I actually thought everyone would naturally assume (correctly) that I was being sarcastic.
Why anyone would think F1 is a good example of regulations regarding the implementation of aerodynamics in a single seater formula is beyond me. The devices look awkward and they're as bad as they ever were when it comes to following another car.
exactly, in F1 you'll always get teams trying to find an advantage over each other but a single manufacturer series has no excuse for going down an aero route that results in cars that have issues when following each other
hehe well it isn't outrageous for the idea of being GP2 more in line with F1 car dynamics to be agreeable, so pardon me for not reading the sarcasm
On the new car - visually the GP2 cars do look more 'advanced' and at the least better proportioned than modern F1 so really Bernie had to sort it out.
now that its basicly the same thing as the F1 they should just buy the chassis, strap a cossie engine, and upgrade the aero for f1 levels of downforce and they are done!
I think the HRT was a product of budgetary and time constraints rather than a product of how difficult it is to build an F1 car. I recall reading their were electronics under tension as well as less-than-ideal materials used in suspension components.
Of course not to say building an F1 car isn't difficult, but I don't think the HRT was a true Dallara product.
How can Schumacher say he is allready focussing on 2011?
I can imagine teams can sacrifice this years car development in favour of next year, but in what way can a driver benefit in the next year from giving up on the current one?
A driver with such a bad motivation is a waste of a seat. I think Nick Heidfeld will agree.