The online racing simulator

Poll : Should it be needed more items/obstacles to make own layout?

Yes, any items/obstacles.
21
Yes, but the "smart ones" (Barrell Curve, for example).
8
I do not care about this case.
8
No, not the new ones but to make all same in all tracks.
2
No, we have already many. (It is not needed).
2
YVIS: 2, Should it be needed more items/obstacles to make own layout?
Hello, I started to make this conversation of YVIS:

YVIS means, "You Vote It" Suggestion, in there, you can vote your opinions and talk about what is would be a best way to improve any thing on LFS, or is it even needed? You Vote It!


(PLEASE: Don't say that this already suggested or that this is not needed. I am trying to make good talk about YVIS - Questions with poll, which is telling your opinion and so on. Thank You)

This is not founded on similar threads anyway, This have got some talk about this case before.

Question 2: Should it be needed more items/obstacles to make own layout?

Why this is needed?
= Well, Most of Racers in LFS Community likes to make their layouts and showing to others or releasing to use for everyone. Usually I have seen and heard that they need more different items and obstacles, just to create their new ideas, and making fresh new autocross layouts, or even to make for example: to Aston... a cruise layout or just a different layouts

However, if creating a new layout items/obstacles, then it have to think about, what is really needed. Maybe a Curve Barrell, to make a smooth corner on autocross, would be nice to make an excellent layout, to get less often, nice "bug hit", what is sometimes very annoying. On the other hand, there is no sense, if just making only ramps and loops or halfpipes. Of course, it is fun to make them, and I think we would be not annoyed, if we would have a new ramp- item. So, there is many different kinds of items to possible create. Poll has a more choice options.

What is your opinion? You vote it! (I am just asking, you are telling!)
I wonder what makes you think that the devs would pay more attention to suggestions with polls in it. Now I'd understand if the devs themselves would make these kind of polls to determine which was to go. But that wouldn't be like Scavier used to work, and I doubt it will work like that now or in the future.
Quote from ColeusRattus :I wonder what makes you think that the devs would pay more attention to suggestions with polls in it. Now I'd understand if the devs themselves would make these kind of polls to determine which was to go. But that wouldn't be like Scavier used to work, and I doubt it will work like that now or in the future.

I know they will not pay attention. But if it is allowed to make an improvement suggestion, then I will make. I have made many suggestions to improve, I just make myself an YVIS, because... well, Just collecting your opinions, nothing else.

Of Course, I try to make a pay attention, but it is not "MUST". Or have I done something wrong?
Do you mean more different objects?
Or more than 512 objects at one layout?
Quote from Stefani24 :Do you mean more different objects?
Or more than 512 objects at one layout?

You can think it, about what it should be more? But I say, both, maybe different objects
Where is the "Close this Thread" Option?
This guy makes suggesting an art. Better than arox, though.
Id actaly love to soe some kind of bdrigdde to make ROC style layouts

And guys me he neas mor difrent kind of bojects liek adding curbs if im not misunderstood
yes. more objects. more circles too. i ran out of both trying to make a layout a couple months ago.

FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG