If you like that check out the other movies written by Charlie Kaufman like Being John Malkovich and Adaptation.
As for the director, Gondry, his other films are a bit weird, for that reason you might not like em but they're worth checking out. E.g. The Science of Sleep.
Human Nature is a bit formulaic IMO, good for completists.
Not sure how you could call Human Nature formulaic.
And speaking of Charlie Kaufman, his new one Synecdoche, New York is pretty amazing. First one he's written AND directed. Another standout performance by Philip Seymour Hoffman.
As far as I remember it, it's entirely on the noble savage idea, and it plays out as a more or less standard comedy. The visuals are interesting, the cast is certainly worthy, but as a whole it left me quite underwhelmed.
Another Gondry's movie that did not impress me one bit is Be Kind Rewind. I can discern the skills, the irony, the underlying message, but in the end it's more a divertissement than a movie.
Despite it not being my favorite, I regard Science of Sleep as far more interesting
Thanks, I'll digg into it. I like movies with a deeper meaning, somewhat justifies using time in front of a computer if there is a special message the author wants to share.
Donnie Darko however, never understands it completely, a lot of speculations ofc but I have never yet understood completely the whole history.
Kaufman plays a lot with the concept of reality, its perception of it, how it shapes his characters' identity and memory. He's a bit Dickian in a way His scripts can get a bit clunky sometimes and likely appeal brainy people more than 'emotional' types.
Along the same lines be sure to check out Stranger than Fiction, different people but the general mood is not that far.
If you're interested watch the Director's Cut, it explains pretty much everything. All in all I'm the type of person who likes to be kept guessing rather than having a rather bland explanation delivered on a silver plate, so I could without the DC.
That's because the explanation behind DD is not that interesting. To make a comparison with a completely different film, i.e. 2001 A Space Odissey, that's one where I very much liked to read a down-to-earth (excuse the pun) explanation (which is found in AC Clarke's book) as I felt the film is a bit too cryptic for my taste. Kubrick surely did that on purpose, and it fits the underlying theme very well and cleverly too, but requires a great deal of effort on the spectator's part.
Former Special Air Service (SAS) soldier, Mick Gould, trained Liam Neeson in combatives and weapons handling skills
Really enjoyed this film, I didnt realise it was out so long and heard nothing about it but I tell you one thing for sure this guy ownes James Bond and the car chase scenes are right up there with Ronin in my book.
Hey Tomba(FIN), Laugh at me all you like; because I know that movie is the best one in ages, just like James Bond but EVEN BETTER!
Unrealistic as in plot and storyline ya I agree especially in the final scene when he returns her to L.A. as if nothing happened and all was merry. A bit dodgy~
But,
the action and driving and super spy stuff was exciting to watch, eyecandy.
Ooooo, great film IMO, besides having Tom Cruise in it.
You'll either get the film right off the bat, or you'll get to the end and think, WTF was that all about, my missus has seen it 3 times now, and still doesnt get it.
Cameron Diaz has a great line of dialouge in the film, I'll leave you to find out which one it is!!!