Need some help Jammer.

Without AO samples the car does not generate a shadow on the surface, and I haven't touched anything.

Quote from G!NhO :

"we"???

If you mean the S2 licensed people then yes "we" have a nice RBR.

Don' put that in my face :P

You know what wygiuxx? Just add arch extensions, a rear splitter, a huge GT wing and we have an RB4 GTR right there

That's really really nice.

Quote from Bean0 :

Yay

Here's the next one...

I'm scared to take a crack at this for fear of anything lame coming out

EDIT: Ok I have another lame one..

"That is one hot lady right there, you see her curves? It goes like this... Mmmm, yeah."

ANOTHER EDIT: Why is everyone onto weird pictures of Red Bull now?

Last edited by only.one.RydeR, Fri 27 Mar 2009, 19:14.

Lol, haha sorry, I'm a lame dude

Tire checkers marking 'wet tires'. He's really wetting them, alright.

Lame, I know.

If you don't get it, the guy in front looks like he's peeing on the tires.

I don't either, we're on the same side now Jamie :P

Quote from piggy501 :

Something to do with noise restrictions or CO2 emissons I think.

Hm. Never knew my fave car was harmful to the environment.

Thanks! Will download them and upload soon. Thanks a lot man.

Quote from Töki (HUN) :

I have the same issues when using motion blur. The cuts around the car are not really nice. Haven't find the solution yet.

This is somewhat easy.

1. Make 3 new layers.

2. Now using the lasso tool, select the car, including the wheels. Don't go into the car. Even leaving a tiny space between the boundaries and the car would do.

3. Cut and paste the car into the topmost layer you created.

4. Now ctrl+click the car layer (this selects the car's outline)while you are in the 'background layer' (the original pic), then hit ctrl+shift+I (Select inverse)

5. Copy the selected onto the 2nd and 3rd layers you created.

6. For the 2nd layer from the top, apply the motion blur.

7. For the 3rd layer from the top, apply some gaussian blur, nevermind what value, just not too much, and there should be a noticable change at least.

It's not perfect, but it will do. Hope you understand.

This is hard, that window style made me think Mustang, but then you said it had 46 HP -_-

I'm playing a little FPS game called Special Force here, and called Soldier Front in other countries. Actually I play it more than LFS, because, well, you WOULD get tired of BL1 for a year, right?

I've got a simple question for you Max users..

As everyone knows, .max is a closed file format, so you can't import it into anything. However, is it possible to open it in Max and then save as a .3ds? Because I really need some files in .max, but I'm using Blender, so yeah

Hope it makes sense.

I thought the spokes were not that thick? Especially near the middle.

EDIT: OK saw the pic in full, that's great. And I also like your color scheme

Quote from GrIp DrIvEr :

the nissan skyline is actually only illegal in California.

I know I'm quoting an old post, but why?

Yes I did check it in textured mode. It was facing the right way.

I set a small amount of AO samples; however it causes too much noise. Will try not to do that next time, lol.

Another render. This time I've tweaked the settings and the reflections. Personally I like Gustix's rendering style, so I got the inspiration of this from him.

Oh and BTW I know that there's something wrong with the brake disks. I have no idea how it happened (It was right when I checked the texture and UV image).

I'd like to render that sweet XRR interior, yeah.

If possible, can anyone convert the new patch Z models into a .blend format? The .3ds files found in the Scenes/Materials section is quite broken when imported in Blender. PLEASE. Thank you.

Quote from mutt107 :

i go to church, does that count?

Nope, that doesn't count, if you don't believe..

Quote from SamH :

Nahh.. it's fun! Discussing religion and politics is always a dangerous pastime on internet forums, and mostly it's a really bad idea. As long as it doesn't descend into abuse, and everybody is respected for their beliefs (even if not shared), what's the harm?

SamH definitely wouldn't bring the lock in this!

As long as there's no flame war, like he said

Quote from NightShift :

On the contrary I think I understand too well, I have to live with the funny beliefs the catholics want to impose onto others basically every day, enjoying the privilege to live in the state that financially feeds the Vatican and its luxurious style of living using the hard-earned money of tax payers.

Want an example of that? Pope and his cronies have raised a fuss over the case of Luana Englaro, a girl that has been cerebrally dead as a result of an accident that happened over SEVENTEEN years ago.

Despite the girl having expressed the will to have the plug pulled should such a situation arise, pressures from Vatican were exerted in basically every possible way, starting with the hospital where the girl was kept in (which was managed by catholic nuns), and then through legal actions towards the family, without ignoring the pro-life lunatics making their life difficult in several ways.

The religious authorities had an easy game with the politicians, as the government through the action of the Prime Minister and the Welfare Minister tried every trick in their hats to stop the plug being pulled.

You understand, with the forthcoming elections for the European Parliament, politicians are especially quick to comply with whatever request come from those guys (as Giulio Andreotti once said: God doesn't vote, but priests do)

It's so hard to say if the robed ones held any interest in the life or death of the already dead girl. They say so but what we see is they fought to impose their beliefs onto someone else.

Doesn't matter if the girl wanted to have it another way. They have The Truth, The Money and The Hospitals. And the politicians too. So they have both the heavenly blessing and the means to make the rules.



Agree with you, my point being that when the most important figure of your faith makes such a sorry statement there's little to be proud about.



I can't talk for others but I'm surely taking this conversation in a relaxed way. We're just talking, and I know my words won't change my mind of any fervent catholic, and I know no catholic can change my mind with just words.

There are good people inside the catholic church, but I fear most of the power is outside the grasp of those hands. Things won't change for the better any time soon.

Meh, actually, I can't be bothered with my Pope or any of a part of the Church doing some things... Not good, shall we say.

Religion isn't really about the governing body of the church, but what YOUR faith is in.

Quote from Becky Rose :

Because you said you did not understand your holy book regarding the subject of contraception.



So I explained it. The spilling of a mans semen is murder under Catholism, because it is deemed to contain the seed of life.

That's what it says.

I had the gist of it, but you clearly explained more. Lol.

How do you know all this stuff?

Whoops, thanks for pointing out. Not familiar with Volkswagens..

Quote from Becky Rose :

If you'll allow a heathen to explain your bible for you, it is because the bible masogonistically believes that the seed of life is in mans semen, and has nothing at all to do with women. It was the believe of it's authors (clearly not God who you'd expect to have some knowledge of Human plumbing) that the seed of life was contained within the semen and transfered into the woman to nurture it for life to form.

Consequently the bible authors also believed that wasting life by spilling semen was murdering. This is why catholics are not allowed to masturbate, and why condoms are considered heresy.

The fact that that semen ent gonna pop out into a young paritioner anytime soon without an egg was sadly lost on the bards of the arabic trade caravans who spread the stories by means of Chinese wisper before some idiot wrote them down and called it's Gods work seems to have been overlooked.

I'm very intrigued as to why you are telling me that.