As is kind of alluded to above re: slipper clutches, this is pretty much exactly what happens in racing motorcycles. Engine braking is limited to just about nothing, in the interest of consistency and smoothness.
As is made obvious with the new BF1 in LFS, the ECU is used in racing cars for a similar effect, although more easily adjustable.
Like motorcycle slipper clutches? In the cars you are talking about, is this done through electohydraulic clutch control, or a mechanical system like the motorcycles? For anyone not familiar with the idea, here is a good link : http://www.sigmaperformance.com/slipperclutch.html
Yeah I have that understanding too. I think they do add more engine braking to the throttle-closed ECU settings when they have good reason.
The other thing I just noticed too was that it used to take a good bit of dithering of the mouse button to get a good launch without spinning the F08...I could do it but apparently a lot of n00bs couldn't as everytime there was an open F08 race someone would spin on the grid.
Now, it seems as if its markedly easier to keep the thing pointy end forward when launching it.
Very interesting stuff. The craziest thing is that now when I switch from XFG to BF1 I actually get slightly queasy from the speed change.
I haven't had much time to drive the new patch, but the hour or so I've spent has been very interesting.
I drove the BF1 around numerous tracks and marveled at how I ever lived driving here at school with the mouse without traction control. Simply amazing. The sound engine for the BF1 is really nice too.
Then I went and drove an the XFG around BLGP for a few laps, and while I never really got up to pace, it seemed as if the tire modeling was a little less peculiar when making tight turns or getting the car momentarily sideways. It still seems to me that the cars don't hook up hard enough when they stop moving sideways, but that may be a seat of the pants thing more than an actual simulation thing.
So then for giggles I went and pulled out an old, slow, easy to drive F08 setup for BL1. And promptly blasted away my old personal best by 1.5 seconds in about ten laps of practice. Whoa! I didn't get better at driving (I'm sure I'm not as good now as I was when I was spending more time with LFS) so what changed that made the F08 so much quicker? Or is it just me? I may be horribly confused. Maybe its just easier to drive now?
Yeah I never really loved the sound of the V10s on TV, but when I got a chance to hear them in person it was phenomenal. I would have loved to hear the old V-12s. The thing that really blew me away though was how aggressive the spark-cut TC is out of tight bends, it sounds like a thousand little bombs going off.
Well said. I took some liberty with your words. One of my huge pet peeves are people papering over the past with rose colored lenses. This seems to happen in all aspects of life. I love when flipping morons tell me about how safe cars were in the 1950's. Or old folks lament teen pregnancy "today" when teen pregnancy fifty years ago occurred at double today's rate.
Oh: Senna made a mistake and paid the ultimate price. Or something broke, although the evidence I've personally seen doesn't support that. Not even a kangaroo court and millions of dollars worth of handwaving could determine otherwise, as tristan and others have noted.
In fact, this kind of stupid bickering over something that is over and done with a decade ago wouldn't be going on if it wasn't for irresponsible government officials and their media-friendly kangaroo court antics. There never should have been all of that public money spent on such a fruitless, pointless exercise. Sillyness in the extreme. The same damn thing always happens when famous people die, because politicians see opportunity.
I was a wee little kid watching that race that morning (live in the US, on ESPN back then IIRC), and it was pretty somber for me.
That and the lowercase tag names (which was technically wrong but I've been doing forever anyways) are the two big changes to make HTML an XML compliant language, correct?
Does the real life Sauber use third spring? I recall that not all of the F1 teams were?
I agree with tristan about dual springs, the only intelligent use of such is with a very largely different spring rate tender spring for certain practical applications. And yes, as I recall it is Smith's contention that the use of progressive spring setups or rising rate geometry is something to be approached with caution and consideration at the least, and better if you don't need to do it at all.
Third spring setups are definitely cool though, and would be nice to have for the single seaters in LFS.
I dunno. Not just Smith, but very good drivers I trust have suggested making downshifts as late as practicable, unless one has a very good reason to need the extra engine braking. I think the true benefits for experienced drivers were best described by Vain and Tristan.
One of the things I see as an obvious problem is feel. A good braking/steering system gives a lot of feel for what is going on at the front corners of the car. In my experience, the feel as to the braking at the rear is more vague because it isn't as dominant and isn't hooked up to the steeering. With engine braking, you need to be a left foot braker in order to modulate both brakes and engine braking at the same time. I think the benefits of engine braking show up in situations like tristan describes, because you cannot adjust brake bias for every corner perfectly, but can do a much better job if you can modulate engine braking to modulate the effective brake bias.
This is not something that is easily done. Its stupid/pointless/impossible on the streetable cars I race that have synchromesh gearboxes. For them, the benefit of engine braking is saving the inevitably undersized brakes from abuse.
