Well, that's the dilema. If we are talking something that is so much an integral part of the package as a diffuser then yes or only do some basic mechanical/electronic tests.
Redbull is probably staying home for a very good reason.
But with every car has a different aero package. So that 'awesome part' would take months for another team to replicate. F1 cars are highly complex aero machines. The concept, to design, to testing take more than two weeks.
You can either test it as soon as possible and develop it so it's ready for the first race, or you can test your car without it and then find the 'magic' part doesn't work in the final few tests. Suddenly you're car concept is broken are you're buggered all because you hid a part you weren't sure about.
For sure teams will be testing different parts and what not, but I doubt very much any team is hiding special parts.
But it looks as though the engine exhaust is used to create a low pressure area to assist 'sucking' the radiator 'exhaust' out as well... But I still wonder about turbulence in that area, as the air over and around the sidepod won't want to suddenly change direction...
Having said that, it was a pretty quick car relative to everyone else today (but we don't know about fuel loads or anything, so it could be totally meaningless if the Sauber had 20kg fuel and the Ferrari 120kg...)
lol, jokes on me then . I don't think there will be much of an issue with it changing direction, it's probably already "prepared" under the engine cover from air that flows through the sidepods/radiators.
The air on the outside of the bodywork isn't prepared though... if you were a particle of air moving along the bodywork at 180mph, would you want to suddenly change direction and fill that void without going turbulent?
The diffuser's at the back of the car. In order to work the diffuser properly you need to decide what you're going to do with the airflow when it hits the front wing. So testing a front wing designed to work with a different diffuser wouldn't make any sense.
Remember last year how long it took the teams to catch up to the double-floor concept? In part it was due to gearbox arrangements and issues at the rear of the car, but apparently the big issue was re-thinking the rest of the whole aero design in order to make a new diffuser work properly.
At this time of year it's way too busy to be copying other teams. Many of the teams will already be working 24 hours a day trying to get their own cars ready, they simply don't have the time to be trying to figure out the designs of the other teams and then adapting them. Like I said before, the launch car is a bodged together vehicle; quick fixes will have been made to get around issues caused by parts that weren't made in time or parts that are only just working. The car at the first race won't be much better, and it's only a couple of races in when the car is properly sorted. Then teams will be starting to implement things they've seen on other cars.
However, they will have a department watching the other teams already to try to figure out as much as they can of what their competitors have done over the winter. They won't really make any decisions based on their research until after the first race when the true pace of the cars is first shown. The time between now and a few races in when the parts are first raced is used to properly evaluate the idea, adapt it to their own car, simulate it and its effects on the whole car (wind tunnel, cfd, etc), build it and then test it on a Friday at a race event.
I wouldn't be suprised if the Sauber isn't simply hastily cobbled together using a lot of the previous years design internally, still to early to simply write it off.
Makes me think of Force India's sidepods last year, they had a very sharp 'dip' in them which made me wonder whether that would mess up the air flow off the back off the sidepods, but they didn't seem to have any trouble. Then again, CFD and wind tunnels and knowledge allows them to see things the rest of us can't see.
What I do like is how the cars seem to be becoming a bit more 'diverse' in their designs, like the changing rules hs lead to teams going about solving the same problem in more varied ways than in the last few seasons, which is a good thing IMO. Of course if the rules stabilise for long enough the best design tricks will win out and all the cars will look identical again. (And already, several teams have copied Red Bull's crooked snout, after all).
They won't know what their best diffusers, etc., are without testing them on the track. The earlier they test those components, evaluate their solutions, and sort out any problems, the better they will be in the season.
@Tristan: Thats what i mean, the air will probably already have been angled on the underside of the car to blend with the air on the top. Aerodynamics isn't just limited to the outside of the car. The only problem would be dealing with convection.
I like the new looks of the cars... gives a bit more F1 feeling again to me opposed to the weird designes we had last years. Too bad the front wing is so damn ugly huge!
I assume you mean he improved his 'light' time with a 'heavy' one. Obviously he wasn't pushing on his 'light' lap but even if he is just improving on his heavy lap, it's not really a big deal is it? That's what happens when you are lapping a track, you are inevitably going to improve your lap time.
The Sauber has been quietly impressive so far. Quicker than I had expected, considering BMW's horrible performance last season, their lack of sponsorship and the effect of limited financial resources in car design and construction, and the relative lack of experience in its drivers.
It's not really that impressive. 20 laps of fuel is only a modest load. This season's cars have fuel tanks with roughly 150 litres of capacity. The average fuel consumption per lap is around 2.5 to 2.7 litres per lap on most tracks. 20 laps of fuel is only around 50 to 52 litres. Since a full tank of fuel is estimated to cost 4 seconds per lap on this track (source: Barrichello), that means 20 laps of fuel equates to roughly 1.2 to 1.4 seconds of deficit.
Are you looking at different timings to the rest of us then? Explain how your maths works please. You've just said that 20 laps equates to 1.2 to 1.4 seconds, and with that taken into account, and considering that Hamilton is running 0.6 seconds slower, it means that Hamilton's effective fastest lap is 0.6 to 0.8 seconds faster than Massa's current fastest lap. How is that not impressive? According to your maths, that is.
Well no-one knows if Massa's lap was a qualifying lap or not, if it was then Hamilton's lap is certainly impressive, doesn't matter how many laps he ran but to setup a car to run 20laps instead of 2 you have to compramise alot of speed.
We shall see, no doubt Hamilton will have a go at topping the times.