When I realised that the thread about this earlier in the week wasn't actually a fake I did have a good giggle, I find it hard to believe they are allowed in the regulations, yet there they where... What an attrocity on the eyes!
Ugly cars shouldn't win, but that's ok, because they didn't.
Its funny how people moan about mods and ricers and all the suggestions. But when it comes to real life mods which are designed to go faster in whichever shape or form people still dont like it.. Brilliant. They are horrible tho...
*sauber wins race partly due to the "ugly" aero improvement*
a while later,
other team's engineer - dude, that thing is ugly...
other team's other engineer - yeah, it sucks...
- yeah haha it looks so lame haha
- totaly! it's, like, horns or something
- right! har har har!
the new aerodynamics on the car are slightly mad. The two big fins at the front of the car would piss me off they would distract me and i would not be able to drive propper. Even though the drivers say they are used to them. ferarri also brought a new aerodynamics package to the sunday race in france and it worked ming you the tires helped.
Did BMW race with that? They should have left it for off season testing. I bet people thought wings were ugly back in the 60's, so i guess whenever something new is tryed it's considered wierd.
No they won't. As stupid as the organisers and engineers in F1 sometimes are, they won't follow an aerodynamic solution that looks amateur, doesn't actually work, and is more prone to accidental damage (being on a corner of the car, rather than the middle).
We'll have 'conventional' wing positions/styles for a while yet I think, but with less visible and more effective changes to reduce the reliance on aero, and reduce the 'dirty air' effect.
They where shown in the pre-race built up though, so unless these are removable very quickly odds are they went to the grid like it, although it's entirely possible their poor performance was owing to the hacksaw blade marks interfering with the aerodynamics.