1. Litchfield Subaru Impreza STi Type-25 Spec C
2. Ferrari F430
3. Ferrari GTO (1984)
4. Ferrari F40
5. Ferrari F50
6. Ferrari Enzo
7. Porsche 911 GT3 RS, 997
8. BMW M5, E39
9. Yenko Camaro (1969)
10. Ariel Atom
Basically the Impreza would be my low key urban assault vehicle, the M5 would be my "comfy" car, the Camaro would satisfy my love for old muscle, and everything else would be put on a trailer and towed to the track.
Trying to deal with the problem is one thing, giving people detailed instructions on how to pirate LFS by linking them straight to the source is another.
That's fine. I chose to not take it seriously because I feel that no reasonable person will see sarin gas as a viable means of personal self defense.
If you're happy in your anti-gun world, stay in it. If you're not comfortable around guns, or wouldn't be comfortable in a society that allows almost anybody to have one, then stay where you are. I wouldn't be comfortable in a society where I have no right to personal protection, so I won't be moving any time soon.
Crime is crime. Who cares if a crime was committed with a gun, knife, steel pipe, toothpick, or with a bomb strapped to your chest?
Didn't somebody kill a bunch of people in recent years in Japan by setting off a chemical weapon in a crowded public area? How is that different than somebody shooting up a school? Either way a bunch of people die. I can come up with more examples of this, but you should get the point that this type of behavior is not limited to places where guns are legal.
Fear of getting shot may or may not keep the peace. People are always going to flip out and try to kill/rob/rape one another. But I can guarantee that if I, or any other person I know who supports our right to own a gun was in that building and was armed, not nearly as many people would have been hurt or killed.
Heel-toe is useful for bringing the engine revs up to match the new gear when you downshift. It's called heel-toe because typically you use it while braking, which means your other foot is operating the clutch so your right foot needs to work both the brake and the throttle at the same time.
In my personally car typically I use the ball of my foot to work the brakes, then I swing my heel around to blip the throttle.
Basically it smoothes out your downshifts. If you downshift and pull out the clutch very quickly it upsets the car, and may even reverse lock the driven wheels. If you heel-toe correctly you can let out the clutch quick and it will be perfectly smooth.
I don't understand how your question/statement pertains to my statement. Of course this amendment can be changed or stricken from the Constitution, and if you want to legally remove the second amendment, you're more than welcome to try.
Please recognize this as your opinion, unless you've got some really good numbers to bring to this conversation that might show otherwise. You may believe that it doesn't, some believe that it does. Without quality statistics both statements are pretty much baseless.
If you don't understand why Americans are willing to assert their right to have specific rights then you don't understand American society. I don't mean that as an insult any more or less than it'd be insulting for you to tell me that I don't know what it's like to live in Finland.
I'm generally not a fan of roundy round type racing, at least to watch... but that would be a really cool addition that could potentially be loads of fun to play.
lol... quick car, yes. Great car for the money. But we'll have to disagree about it being faster. In stock trim, of course. I won't push this point because it's a little OT in relationship to this thread.
We believe it to be a right because our constitution tells us that it *is* a right.
The United States constitution is quite clear. While it mentions a militia, it also states very directly that the right of the people to keep and bear arms is not to be infringed.
It's a shame none of the other students or professors were armed. The casualties would have been minimized. If the shooter knew that other people would have weapons he may not have even tried in the first place.
I hadn't actually considered that. But in the end I chose the more cost effective solution. I was going to buy coilovers anyway, and I sold my old wheels to recover some of the price of the new wheels. Down the road I'm going to save money because I won't be replacing the bearings as often, and when I do it'll only take 20 minutes per side instead of several hours with a press. Fortunately the 2005+ parts are designed in a way that makes quick changes possible and easy.
But in this case physical representation can easily be applied to the setting. I view a race track as more than mere content. In my mind an accurately modeled race track is as important as accurate car control physics. I find no real value in LFS when it comes to realistic car control, although that aspect does help considerably when it comes to what I'd like to use it for. What I'd like to use it for is to familiarize myself with real race tracks. I get my car control practice in the form of frequent autocross competitions or the occasional track event.
