Im pretty sure you are totaly wrong. Nitrous is a great power adder for the drag strip.
I say as long as we have a dragstrip, who not Nitrous? Of course it would have to be configurable for jetting, tank size, wet or dry shot, port or mani injection, etc (not that many of you would know what all that is, there are alot of very ignorant people here).
And of course, you wouldent be allowed to put a 300shot on a XRG, thats totally unrealistic.
This would go very well with my discussion of a realistic automatic transmission
Some of you guys have to realize that racing covers straight line and turns. This is a racing simulator, so it would only be fair to include drag racing too. Sure this doesent have to be implimated NOW, but I say put it on the list. Along with
i don't think dtat is a good idea to use NOS in a simulations like Live For Speed .... in Live For Speed we have clean racing whit indetical cars, no stupid NOS or anything !!
cardriverx .... i newer see pro drag racers using NOS on track's
I hope ill never see NOS in Live For Speed
No real point in that since we don't even have engine tuning (not yet at least, I hope - I said tuning not modding BTW).
It should include many more types of racing, including proper drag races IMO, but certain ppl here seem to think that LFS is made exclusively for them. So since they don't like drag racing it shouldn't be in LFS. illepall
Anyway, nitrous IMO will not work too great in LFS, being a multiplayer sim mainly, not even for drag races. Adjustable turbo boost would be good tho (with more fuel consumption). Along with engine tuning...
I have to say I don't see the point in that. What racing series uses auto transmissions?
and cardriverx you got to the topic of drag racing before I could
Nitrous is just another method of forced induction...boost in a bottle. Its not NOS!!!@1!! either, NOS is a brand. It would be quite fun for the drag strip to have different stages and amounts to mess with. Anywhere other than the drag strip (or on unapropriate cars) would be meaningless though.
Also, to anyone who thinks a manual transmission is instantly superior to an automatic...stop being so naive
Well i usually watch british F3 thought GP2 was what hamilton was in and think it is different to F3 but not sure. And yeah as far as im aware i think they do palmer audi does, it has an extra boost gives you 50bhp extra for 20 seconds or something and you only use 6 during a race.
boosted applications, you don't lose boost when shifting
drag racing = far superior with an automatic vs a standard manual trans. Its much more consistent for bracket racing, doesn't have a clutch to fry, can do a better power brake burnout, and again, if the car is boosted.
Also, you get better launches. Even underpowered commuter cars with manual trans can spin the tires on launch with a full throttle clutch dump.
Yes, you lose about another 5 or so % in driveline efficiency
many people discredit drag racing as an actual form of racing though, so I doubt many people will even accept this logic.
A sequential box with ingnition cut also lets you shift without losing boost. Due to lack of a clutch and having a torque converter instead you run into problems at higher powered cars, for example losing more possible torque at higher torque levels. I also doubt the better burnout capabilties of an auto tranny, I can't see a reason why that should be.
I also isn't really better for launches, if you're not being a complete retard you won't spin the tyres during a launch. The reason why your automatic doesn't spin the tyres is, because it wastes at lot of the inertia on the torque converter. So it is worse in starting than a properly handled manual box.
And drag racing (unlike drifting) is won by being faster, making it a form of racing. Even if I find it even more boring than oval racing, but that's only my kind of thinking.
Nobody said that... But they are. For ppl who didn't learn to shift from their grandmother and never tried to improve at least.
This can be done just the same with a manual.
Actually a few auto transmissions are more durable than certain manuals. I agree they're also more consistent, and they're also easier on high powered cars where controlling the car is a job on it's own. But manuals are faster in smaller categories.
Hmm... Not on the dragstrip. Underpowered cars will even have difficulty starting IRL. And again, you must have learned from your grandmother to launch full throttle with just a clutch dump.
I assume you're talking about the auto?
Uhm... So it isn't a racing form??? And it's furthermore discredited to be called that? What is it, a circus? It is you who discredits it my friend. Just so you know, drag racing is an official FIA championship.