The online racing simulator
Another hopefully brief diatribe by me (not sure what that word means or if it's spelled correctly, but i like to give Tristan reasons to poke fun at me )

Quote from JamesF1 :non-Christians seem so keen to try and disprove God and the Bible with science… when the very nature of God is that He is supernatural. Being supernatural means that you don’t have to conform to the physical boundaries imposed on humankind.

First off, you seem to be assuming i'm a non-christian

Then you berate me (although pleasantly ) for using scientific reasoning to disprove Biblical events, yet in the quote below you ask me to prove the ark is technically impossible to build. Just exactly how am i supposed to do that without quoting scientific data ?

Quote from JamesF1 : I suppose you have some structural proof for this? We, as humankind, have built far bigger wooden structures than the supposed dimensions of the ark.

Ok, i'll try.

The worlds largest wooden building is something called the Superior Dome (according to google) Do you think it would float ?, It's apparently 530ft in diameter, which oddly enough is approximately the same length as Noah's Ark (depending on which definition of a cubit you use). and, just for reference, the smallest measurement for a cubit still has the ark being at least 450ft long.

The largest wooden ship built which can actually be verified was approx 360 ft in length. Problem was, it didn't float, it wasn't seaworthy.

The largest wooden ship built (again verified) that didn't have a metal re-enforced hull or bulkheads was approx 330ft. An American schooner called Wyoming. This DID float and WAS seaworthy, and was actually used for a while, until it was taken out into rough seas. Then they discovered that the shear length of it caused the hull to flex so much that the timber joints would twist and buckle and invariably let the water in. So to keep it afloat, the water had to be constantly pumped out, luckily for the crew, water pumps had been invented by then as this was in the early 20th century. Unfortunately, it sank in 1924 in heavy seas and all hands were lost.

Ok, so you may say Noah would have assigned someone to man the pumps in the Ark. How many of the eight people on board do you think would be needed to pump out the incoming water by hand on something approaching the size of that Super Dome thing posted above ? for the entire time they spent in the ark, one whole year. In freezing temperature, in storms the like of which this world has never seen, twenty four hours a day.

You may say, "well God must have used his supernatural abilities to make it completely water tight", he could have, he's God, he can do that if he wants, how can i prove otherwise ? Then why couldn't he have used his supernatural abilities to rid the world of all these unpleasant sinners that had come to grieve him so much. Why use the very naturally occurring concept of death by drowning. He could have simply clicked his fingers, or perhaps more accurately, spoken the words and boom, no more nasty people. What had the animals done to upset him so much, and had the plants turned to follow a different God ?, why would he want to kill everything ? If it was to rid the world of sin, then it sure didn't work !. And why even do it in the first place when his plan right from the outset was to send Jesus to atone for the sins of everyone, past, present and future ?

Ahh man this is such a huge topic, there are so many different ways i could take this and so many topics i could mention, but i'm trying to be brief.

Lets talk about the water, but lets not get into where it came from, or where did it go. Lets discuss the volume, time to get your calculator out again. (maths has never been my strong point so please feel free to correct any errors)

The radius of the Earth is approx. 6370km
The height of Everest above sea-level is approx. 8.8 km
Therefore, the volume of the Earth is approx. 1,082,696,932,000km³, or 1,080 billion cubic kilometers.
The volume of the earth to the height of Everest is 1,087,190,293,000km³
Subtracting the first volume from the second gives approx. 4,493,361,000, or four thousand, five hundred million cubic kilometers of water!
Also, this rain is supposed to have fallen within about 40 days. That means that there would have been about 220 metres of rainfall every day over the entire planet

(hehe sorry, but i cheated, dats an obvious c&p :shhh

But think about it, 220 metres of rain everyday falling from the sky. I can't even imagine what that must be like. The biggest downpour i remember was no more than a couple of inches in a few hours, and that was considered extreme weather, it actually caused structural damage. Think of 220 metres of rain pouring down in a day, on top and to the sides of the ark. It would have taken one hell of a beating. I'd imagine very similar to a police water cannon. And that would have lasted 24hrs a day for 40 days, non stop. Could a wooden structure take that much abuse ? Any engineers fancy having a go at calculating the force/energy impacting the upper uncovered deck of the boat ?

But i guess God supernaturally protected them, sure was a good day to be Noah.

