I just asked about because there are communities in UK that do not get involved in riots. Probably with some own authority existing and not isolated from UK society.
Not everyone is lucky enough to have their parents around to teach them values, some people have parents at work all the time just to stay afloat. The point is these riots may not necessarily be caused or motivated directly by economic or political problems and inequality, but these things helped breed the culture of disrespect that lead to these riots.
So we should let ourselves be held to ransom and extorted every time the markets take a nosedive? I can never understand how people are so quick to criticise individual people when they need some financial help, yet be so willing to give huge sums of 'free money' to organisations who then rub it in our face with huge bonuses in the face of austerity. I reckon we'd only have to go through letting the banks fail once. We'd certainly come out with a dramatically altered economy, but perhaps we need to build a more balanced economy that isn't at the mercy of the whims of these irresponsible and greedy bastards. The short term crisis may be deeper but in the longer term the UK economy would emerge fairer and more stable, and we really could say we're all in this together.
That's part of the issue, these young people have grown up being sold dreams on TV, while at the same time having the services and opportunities available to them slashed. They've been made to feel entitled yet at the same time come to realise that they can't have these dreams and opportunities. Throw in the gangsta' lifestyle sold to them which predisposes to violence, a general patronising and snobbish air amongst the better off and intrusive police tactics and you have the current situation.
There aren't any. Its about time people dropped their denial and faced the fact that irresponsible financial practice has bankrupted our country, there are those who are trying to avoid that punishment by shifting the load onto the people, David Cameron has done an impressive political job of turning what was a crisis of bad banking into one of public spending, to further his personal political agenda of representing only the wealthy, but the reality is the financial sector both home and internationally started this crisis but is making you pay for it.
I think a 500 billion (plus undisclosed tertiarry payments) bonus was a pretty big bous. I don't for one moment belief the bailouts where necessary. The first one ocurred after one bad days trading, and who's to say that wasn't as rigged as the whole shambles was. The entire bailout was a huge con. I don't have details and data on the UK bailout, but the US bailout led to half a dozen Goldman and Sachs executives and former executives ordering brand new Learjets within 6 weeks of the bailout.
The banks where not going bankrupt. At the time it received an 800 million bailout the RBS had lost 1.6m in the previous trading quarter. In the same quarter of the previous year it has made profits of 168m. The maths do not add up - are we saying that banks cannot be allowed to make a loss and that they must, at all times, be increasing their capital value?
Was that money public funding though? The point is these people were supposedly facing a crisis yet they've simply carried on their excessive ways as before, meanwhile we all have to tighten our belts for their mistakes.
5haz, you should stop making assumptions about people. The fact my parents taught me good values does not mean we were not poor. It does not mean they were always able to be there for me. It does not mean that they both didn't have to work very hard. They gave a shit and wanted me to grow up with good values.
As for the rest of it there is no point trying to reply as you'll just ignore it and spout the same old bullshit over and over again and quite frankly I'm tired of reading it.
LIES! Everyone knows poor people have no values. They are savages who beat up old ladies for their pension and sit on park benches. OH THE HUMANITY OF IT ALL!
Lets not forget helping a 14 year old to his feet just so you can rob his back pack...and then have it go viral on the net..what a sad state of affairs.
I'm offended that these " insert word" are using a Canadian devolved form of com.
Now is the time for Canada to riot to get out from under an unstable regime.
A little revelation is a good thing..it can change a society, this isn't being done to change a social program, our news tells us this started with a black youth with a gun..in England...with a gun...that's a heavy jail sentence..so the family says the cops planted the gun..what..and now..what's his name without goggling it.
This won't solve anything except make Middle England feel vindicated for a day or two (until the next outrage appears in the papers). You take away someone's house and they don't magically disappear. So we're going to have 1000 people (plus their possibly innocent families) living on the streets.
This is like anti anti-consumerism. It wasn't that long ago kids were ready to burn their Nikes in service of a saner world. These kids want Nikes. They're doing exactly what they've been told to do and it's their fault.
Well it doesn't seem like we have much choice, they do it because they want to, and there's no fear of repercussions or concequences. At the end of the day concequences are there not only as punishment but as something to fear.