Thanks for reply.
The steering becomes less accurate when I lower Parallel steer?
At this moment(I have +0.1 front toe), I found that 54% feels better than 27% perhaps because accuracy is not decreased like you say, but with 27% I did faster laps maybe because it has less understeer at entry. I'm not quite sure, but is it needed to change anti-roll bars in conjunction with Parallel steer to get a better handling, in order to get the accuracy of high parallel steer numbers while having the entry suffering?
That's why I asked what I should aim for when I tune parallel steer, because I don't know if I should look for the fastest setting while having a bad handling, or a good handling while sacrificing a small bit of speed. On the long term (endurance races), I think good handling is better, but in hotlapping it's not useful to have a slow set. I tried several settings but I always run into problems with each one. Around 10% car feels darty and way too oversteery in all corner phases. At 20%, the car is good in cornering but the entry is excessive. At 30%, it's like 20% but a little less darty and less oversteery at entry. At 40%, it's very close to 30% but less darty and less oversteery. At 50%, it's almost not darty but entry understeer is manifested heavily and a bit of mid corner understeering. I didn't try over 55%. The choice is vast but needs to be wise.