So in my mind a simulator is something that I use to progress my skills for the real deal. In that aspect, the value of LFS as a simulator for my needs is quite low. But one aspect of the game that I find extremely valuable is what you can learn from it about driving around a race track in heavy traffic.
There are no FWD cars that cost half as much (USDM, I know Canadian STis cost more) as my STi that can outrun me in the 1/4 mile or around the track. Unless you're talking about highly modified used cars. In which case I don't feel bad, because if I really cared I could either make my STi faster or sell it and build something for half the cost of the FWD car and go faster in the process.
But I bought my car because I enjoy it... I'm not trying to set any land speed records. I'm building experience so I can go road racing in a few years.
I guess as a software developer myself I consider it a bit odd to sell a product in it's 'alpha' phase. But I've been around long enough to know that the software development lifecycle is flexible guide... not set in stone.
I do admire the work the developers have put into this knowing that if they can structure their release schedule and introduction of new features in the way they have their code must be written quite nicely.
2004 STi, now equipped with 2005 STi hardware. I can assure you the problem was with the wheel bearings. The heat created by 12.7" rotors with Brembo calipers running high temp pads on a 3300 lb. car would quickly cook the car's weak wheel bearings, causing them to flex, causing pad knockback. The problem was that the wheel bearings were designed for a low powered, light weight early '90's car and weren't suitable for a 3300 lb. 300+ hp car with big brakes.
The problem was so bad that after only four hours of track time I would get pad knockback driving around in a parking lot at low speed.
Several thousand dollars was required for OEM 2005 STi wheel bearings/hubs, knuckes, compatible front suspension, wheels (different bolt pattern), and ABS gear adapters. I spent a little extra and got a quality suspension setup.
Pad knockback is gone. It's a pretty well documented issue among 2004 STi owners. At least on the boards I visit.
Well, in that sense not many programs ever actually reach the 'final' phase of the software lifecycle. Even software that is in it's gold stage tends to get a patch every now and then to fix unseen bugs.
I'm not entirely sure why this software was dubbed as "alpha." Because in the strictest sense of the word as it applies to the software lifecycle it would at least be open beta from what I can tell.
1. 1982 Cadillac Cimmaron - wasn't running when sold
2. 1982 Pontiac Grand Prix - wasn't running when sold
3. 1987 Pontiac Grand Am - spun bearing, junker
4. 1991 Geo Metro - barely running when sold
5. 1990 Mazda RX-7 - blown engine @ 180k miles
6. 1989 Mazda RX-7 convertible - running, decent condition, electrical issues when sold
7. 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX - wrecked at race track
8. 2002 Nissan Sentra Spec-V - sold in good condition, still running strong!
9. 1999 Hyundai Tiburon - still own, still running strong
10. 2004 Subaru Impreza WRX STi - currently own, perfect condition, fast car
Motorcycles...
1. 1990 Suzuki GS500 - great bike, ran great when sold, not wrecked
2. 1991 Yamaha FJ1200 - wrecked, f***ing left turning cars
3. 1999 Honda CBR600F4 - ran great when sold, dropped once by me
4. 2002 Honda RC51 - ran great when sold, amazing machine, dropped by and repaired by friend
5. 2002 Honda CBR1100XX Blackbird - wonderful bike, ran great when sold, never dropped
This might sound harsh, but IMO this game will always be more of a game and less of a simulator until I can actually practice driving on tracks that I may one day set rubber to. They'll never be able to perfectly simulate what it's like to drive a real car through a cheap wheel/pedal set on a home PC, but it's not so difficult to model a real race track and give me some time to get a feel for it before I actually go and drive it. Just my opinion.
God please leave pad knockback out of this game... I spent thousands of dollars to make my personal car more resistant to it by upgrading to stronger, more durable wheel bearings off a newer model year car. The last thing I want is to log on to a video game and have to deal with it.
Found the problem... in order to launch from LFSWorld you must first open LFS to tell it what level license it should expect a request for. I was attempting to join demo servers and S2 servers, but LFS was expecting an S1 request.
I checked my game code, which is .5W, and to be sure I attempted to join a game server listing the same game code and the error is still present. Searching for more info...