In LFS, it seems to me that since the feel of braking is lacking compared to the real thing, you have to rely on either lots of practice or secondary clues to know when you overdo the engine braking and cause understeer/oversteer depending on drive configuration. Since there is always plenty of brakeforce in LFS, aggressive use of engine braking seems to me to uneccessarily complicate things at the expense of consistency.
However, for people looking to run WR times, the ability to dynamically adjust brake bias without twisting a knob/punching F12 has obvious benefits. I wonder how large they are. I imagine the benefits are greater on the cars with downforce because their apparent mass distribution changes with airspeed. Reason number 13516 it would be nicer for everyone if racecars had the wings loading the uprights instead of the chassis.
It makes absolutely no difference whether or not you use engine braking in a game that doesn't involve weak brakes or brakes that overheat and fade. Since brake force in LFS is always sufficient to lock the wheels if you so desire, there is no excuse for the above rather wrong comment.
As Carroll Smith correctly noted, using engine braking as a matter of course makes things less repeatable and less consistent.
Perhaps in cars with downforce where optimum brake balance changes with airspeed...other than that, why could using both be "quicker"?
Good point there as well. I just filled up for 2.50 a gallon, which is outrageously expensive by US standards. My insurance is about 1000 dollars a year.
I'm actually flying to the USGP this year, it would be about a 1200 mile roundtrip drive for me and the airline ticket is about 200 dollars roundtrip. I'll drive to the Canadian GP as that is only about 150 miles away.
Yet there are folks who get it. Folks from all over. They may be rarer in some places, but they certainly exist. I understand what you are saying and the truth and value in it, but I'm a stubborn curmudgeon.
I said they went to Brandeis and then took up theater in NY. I would assume you know where and what Brandeis is, its a relatively well known institution. So yeah, I didn't imply they were from NY, I explicitly stated they went there after getting an education. Thats how NYC maintains its population really, what with all those "born there" folks moving all over God's country as you correctly generalized.
Nope, nothing at all funny about that. That statement is largely true, unfortunately. Something like 85 percent of the crime guns used in NYC were originally sold by FFL dealers in the southeast. The ATF website has a cute little map with arrows pointing from Georgia to NY to descibe the trade, which is where the Georgia comment comes from.
Whenever I meet Texans I can usually find common ground pretty fast, I had a Texan roommate and we got along quite well. It was rather hilarious when he was playing poker online and some Canadian called him out for saying "y'all", and he then asked me what the heck "eh?" meant....
Us enlightened (hehe) folk might as well be from Peoria, if you go by our accent.
Uh, no. Have you ever spent time in Texas? I wouldn't call it the land of civility or politeness.
Folks here who are my close friends still don't get the sarcasm. It seems dead baby jokes just don't play well here. I don't get why everyone takes life so seriously...can't I make a joke about backalley abortions without people taking up arms?
I personally think its hilarious to see the jokes the Euros make about Americans, particularly when you turn them around. Did you see the recent Daily Show segment on the Danish?
No, not NY per se. Moreso the Northeastern United States in general.
BTW, I don't actually believe that. Its just funny to get a rise out of people living in flyover states...
The show, IMHO, sucked. What couldn't have happened without writers that have experience in NY is much of the sarcastic humor.
Nope, like I said they both went to NY after their higher educations, perhaps in search of people with a sense of humor and a high value placed on art. The latter half of that sentence is facetious, btw.
And indeed that one you made was spot on. Nothing wrong with that. Heck, I've made that one myself before.
You see, I can make as many desparaging jokes as I want about NY, Georgia, the Danish, etc. and not get my panties in a bunch if the tables are turned on me. That capability is something the British surely seem to have in spades, but it seems many Americans do not.
The only folks with (handguns) on the streets of NY are criminals that bought them from some guy that "legally" purchased them in Georgia, filed the numbers off, and resold them on the streets of NY.
I say sarcastic things all the time that would be just plain understood in the northeast and these folks here in the southwest stare at me like I'm crazy or I killed their dog, depending on the particular remark.
Who cares? Where are the writers from?
Dana Klein: NY
Marta Kauffmann: Went to Brandeis, then took up theatre in NY
David Crane: Ditto.
Humor like friends just doesn't come from Georgia. I'm making a generalization, but sometimes that isn't so crazy or bad.
Yeah, and like I said I'm not a NASCAR fan. The most interesting "left turn only" tracks are usually not the ones NASCAR is competing on. If you ask drivers or fans, they will tell you that the now ubiquitous 1.5 mile speedways get tired after the first few...
If you look down the ranks from NASCAR to more accessible forms of circle track racing in the US, you find some of the really interesting tracks (some have very little bank, some have huge banks with insane transitions, some are ridiculously small and more like a bullfight than a race, etc.)
The one thing I really do like about circle track racing is that it makes quality racecar components that are sized about right to be adaptable to road cars quite readily accessible and inexpensive.