There is a difference compared to how it worked back then though. S1 users can now play on what would earlier be considered S2 servers if it only uses content they have access to. Same thing when S3 is released. S2 users will only need an S3 licence if they want to play with either Rockingham or the new car. You won't get the situation we did when S2 was released where one lonely guy was lapping South City by himself, wondering where everyone went.
And I guess, that is the reason for being able to release S3 content, even if S2 it´s not final yet. Anyone who decides not to upgrade to S3 after this initial release, will still be able to have access to almost all the content available in LFS, for the exception of one car and one track.
It IS ready for sale, thousands of people are now with a functional product with very few bugs, how can it be seen as "not ready for sale'?
A true alpha product will not be released to the market for sale, and obviously LFS at this stage isn't the case.
There's nothing as truely complete in LFS, it is a project without an definite end, it's a fundamental concept that I think is not hard to grasp.
Devs keep thinking about new things to do, there will always be things to complete. If the devs just call it a day now and say "hey this is it, we are done, you won't get anymore update." Then will you be any happier?
No, we will keep moaning why other games have 6000 cars and dynamic boob modelling on pit babes, while we have to settle for a product that is never complete.
Sinbad you should feel lucky they don't charge a whole lot more. I know if I developed a sim it wouldn't be anywhere near as cheap as LFS. It's a freakin' bargain.
Will this Rockingham track coming earlier than S3 so it is in S2 first? Or is it going straight to S3? Or I think we need to wait more information as well
EDIT: ok special version of Live For Speed! got it, (perhaps)
Sinbad or any other LFS user, shouldn´t feel lucky about anything. LFS is a comercial product that has a price set by their creators, not their costumers...
So as long as I payed what´s been asked for this product, I have no obligation of feeling lucky or honoured to be able to be part of the LFS community. And as long as anyone follows the rules set in this forum, I don´t see why you can´t express a opinion that doesn´t "praise" the devs, without looking ungrateful or a "moaner".
I think you're all missing the bigger picture here.
Look at the spread of cars and tracks across S1 and S2. What the hell makes you think that ALL you'll get in S3 for the same money is a single track? That's just stupid. It'll either be a lot less money (or none), or this is just the start of a run of new stuff before the full S3 release.
Personally I'd be happy to pay another £12 for whatever new stuff they give us as long as one of those is the graphics engine update, because that would then give us the lighting support to have dynamic time of day races. That in itself would make it seem like we had more new content.
Without the graphic update I want 400 new cars and I think 17 tracks. And an elephant. Who doesn't want to race elephants? And the rally pack! And some Chelsea Whoppers. Mmmmm, Chelsea Whoppers...
There's a difference between showing frustration, and then someone on this thread calling the developers behavour 'twatty'.
I would like LFS to be perfect. I would liek updates everyday but christ almighty I wouldn't call the developers twats. By calling THEM twatty I would be callng myself a TWAT for not going out and actually trying to do what THEY do myself.
You are freakin' lucky! Your lucky that all the sim developers don't sit back and think... we are under charging massively here because I am sure they could charge a whole lot more (just look at iRacing). You lot are treated like freakin' spoilt kids!