Then, lets say they survived and found themselves on day 41 bobbing up and down on the ocean at 30,000 feet. Damn i bet that was a bit nippy, only natural gas from 30 million animals for central heating, and no land mass at all to calm the winds, and a 24hr day job of pumping out the incoming water, feeding the animals, cleaning out all the poop, stopping them from eating one another, exercising them (can't have them standing up or sitting in one location for a whole year, otherwise they'd develop pressure sores, which are not only very very unpleasant, but can be life threatening too, and you can't have a bunch of wild animals running wild on a moving boat, so they'd have to be supervised), praying seven times a day, making all the tradition offerings and sacrifices to God, getting some sleep, having a bite to eat, washing, etc etc . Was this salvation or punishment for poor old Noah and his Chinese children. (one of the eight on the boat must have been Chinese, where else could they have come from ?)

Seriously though, just think of the logistical nightmare of doing all of this with only 8 people, 4 of them women.

Here's something to think about, and it's only my personal theory/question, but what would happen to the earth if it mass was pushed out to a height of 30,000ft. Water is very very heavy, so wouldn't that mean a much larger weight was at the surface than the centre ?. Would that mean the earth would slow down (bit like when you're on a roundabout and you lean out, it slows down). And if it did slow down, what kind of problems would that create ? longer days, greater temperature differences from day to night. severe winds, increased electrical storms ?

I've started to ramble now so i'll leave this here, and make another post at a later stage. There's still so much i'd like to say, but i'm finding it difficult to condense everything into readable posts.

Later

p.s sorry, it's late and i can't be bothered to check for spelling/grammar/punctuation mistakes. But i did try very hard to cut out any scientific fact and dogma. It may not have been my best post, but all i'm trying to do is get you to look at these things from a logical, rational point of view, rather than "the bible said it happened that way, so it must be true

You are perfectly right in saying God is outside of nature and natural physical laws so therefore is not constrained by them. But unfortunately we in our fleshy little bag of bones and guts are constrained by them, we can't escape them, and neither can our boats, cars, planes, wallets, girlfriends, wives and lovers. God apparently created these natural laws, and if he suddenly decided to bend, twist and change them for our benefit, then where would that leave us ?
Quote from Shotglass :what exactly are you trying to prove by "quoting" a ficticious person?

HERETIC!!!!
#53 - J.B.
I'm not going to address everything (see bottom of the post).

Quote from Mazz4200 :But please do yourself a favour and do some research on those particular scholars, especially Josephus. Who incidentally was born after the crucifixion, so by the very nature of erm, nature, couldn't have given an eyewitness account of Jesus and his doings. Oddly enough Nero was born the same year as Josephus, so obviously he wasn't around when Jesus was 'alive' either.

I realise that neither of them were born when Jesus was alive - but most so-called 'reliable' historical references were at least second-hand. Few historical documents were actually told by people who experienced them first-hand. In this case, there are four, separate, obvious first-hand accounts of Jesus' existence - but apparently (to you) these don't count... even when historical evidence is classed as 'reliable' after two agreeing documents.

Quote :So, when Two and a quarter million of them suddenly pack their bags one day and leave the country

No, they were let go.

Quote :So, on one day approximately half the population of a country emigrates, and not one single Egyptian scholor bothers to mention it ? odd don't you think ?

You do realise how big Egypt was at the time? And you do realise that the Egyptians lived in entirely different 'lands' (the word used as best translation in English) from the Israelites? And you also realise that the Israelites were not counted in the population of Egyptians? And, finally, you realise that embarrassing and shameful Egyptian historical events were often not written, or struck from the records (as Hank previously mentioned, too, I think)? Thought not.

Quote from Hankstar :Referring a non-believer to scripture is as effective as shooting blanks

Well, you started us on Scripture by saying that God would/could send you to Hell... you made several scriptural assertions and references with that sentiment. I was replying in kind.

Quote :the fact that Pharaoh would've been drowned as well only strengthens it!

So if only the Israelites lived to see it, and they dashed off rather sharp-ish to escape the area... who do you think they stopped to tell along the way for the convenience of the history records?

Quote from Mazz4200 : Then you berate me (although pleasantly ) for using scientific reasoning to disprove Biblical events, yet in the quote below you ask me to prove the ark is technically impossible to build. Just exactly how am i supposed to do that without quoting scientific data ?

You started it by saying you had some proof... so I was just waiting to hear it. Personally, I don't believe science can disprove God... but I was interested to know what you had to say, regardless.

Quote :*Copy-paste*

I like what you said:
Quote :
But i guess God supernaturally protected them, sure was a good day to be Noah.

Pretty much sums it up. And I suppose your data takes into account all possible constructions of wooden boat given the amount and type of timber available to Noah, the sealing and joining methods, and the condition of the seas? Yeah... thought not.

