenge. Not a bad selection of bikes, but the whole game was just naff.
GPBikes is looking to be the best bet for a sim, it's still in it's early stages at the moment, but good thing could come from it in time.
To me, ASR is bad,and is no where near as good as NR2003. NR2003, as well as GPL, deserve to be in the "awesome" category. Both might not be new, but besides LFS, RBR, and iRacing, there isn't many "new" sims to even look at.
Actually, just make a new "legendary" category for GPL, because it deserves its own (new or not).
No, seriously. SBK 2001 with all helps disabled is one of the best sims when it comes to superbikes on real circuits (afaik you could drive superbikes in MotoGP only on weird city tracks). Yeah, of course, GPBikes is going to be the best but it's in VERY early stage of development.
And yes, again, not only my opinion
I'm trying and failing to find some consistency in these ratings. What are the criteria? If two people disagree on which is a better bike sim, who wins and why? What is the basis of this?
Who decided that Ferrari Challenge was "Good"? My opinion of it is bad, because i bought it, raced a lap, took it back to the shop for a refund
It was no Arcade/Dreamcast Ferrari Challenge, thats for sure.
Face it Sam, this guide is worthless. The ratings are all over the place, certain sims are missing (where's the legendary nascar 2003? or even GPL for that matter, which got a makeover in 2004 and still has a lot of players and new tracks being made for it, including the 44mile Targa Flori which is coming soon.) Just because a sim is a few years old doesnt suddenly make it irrelevant. I see SBK 2001 is awaiting a ranking, so why not NASCAR 03 and GPL?
We have Arca sim racing ranked far too high by anybodys standards and Kartsim seems to have been ranked without even being released.
Flightsim X is totally overrated. Graphically its better by default than FS9, but the general consensus is its been dumbed down and moved even further away from simulation than FS9. With all it's faults, FS9 is still the superior simulator, yet doesnt even get a mention.
Personally speaking X-Plane and FS9 should be in the awesome catagory and FSX should be relegated to Very Good, and thats only because the of the bling factor.
This game is just one of the best console driving games ever in my opinion its one of the few sim titles that that deserves the name sim. Click thbs to se the lap driven by myself!
Not that ndew but certainly great.
And SBK 2008 is horrible