Slight problem there is the only well modeled single seater for rFactor is the W196 and if you find the FOX frustrating because you're an arcade wimp you won't like it
Also note despite their other flaws the rF3 and rTrainer both have realistically heavy engines like the FOX has been given so it won't solve your problem anyway.
ok like the title says i don't really like the new patch.............now that said, i love that you can stall your car and i love that tracks are now fixed up, but i hate how the XRT is now S1. I know a lot of fellow demo users are not to happy and have just stoped playing because they don't have the money to pay for a S1 or S2/or don't have a way to pay for it. Its cool how there is an F1 car for us but not every one who pays the game is a hard core racing game player, alot of people out there love drifting in this game..........all im saying is please bring the XRT back to demo users
People who dislike patch Y: __________________ (fill in the blank)
-"need to stick to NFS"
-"are lame demo career drivers"
-"fundamentally don't understand LFS"
:jawdrop::jawdrop::jawdrop::jawdrop: surely he cant be serious.
Wait, he IS serious and I'll stop colling him Sherley
Thank you, Boscho, for letting me know that all hope for decent people in demo is not lost
edit
oh yeah, and
i think there should be a poll for demo users to answer honestly with an "all of the above" category. Me thinks the majority of the results would be A and C
It sure sounds that way, but also I hear such thing as "it is shite as I need to adjust to change", which is same as above that includes bit more things
I posted yesterday my conclusion, but couldn't miss this one. Nope, it is not just you, is everyone who has bought that idea about LFS being a simulator. Fortunately, some of us (and please do not include me in ANY particular group) can think for ourselves and have our own idea about what LFS is.
Physics simulation is just "good" when you compare it to other sim games, and thats about it. On the other hand, it is FULL of unrealistic characteristics, some of them so lame that they should not belong to it (IF we are talking about LFS B E I N G A S I M U L A T O R).
You could read the thread in more detail if you were interested, to read ARGUMENTS, not bitching (btw, you are the one bitching here, but Im leaving that aside in my comment).
In any case, it would be good to see more developers behind LFS, and having the possibility of getting A FULL SIMULATION anytime soon.
Granted, I don't know about them, nor I understand why it has been in alpha stage for several long years.
Now, don't make a mistake. I love LFS and I like what has been done so far, but it is 1) not perfect BY FAR and 2) not as real as some of you appear to be deluded in to believe.
And just in case you can't be bothered to read some good arguments that are in here, I will tell you two things that you all should (I mean the ones who has bought the "itss a siimulaaatiooonn dduuuudeee") "bitch" about, to use one term that apparently you like.
a) What about Shift+P, how can that have its place IN A SIMULATION?
b) What about custom views? I guess thats REAL and should be included in any simulation. Right?