When a smartphone game, looks better than LFS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA3cKDUQZog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mauQr6G-wbQ

I'd say lfs models goes hand to hand with it but overall the graphics are a lot better in lfs.

LFS is better in overall graphics?

THIS IS A CELLPHONE GAME!!!!

If a CELLPHONE GAME looks equal or better than a 2011 (almost 2012) computer game, with all nowadays technology etc, something MUST be wrong!

Open your eyes, people, look to the horizon at least ONCE in your lives!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsvXsee-ZP0 this is a game from 2002, and it have night, working lights, reflection of the lights on the track, depth of field, visual backfire and sparks, etc...

(sorry for bad quality, it was recorded with an old camera, in a 21" 640x480 CRT screen, but imagine this game in 1920x1080!)

...why would it be awkward for a game on a mobile phone to look better than LFS? I don't personally think this game does, incidentally, but I really don't think it matters what it looks like.

that akward moment
when you type awkward wrong in the thread title
T_T

Quote from Fuse5 :

that akward moment
when you type awkward wrong in the thread title
T_T

Read my signature! :P


and... awkward is an awkward word

That moment when I dont give a shit

That awkward moment when you realise that LFS has a dev team of 3 part time staff, where as that game is a million dollar project with a team of full time developers. But then visual porn isn't what LFS is about.

...Smartass time: btw are we supposed to plug a wheel on a smartphone?
I'm all with 88amp, remember :"...it's a sim....not a screenshots generator..."

Quote from CTito :

If a CELLPHONE GAME looks equal or better than a 2011 (almost 2012) computer game, with all nowadays technology etc, something MUST be wrong!

No wonder if all you play is Call of Duty...

No shit it looks good, there are no physics to calculate...

Stupid thread IMO. anything looks good at that resolution. blow it up to a 50" screen and it will look much much worse than LFS.

Quote from Bose321 :

No wonder if all you play is Call of Duty..

It's weird actually, Battlefield 3 is much better not only generally, but also in screenshot generating terms.

Maybe if you meant his age by this.. then it could be right. :P

Quote from CTito :

If a CELLPHONE GAME looks equal or better than a 2011 (almost 2012) computer game, with all nowadays technology etc, something MUST be wrong!

Have you ever heard of something called Minecraft?

Hint: Not everyone needs fancy graphics to enjoy a game

Quote from CTito :

LFS is better in overall graphics?

THIS IS A CELLPHONE GAME!!!!

If a CELLPHONE GAME looks equal or better than a 2011 (almost 2012) computer game, with all nowadays technology etc, something MUST be wrong!

Open your eyes, people, look to the horizon at least ONCE in your lives!

what pixel exactly looks better then f1 2011, dirt 3, bf 3, forza 4, GT5 or even lfs.

I think this looks better than LFS! But then again what do I know.

Those aren't very good graphics. Equivalent to GTA:SA with slightly better textures (may appear this way due to the small screen size however), better looking sky, and nice reflections.

3LFS has a 3 (three? I only know one) member staff, but OK, I'm not going to enter in this merit, due this is not a based fact.

You all are enclosured to LFS universe, but I think that, if you play computer or console games, you play a lot of "bad physics" beautiful games besides LFS, because sincerely if you don't you have not only a really bad computer but also perception problems. We are almost going to 2012, 3D graphics can almost do miracles.

I perfectly know the noun joy and it's a joyful game, but it no longer reflects today's development since 2004 or 2005 (have in sight that it is the SAME game since there), and that is what I am explaining.

For those who don't have enough topic capacity and only knows how to insult and give LFS above-GOD title, please do not answer.

That's my opinion.

Quote from CTito :

3LFS has a 3 (three? I only know one) member staff, but OK, I'm not going to enter in this merit, due this is not a based fact.

You all are enclosured to LFS universe, but I think that, if you play computer or console games, you play a lot of "bad physics" beautiful games besides LFS, because sincerely if you don't you have not only a really bad computer but also perception problems. We are almost going to 2012, 3D graphics can almost do miracles.

I perfectly know the noun joy and it's a joyful game, but it no longer reflects today's development since 2004 or 2005 (have in sight that it is the SAME game since there), and that is what I am explaining.

For those who don't have enough topic capacity and only knows how to insult and give LFS above-GOD title, please do not answer.

That's my opinion.

You know, all those new games with shiny graphics get boring after you are done with them. I just downloaded an SNES emulator and started playing Super Mario Kart again after all those years.

And you know what? The graphics are crap, the sound is Lo-Fi, and yet it's tons of fun.

Heck, I would even prefer an unmodded Grand Prix Legends from 1998 to any Need for Speed crap just because is has something that is missing from all new Multi-Million Dollar Budget games - charme and passion behind it.

And that's exactly the direction LFS went and that's something good. If you don't like that, you're free to go.

Quote from ATHome :

You know, all those new games with shiny graphics get boring after you are done with them. I just downloaded an SNES emulator and started playing Super Mario Kart again after all those years.

And you know what? The graphics are crap, the sound is Lo-Fi, and yet it's tons of fun.

Heck, I would even prefer an unmodded Grand Prix Legends from 1998 to any Need for Speed crap just because is has something that is missing from all new Multi-Million Dollar Budget games - charme and passion behind it.

And that's exactly the direction LFS went and that's something good. If you don't like that, you're free to go.

Agreed!!!! Most of the games coming out might look good but...god they are booooorrriiiinnnggg. All those kids wan't these days is awuzum graphics!!! I'm not buying it, game has to have soul. And remember lfs is not 2011 game as one of you mentioned above.

Quote from ATHome :

You know, all those new games with shiny graphics get boring after you are done with them. I just downloaded an SNES emulator and started playing Super Mario Kart again after all those years.

And you know what? The graphics are crap, the sound is Lo-Fi, and yet it's tons of fun.

Heck, I would even prefer an unmodded Grand Prix Legends from 1998 to any Need for Speed crap just because is has something that is missing from all new Multi-Million Dollar Budget games - charme and passion behind it.

And that's exactly the direction LFS went and that's something good. If you don't like that, you're free to go.

Amen to this. Couldn't say better.

That is true though. Personally I've played LFS more than any other game, be it GTA IV and any other graphically advanced games.

the akwak monemt wehn potato.

Quote from Dennis93 :

the akwak monemt wehn potato.

...has better physics than lfs.