i dont know what kind of parenting you received but my parents went to college in whats know in german as the 68 era (sort of a 60s hippie thing mixed with shooting ex nazi politicians on the right) and soaked up those ideas so im fairly sure my parenting was free of any such teachings whether conscious or unconscious
and again a hypothetical black guy my age hasnt been discriminated or enslaved in some past that happened many years ago in a country an ocean away from here and at the practically a whole world away
basically what youre saying is that you have a very pesimistic outlook on people
you also assume that children arent able to think for themself and figure out that its more likely their grandfathers or fathers are twats for what the believe instead of all black people being criminals (or whatever racist stereotype they might try to imprint on their children)
again you pretty much assume that all people are stupid and unable to figure out that anecdotal evidence is no evidence whatsoever
maybe theres something im missing here with the us population seemingly still stuck in the 50s cold war judging by the political discussions you can find all across the interweb and brits seemingly still living in some daydream of voctorian emperial glory both having missed the last 100 years or so of social and ethical development
i can assure you though that after having gotten quite a bit of a wake up call some 65 years ago the german population by and large is able to somehow survive and function without much of this pc nonsence
again mighty mighty pesimistic outlook on people in general
it doesnt even seem to occur to you that he uses this anology based on his knowledge that german can be associated with all those and not because he personally does
by your logic the reason i take the piss out of brits for their inability to shoot penalties would be because im still cross about the wembley goal that happened almost 20 years before i was born instead of the much more simple (occams razor essentially) and resonable explanation that its simply because its genuinely funny to watch them miss the goal repeatedly
Slow down a minute dude! Your presenting the idea a child has learned behaviour (racism in this example) from a parent as fact. That is not a fact but a point of view. Nature Vs Nurture by Judith Rich Harris is a very good read on the matter
I haven't read this thread I've just picked up on that point as i suspect it's a critical one.
No, it's not as simple as that, but I certainly thinks it's within the realms of possibility a child could be born with traits that may increase their chances of being what we would call 'racist'. I am certainly not saying 'kids are born racist' that's a naive over simplification of what I said.
I have suggested a highly rated book for anyone that is interested in learning more about this subject. I am not going to recite 300 pages of research and discovery.
Yep, there's a gene for everything these days. A god gene, a stupid gene, a lazy gene, a selfish gene, a narcissistic gene, an "I-ain't-got-no-money" gene, a "when the bloody hell is the next LFS patch gonna arrive" gene...a you-gene.
Ah, good call. Maybe we should all simply recommend published research that supports our points of view and then we can all go down to the library for a week and read it all.
I think its the way the media portray it for maximum effect e.g "If you have this gene you WILL die"
It certainly is perfectly reasonable to say someone with a certain gene is more likely to turn out a certain way though. Just look at identical twin studies for example. There are some remarkable findings.
Good point, I remember a case where twins had been seperated at birth each having no idea they had a twin. When they found out and met each other it turned out they had lead almost identicle lives. I can't remember what program I saw it on though, probably Horizon or something like that.
Yeah, i'm sure there is something in it, although how significant it is in a child's development will vary depending on so many other factors, i.e the parental upbringing, environment, money etc etc.
The thing that gets me is, this sort of thing tends to be used to take away the culpability and responsibility of the individual with regards to his/her future actions and mindset..."Well, i can't help being a mindless drug taking chavy thug, it's just the way i am, it's genetic". A few years ago every problem known to man was because of some sort of 'disorder'. This kids crap at maths...oh he must have a disorder, this one's no good a football, yep, he's got a disorder, this other one's a kleptomaniac, same again, a disorder, so lets all bend over backwards for these poor unfortunates and try to live around their problems, rather than telling them to work harder, try harder, or stop stealing !
This Nature v Nurture debate usually misses the point. Yes it may explain a myriad of humanistic personality traits, likes, wants and needs. But, should it ever be used as an excuse for wrong behaviour ?, should it ever be considered unchangeable ? Who said nature can't be tamed, controlled and mastered ?
A good friend of mine is well into his 40's, but he can neither read nor write (how, he's survived this long i've no idea). But non-the-less, he's got a wife, a couple of kids, and a steady job. He claims his inability to comprehend the written word is purely genetic (or maybe it's a disorder ?) yet, give him a task to do that's out of his comfort zone and if he can't do it at the first attempt, he just quits and leaves it, or even worse, if he doesn't even understand it in the first place, he won't even try. Now, thing is, he had a really really shit childhood, he never ever got any encouragement or praise for anything when he was a kid. He was the only coloured kid in his school, so he was constantly taunted by the other kids, and the teachers were very off with him too. His father left home when he was very young, and his mother, well, (i know the woman quite well, so..) all i can say is she did her best, even though she's never worked a day in her life.....So, is this nature dealing him a dodgy set of genes, or, is this nurture treating him like a worthless reject ?
I'm sure human behaviour is a result of many many differing variables, but, to blame everything on this, that or the other is a bit of a cop-out in my opinion. Why not take a bit of responsibility for our own actions, attitudes and behaviour. We are supposed to be an evolving species, after all.
It is when you consider how much time and effort is put into placing a massive importance on parenting and environmental factors in regard to child personality and behaviour including government legislation. How many times do we hear "I blame the parents""? It is an immensely complex issue though that goes to the core of out existence!
The old nature vs nuture argument, been rumbling on for decades, doubt there will even be any resolution of it.
There are obviously a certain set of hardcoded genetic parameters in all of us, but they are just the building blocks, how far they permiate into our "personallity" in later life is something thats up for debate, and has been for a dogs age.
I went to school with a kid (no, not Fat Gene) who I always thought was astonishingly thick. He never achieved anything academically, often got into fights, hung around with the other stupid, oafish kids (although he was usually quieter and less trouble than they were). The only thing I remember him doing of note at school was cutting his own name into his arm with a Stanley knife and dripping ink from a ballpoint pen in there to tattoo himself. When he left school he became an apprentice glass blower, had a kid at 17, etc.
Anyway I bumped into him recently, he's done a bachelors in computer science and he's working as a C++ developer for some code shop in Leeds. From somewhere he's suddenly also become a very articulate and engaging speaker, and he's taken up painting with oils and from what I've seen he's bloody amazing at it.
I still barely believe it. Honestly it's like he's a completely different person.
if I look back on my self 4-6 yers ago I've grown immensely, I can't believe I used to be that person. At the time if I looked bbl on myself 4-6 years previous to that: I would barely recognise myself either.
Life is a continuing state of learning and development.
Neither nature or nature will have anything like the influence over us as we have over ourselves by the time we are 30.
I am not the progeny of my genes, nor am I the progeny of the things that have happened to me...
I learned from nurture, and nature gavee me a starting point: but the person I am now is the person I chose to become.
you see the thing about history is that it happened to people whove long tunred to stinky rotten flesh and in many cases good riddance to them
the problem with assuming that history is abount to repeat itself is that its often self fullfilling and i dont want to go on a rant about positive thinking because i believe that to be baloney myself
apart from that i feel theres not much difference in prejudice against others based on race and against others based on species