Quote :eight people on board

We have no statistics on the number of daughters or son-in-law's Noah had... only eight people were mentioned directly, but the way the 'passenger list' is written implies omitted parties (commonplace in historical reporting, only mention culturally-relevant parties).

Quote :Then why couldn't he have used his supernatural abilities to rid the world of all these unpleasant sinners that had come to grieve him so much.

He did... He flooded the world - or did you miss that?


There are so many other points that could be addressed from your text - but I think I'll just leave you to your speculations. You contradict yourself even within the same post, and seem keen to switch sides of the fence to suit your argument. One minute you play "God can do anything" to bypass something you can't explain, and the next you say "How does this work? Physics doesn't allow it." to try and explain something else away.

I really do feel sorry for you, that you spend so much time simply trying to disprove something that cannot be disproven. Regardless of how this discussion turns out, it won't change how I see God - because He is far more than scientific 'proof' to me. As such, I'm not going to get further dragged into a pointless debate.

Good discussion, though
Quote from Mazz4200 :Another hopefully brief diatribe by me (not sure what that word means or if it's spelled correctly, but i like to give Tristan reasons to poke fun at me )

I'm not into using the word diatribe on a regular basis (though I spout them often enough), but I believe it's spelt correctly.

And a nice post. Just enough 'detail' to make the point, without resorting to waffle, bloat or silliness. Me likes!

Can I add? Thanks.

If God (god?) was punishing (or whatever) all the creatures of the land and air by flooding the seas, what did the sea life do that didn't warrant such abuse (ignoring the massive sea climate change such flooding would have caused - and if it was, then why didn't Noah have to have fish (and whale?) tanks onboard the Ark? So, assuming that they were a bit of an oversight of God (god? He is only one of many, because I certainly can't believe all these DIFFERENT religions INTEND to worship the same single God, and some religions actually have many Gods), then wouldn't a long drought be better, with a nice little oasis for Noah and his, err, campsite? Keep two of every species (and sub-species) in a little palm-tree lined (but reasonably temperate) play area, whilst everything else died of dehydration including fish, mammals and all of that?


Next thing. If the world, according to scripture, is only a few thousand years old, then why would God/god bother to make fossils, and evidence (in our minds at least) of things happening before this. Wouldn't it have been a bit easier to just make the history happen. Sure it would have taken a bit longer, but it would have been less work. Maybe he was in a rush that week?
#56 - Jakg
All you guys need to go out and read "The Gospel Of The Flying Spaghetti Monster".

Kev has, and now he's seen the inner glowing light instilled in all of us by his glorious noodly apendage.
Quote from JamesF1 :I realise that neither of them were born when Jesus was alive - but most so-called 'reliable' historical references were at least second-hand. Few historical documents were actually told by people who experienced them first-hand. In this case, there are four, separate, obvious first-hand accounts of Jesus' existence - but apparently (to you) these don't count... even when historical evidence is classed as 'reliable' after two agreeing documents.

Chinese whispers and rose-tinted spectacles of those second-hand reporters?
Quote from JamesF1 :No, they were let go.

Ah, that's alright then.
Quote from JamesF1 :You do realise how big Egypt was at the time? And you do realise that the Egyptians lived in entirely different 'lands' (the word used as best translation in English) from the Israelites? And you also realise that the Israelites were not counted in the population of Egyptians? And, finally, you realise that embarrassing and shameful Egyptian historical events were often not written, or struck from the records (as Hank previously mentioned, too, I think)? Thought not.

Except that the Nile is mentioned by name I believe, and that has always been in Egypt.
Quote from JamesF1 :Well, you started us on Scripture by saying that God would/could send you to Hell... you made several scriptural assertions and references with that sentiment. I was replying in kind.

He can refer you to scripture as you believe in it. You cannot do the same to him as he doesn't (probably).
Quote from JamesF1 :You started it by saying you had some proof... so I was just waiting to hear it. Personally, I don't believe science can disprove God... but I was interested to know what you had to say, regardless.

I think it's pretty damn reasonable to assume that mankind was not able to build an Ark before or after the supposed time. Considering the progress we've made since in all areas of engineering it's probably safe to assume it isn't technically possible, otherwise it would have been reattempted. However, I haven't done 'the math', it's just a feeling from looking at wooden structural limitations.
Quote from JamesF1 :Pretty much sums it up. And I suppose your data takes into account all possible constructions of wooden boat given the amount and type of timber available to Noah, the sealing and joining methods, and the condition of the seas? Yeah... thought not.

