Just stating the obvious there, but still nicely written.
I like Alex, very talented and intelligent guy, and some good wit.
Definitely.
Also, while he mentions that Trucks or NNS are much more expensive than their single seaters "counterparts", he fails to mention that they have an healthy fanbase and strong ratings - NNS usually gets better ratings than IndyCar itself - making it "easier" to find sponsors.
It's not really a matter of "available seats". I'm pretty sure there are a lot of teams on stand-by, willing to line-up a few more entries. Put $2M on the table and you might find one right now.
The problem is that IndyLights is such a mess right now, no one wants to be involved in it anymore, let alone put silly money into it.
Poor value for money, even by single seaters standards + Badly outdated chassis(2002) + One team(SSM) dominating + Awful standards = Poor car count (then repeat - it's a vicious circle).
Suppress one of those factors, and you might have a few more "seats" appearing from nowhere.
For some reason I just don't see the FIA catching on in the United States period. IndyCar has a hard time catching on any more sadly, and look at AP's article on the US GP this year
Let's be honest, the interest for an FIA league leading into F1 would have to come from an interest in F1 it's self. That interest just isn't there. Sure, F1 can draw large crowds here for one or two events a year, because there's only 2 or 3 races a year in this area as opposed to 38 Sprint Cup races or 20 Indy Races all on at easy to view TV times and at a track near you at least the same number of times as F1 if not many more.
Without a sizable interest in F1 it's self I don't see how it would work to have a feeder series into a series that the mainstream just doesm't care about. Money and drive in the series would be tough. I also wouldn't see any big F1 team having any feeder teams set up here either.
Hamilton seems to be one of his close friend. Agreed for the sarcasm. But still good to hear someone writing what everyone involved or following motorsport know (but not the rest of the world)
It would work better then GP2 Asia, though not sure if it would be succesful. American countries are no motorsports development countries. And since it wouldn't just race in the US and Canada, but also in Argentina, Mexico and Brazil (maybe I shouldn't have said North American) they wouldn't be that dependand on the interest in the US.
If the season costs are as high as in Europe it would definately be an alternate option for a single seater career.
It's only really the single seater route that is the real killer. It's not as hard (obviously) to get into racing and ultimately end up somewhere like Le-Mans or Sebring.
I think the mistake people make is that F1 is the be all and end all of motorsport. Probably the only reason Lloyd is in the US is because for one reason or another Euro SS' wasn't working for him.
With so few GP tracks in America(3, or even 2 considering that Montreal might not be available for a feeder series due to usage restrictions) it would be hard to build something attractive for drivers.
To my understanding most of sport cars' paid drivers come from single seaters, no?
America has the tracks for a awesome gp2 and 3 series, but the fanbase clearly isn't there. Most people watching Indy just happen to be there for alms if there both in the same weekend. Bernie just has too much money. He even tried to pay the london city Officials 50 million to run a race past the palace.
not really, quite a few do, but there are drivers with a touring car background and some even with a rally background (and I remember hearing from a driver that switched from racing bikes to sportscars ). The series' being more about consistency than outright pace often needs a different type of driver.