Ok a bit more delving into the “
Daily Heil” it sound and looks bad...but as always...if you look a bit more cloesly there are a few point which need to be raised.
1) The Council (Local Authority) has a duty to house people; they can't see them out on the street. Since there is unlikely any Council house which can fit 10 people, the council are at the mercy of private landlords who can charge what they like. Unless the option is too let innocent children suffer.
2) How can she be reasonably expected to work and look after 8 kids? She shouldn't have had that many really, but it isn't a crime....despite what some people want
3) If it's 'Council' accommodation, children of opposite genders from a certain age onwards (I think from the age of 9...not sure) can't share a bedroom, and nor can a child and a teenager of the same gender. If it's privately rented accommodation, these rules don't apply.
4) The
REAL crime here is the lack of social, affordable housing available. It's not just large family size (and lets get real...it don't matter about colour, race or creed...there's no need for that size of family) but there are other average sized families of 3 kids and 2 parents who are being put up at the expense of the taxpayer due to the lack of affordable housing.
BTW, I'd like to point out that as far as I'm aware... the maximum Housing Allowance is £1,600 per week. How the “Daily Heil” got £90,000 out of a 52 year is beyond me....unless London village works on a new 56 week and ain't told the rest of us