One has to assume he didn't have an infinite amount of wood, and nor was it in a carefully prepared condition. Sealing and jointing methods would have been primative, relying on fit more than anything. Wattle and Daube isn't known for it's longevity or it's sealing powers. The condition of the seas, knowing what we do about weather systems on several planets including our own, would MORE THAN LIKELY have been terrible MOST OF THE TIME, and certainly MORE THAN A WOODEN SHIP LOADED WITH 30 MILLION ANIMALS could take SOME of the time. Just because Mazz hasn't considered every eventuality in boat engineering doesn't mean it's possible
Quote from JamesF1 :We have no statistics on the number of daughters or son-in-law's Noah had... only eight people were mentioned directly, but the way the 'passenger list' is written implies omitted parties (commonplace in historical reporting, only mention culturally-relevant parties).

Okay, lets call it 50 people. Enough to do all those things? I think not. You'd need a crew of several thousand if not more to achieve it.
Quote from JamesF1 :
He did... He flooded the world - or did you miss that?

He flooded the world, made a man (or some men) make a ship to sail the treacherous seas for a year, spending at least a couple of months in rain that would shatter skin, whilst keeping a pair of every species? Why not just point a finger at the ones he didn't like. Or write a God Macro to do it automatically. Or something equally Godlike but a lot simpler. Or was he just showing off?
Quote from JamesF1 :There are so many other points that could be addressed from your text - but I think I'll just leave you to your speculations. You contradict yourself even within the same post, and seem keen to switch sides of the fence to suit your argument. One minute you play "God can do anything" to bypass something you can't explain, and the next you say "How does this work? Physics doesn't allow it." to try and explain something else away.

He keeps saying God can do anything because, according to 'believers' he can. He's using YOUR (collectively, not specifically) argument to make you see how silly it looks.
Quote from JamesF1 :I really do feel sorry for you, that you spend so much time simply trying to disprove something that cannot be disproven. Regardless of how this discussion turns out, it won't change how I see God - because He is far more than scientific 'proof' to me. As such, I'm not going to get further dragged into a pointless debate.

And I'm sure he (and I) feel sorry for you that you have become so closed minded to believe that it cannot be disproven, that you believe the lies and inconsistencies in 'The Bible', and that you choose to align yourself with the biggest pact of murderers the world has ever known. Must be great.
Quote from JamesF1 :Good discussion, though

Indeed. As long as we remember we are referring to GROUPS of people (Theists vs Atheists if you like) rather than each other individually then we can remain polite and nice to each other the same time.

I do, intently, hope that you James, or anyone reading with similar alignments do not take personal offence, as it is NOT directed at you, merely the collective whole. I cannot stress that enough.
keep going guys ... nothing more enjoyable than a pointless discussion with someone blind enough to take parables as historically accurate
Quote from JamesF1 :I realise that neither of them were born when Jesus was alive - but most so-called 'reliable' historical references were at least second-hand. Few historical documents were actually told by people who experienced them first-hand. In this case, there are four, separate, obvious first-hand accounts of Jesus' existence - but apparently (to you) these don't count... even when historical evidence is classed as 'reliable' after two agreeing documents.

Josephus was a Jewish historian and a prolific writer, yet he only mentioned Jesus in two very short passages in his twenty one volume "Antiquities of the Jews", published in 93 AD, thirty years after the four gospels were published. I'll let you draw your own conclusion there.

As a brief aside here's an interesting little fact showing this chaps character. He and 40 of his comrades were trapped in a cave surrounded by the roman army (obviously after blood). So they all decided to commit suicide rather than face capture. They drew lots to see who would kill whom and acted accordingly. Josephus and one other chap were the last two left. Josephus then decided he didn't much fancy dying that day, so convinced the other bloke they should both surrender, which they duly did. Later in life he became a Roman citizen and changed his name to Josephus. (not judging the guy, but thought it was an interesting fact worthy of a mention.


Quote from JamesF1 : You do realise how big Egypt was at the time? And you do realise that the Egyptians lived in entirely different 'lands' (the word used as best translation in English) from the Israelites? And you also realise that the Israelites were not counted in the population of Egyptians? And, finally, you realise that embarrassing and shameful Egyptian historical events were often not written, or struck from the records

Seems they also wrote the global flood out of their history books too, and just carried on with everyday life building their pyramids and worshiping cats (or what ever it was). Go check the historical Egyptian records, you'll not find any large gaps that coincided with the great flood. Which is odd when you think how long it would take to re-populate an entire nation and carry on with the same culture, religion and daily practices identical to the pre-flood generation.

Quote from JamesF1 : So if only the Israelites lived to see it, and they dashed off rather sharp-ish to escape the area... who do you think they stopped to tell along the way for the convenience of the history records?

