Bloody hell guys.
What do you expect from an CGI movie that was mainly hyped for its effects?!
A damn opera?!
Avatar was great. When I first heard about it back in November, I laughed. I literally did. But then I went to see it, and I was blown away. I dont care if it was the story or the effects or the whole 3D experience that made this happen.... All I know is that I had a great time watching it and it entertained me.
I dont go to cinema to cry or something... If you want that, tune in to some soap opera on TV.
And before anyone says something about stories; Yes a movie does need one. And I like serious stories that make you think and all that. But for pete's sake, you knew, the lot of you, that you are not going to find one like that in this movie.... It was about pure entertainment. Thats one of the reasons why Cameron spent all those years trying to actually create equipment that would manage to create those 3h of pure orgasmic CGI goodness.
Even if a lot of people said that the story line is simply great in Avatar, with a bit of common sense you could figure out that its not about that.
And to be fair, I found the story quite fine too. Its a fantasy world which includes action, emotions, love, couragement etc. What else do you need?
I really dont see in the first place how a CGI movie is supposed to have a storyline? And whats a good storyline these days anyways? 3h about love-life and 5 guys battling it out for a girl? 2h of super-awesome one man againts whole army action kind of thing?
Rambo (Older series) was quite successful, and as far as I can remember all it had was shooting and gore and blood. Same applies for the freaking Saw franchise, over 2h of torture. Yet people somehow find that better than Avatar.
Makes me wonder. Really does.