For me I want so see LFS give up on people with historic computers, I dont mean to be snobish but if you cant run DX9 well, its time to move on.
iRacing and nkPro have DX9 and use it in their game and it shows in the graphics department, for me that is an added enjoyment I get from those games vs LFS. not sure but I think its called Dynamic Lighting and DX9 is needed?
[OT] DX11 is coming and sooner or later people will leave for more polished game with cooler graphics and I would hate to see that as I do love LFS. Becase multiplayer is keeping LFS ahead of the rest for now.
The track surface textures is something needed, LFS seems to be a Perfect world, no bumps not much road camber, no signes of track work ever being done. South City has the best road on the face of the planet! Some aphault Concrete, other mixes and texture differances would be greatly appreciated.
I totally agree that FFB in iRacing & nkPro > LFS, but that doesn't mean LFS is bad, Porsches are nice Ferrari's are better.
And more polygons in every area.
iRacing and nkPro have DX9 and use it in their game and it shows in the graphics department, for me that is an added enjoyment I get from those games vs LFS. not sure but I think its called Dynamic Lighting and DX9 is needed?
[OT] DX11 is coming and sooner or later people will leave for more polished game with cooler graphics and I would hate to see that as I do love LFS. Becase multiplayer is keeping LFS ahead of the rest for now.
The track surface textures is something needed, LFS seems to be a Perfect world, no bumps not much road camber, no signes of track work ever being done. South City has the best road on the face of the planet! Some aphault Concrete, other mixes and texture differances would be greatly appreciated.
I totally agree that FFB in iRacing & nkPro > LFS, but that doesn't mean LFS is bad, Porsches are nice Ferrari's are better.
And more polygons in every area.