Who said that? I indeed want a shit exciting car. Read the damn topic until you get my point.
Otherwise this is pointless arguing about stuff you don't get because you can't be arsed to read.
So? Lot's of shit cars have turbo irl and it doesn't make it turbo's fault. Come on then. Let's make yet another arguement, I can't even see the topic of this but meh?
End of discussion, the retarded ones who couldn't keep up with the xrg xrt stuff read the damn posts till you get it. ^
Where the **** did I say anything gay about turbo? I was telling about XRT. Not turbos. Seriously stop trying to come argue few hours later about same stuff you have no idea of.
I hate to tell everything multiple times so retarted ones can keep up.
@ your link aaron, I can't see any non designed for f1 car engine block used there.
look at what cars m10 is used and how old is the engine, and how much of hp it is giving out originally, and the price of this quality block... 1350hp on m10 engine block, normal block quality? pfft.
"It is a stupid idea and yes it will be like the XRTURBO, the idea of the XRG is that it is an N/A version of the XR range."
Except it wouldn't be like XRT... You just made a new arguement.
M10 engine is far from shit. You are shit.
And yes I would turbo charge it even I had M3 to look on too. I'd keep the m3 as original as I could and leave the "shitty" m10 engine to be played around.
Did you know that they used basicly the same M10 engine in formula one giving more than 1000hp?
Read my post again, I ninja edited it. Everyone not as retarted as you can see that you are wrong and trying to argue about something then noticing you are wrong.
You decide to change topic, you are wrong there too. Then you go for demo blaming.