It is not relevant what kind of cheat he has used. Not relevant to any racer that is, however information and evidence will be forwarded to dev's (by the appropriate parties) which perhaps can prevent the use of such an exploit in the future.
Occasion: Editted Rule Where: 8. Starting Procedure What: Reasoning: The above should be a compromise between tire heating and a safe starting procedure. Outcome: Drivers who fail to follow the above guidelines can be protested and are subject to penalty. The type of penalty depends on the severity and impact of the offense.
Logic says that the third sector is being used to go from a single line formation to a dual line formation, and as so, speed is being lowered. Granted this should be announced by one of the admins on the server, however people should expect that at any time there will be a change to a dual line. In your last picture Jonsey has about 5 car lengths to the guy in front of him, and apparently still got involved in an accident. However given the discussion, we change the rule to the following change of rule:
Again, I see your point regarding the tire temperature. However it's not the first time incidents like the one on SC occur. Last year on WE1 similar incidents occurred, for instance. The 'shouldn't be hard at all', already proved to be hard enough.
Apparently it is needed to define more in detail what can be done, and what can't be done during a formation lap. As I recall it correctly, it was also you who ask for FrankMD's tool, which essentially entails the same functionality as the additional rule?
As said the SC will carry a higher speed till the moment single line will flow into a dual line, which should allow teams to build up more tire temperature. On a second note we are also looking into a suggestion made, to include a warming up lap before the formation lap, but we are still examining that.
Tire heating is strongly limited to small, predictable movements, within that half a car frame. We will also increase the speed of the safety car on the straights to increase the tire temperature under braking.
Additional processed penalties
#31 Mercury Racing Team GT2 received a +1L penalty for shift-s/p.
#33 prodrive' Racing received a +1L penalty for shift-s/p.
#39 Conquest Racing previous results removed due to approved change of car.
#41 Serbian Racers received a +30s (DT) penalty for re-taking positions after spinning on the pace lap.
#41 Serbian Racers received a +30s (DT) penalty for chat prior to the completion of the race.
#41 Serbian Racers will forfeit their fastest lap in the qualifying for Round 3, due to failing to provide an active team representative on IRC.
Remarks
The incidents on the backstretch during the formation lap have resulted in the following added rule. Teams are expected to drive their normal lines in order to prevent incidents similar to those which happened during the formation lap of South City.
Standings
The current standings can be found here and here.
Occasion: Added Rule Where: 8. Starting Procedure What: Reasoning: Sudden, unexpected, movements make it hard for teams to follow the single file formation procedure. Half a car length difference between the car in front and next to should allow a safer starting procedure. Outcome: Drivers who fail to follow the above guidelines can be protested and are subject to be penalized.The type of penalty depends on the severity and impact of the offense.
Include the following in your protest
• The correct lap,
• The cars (/teams) involved
• The lap/sector/time (see image above)
• And a short description from your point of view.
Include a replay with at least 10s before and 10s after the event for which you protest (link). To cut a replay use mprEdit – courtesy of MikeB. Additionally a movie of the incident may be useful as well, but protests have to include a replay.
Official Q1 results updated in OP. Please pay attention to:
a) What session you are connecting to, whether it is GT1 or GT2.
b) Make sure you connect with the right name format.
Also note that these penalties only apply to the Q1 session, and you can make up for it in Q2.
That means start per rules. The rules state the, for MoE, normal starting procedure. Ergo a rolling start behind the SC. In the event we change the starting procedure, we notify the drivers in this thread.
You can nominate more than the maximum amount of race weekend, but not drive with more than the maximum amount of drivers per race weekend. For the upcoming race it means that only 4 drivers per allowed team can drive for both the two qualifications, and the race.
If a team does use more than 4 drivers, we will remove all laps driven by that/those additional driver(s).
With the tracker still running privately, would it be possible to post an hourly screenshot of the tracker to get less rougher estimate who to fight with?
I appreciate your offer, but we have all that data available as well. Yes we have both outcomes, methods, worked out. We know precisely what the difference between the two is.
It is not a matter of workload, which you seem to claim, that our decision is to go with this method over the other. Our decision is based on the material for hand (LFS, supporting software) and the races which are still ahead of us. The outcome of using this method over the other option we find more weighty (see the summery of best interest for MoE in the OP) and since it will be applied in the future, it will applied for this case as well.
Please sent this to the appropriate email address (applications _at_ mastersofendurance.eu). Objections to the outcome placed in this thread will not be dealt with, as it is merely used for information and, till a certain extent, discussion purposes.