Dashed off rather sharpish ? How can two and a quarter million people dash off rather sharpish ? and seeing as they wandered around a peninsular less than 100miles across at it's widest point for 40 years. They shouldn't have been too hard to find. All the pursuers had to do was follow the trail of litter and animal waste. Quite logical when you think about it. All the dead soldiers would have left family and friends behind, i'm sure some of them would have liked to know what had happened, and maybe even exact revenge ?

Quote from JamesF1 : You started it by saying you had some proof... so I was just waiting to hear it. Personally, I don't believe science can disprove God... but I was interested to know what you had to say, regardless.

My mistake then, i thought you didn't want a load of scientific data thrown at you. So i tried to answer with logical, rational observations rather than mind numbingly boring spread sheets of the load bearing properties of naturally occurring materials. But as Tristan said below, it's not such a leap of faith to assume that if it's technically impossible to build a seaworthy ark with todays engineering and scientific knowledge, then it's reasonable to assume it wasn't possible 5,000yrs ago, by someone using very rudimentary tools, and no experience of boat building let alone construction. He lived in a dessert, and there's a very real change he may have never even seen the sea (but thats just conjecture on my behalf, so don't worry about it). Perhaps Noah spent too much time preaching the word of God after the flood that he forgot to pass on the knowledge of how to build really big boats. Shame that, it could of come in handy, especially when the Australian Aboriginal members of the family wanted to emigrate with all those uniquely weird and wonderful creatures.

Quote from JamesF1 : And I suppose your data takes into account all possible constructions of wooden boat given the amount and type of timber available to Noah, the sealing and joining methods, and the condition of the seas? Yeah... thought not.

Just a quick reply to the joints. God told Noah to use reeds in between the panel gaps in the hull (as was common practice in those days) and not pitch (a waterproof resin) which many biblical historians claim. This is down to a mis-translation of biblical text and can be explained by the mere fact that pitch hadn't been discovered by that point in history. I'll leave it up to you to determine whether reeds would be able to withstand the enormous forces being applied to them as the boat twisted and buckled in the fiercest sea storms and in the most extreme weather conditions in the planets history, in a DIY boat, built by a preacher.

Quote from JamesF1 : We have no statistics on the number of daughters or son-in-law's Noah had... only eight people were mentioned directly, but the way the 'passenger list' is written implies omitted parties (commonplace in historical reporting, only mention culturally-relevant parties).

Yes, thats a fact, and it's something the bible does on many occasions. But, i'd be interested to know which scripture you have in mind when you say it "implies omitted parties". However, lets remember the bible also states that Noah's 3 sons will be the forefathers of the nations, meaning all future offspring will descend from them and them alone, implying there were no other blokes on board.

Quote from JamesF1 : [size=+1][size=2]
He did... He flooded the world - or did you miss that?

Apparently !. As did the Egyptians as mentioned above. And also the Chinese dynasty seemed to miss it to, and the Sumerian dynasty, and the Minoan dynasty, and a couple of others i cant remember the name of.

Quote from JamesF1 : There are so many other points that could be addressed from your text - but I think I'll just leave you to your speculations. You contradict yourself even within the same post, and seem keen to switch sides of the fence to suit your argument. One minute you play "God can do anything" to bypass something you can't explain, and the next you say "How does this work? Physics doesn't allow it." to try and explain something else away.

Tristan answered that in his above post.

Quote from JamesF1 : I really do feel sorry for you, that you spend so much time simply trying to disprove something that cannot be disproven. Regardless of how this discussion turns out, it won't change how I see God - because He is far more than scientific 'proof' to me. As such, I'm not going to get further dragged into a pointless debate.

Ahhh, you feel sorry for me, thats nice. And just for that, i'll let all the patronising little quips you've made, slide .

Seriously, you seem a really decent sort James, and respect to you for fighting your corner in a level headed and erudite manner, and resisted the temptation of petty bitching and name calling which so many of these types of thread seem to end up in. Mazz waits for the piss taking comment from Kev
I know for certain that there's nothing I, Hank, Tristan or anyone may say that'll change your own personal beliefs. and perhaps that's the way it should be, because personal beliefs are just that, personal.
You can only find the answers when you're will to go seek them for yourself, which is refreshing in this day and age when so many folk just blindly accept everything the nice looking man or woman on the telly tells them.
The important thing to remember is, never stop asking those questions, never stop searching, and don't ever be afraid to admit that you can sometimes get things wrong, make mistakes and believe wrong information. Hell, i still believe that big pointy lottery hand thing when he tells me "It could be you"

Quote from JamesF1 : Good discussion, though

Have to admit, i still find it hard to have a proper discussions over this interwebnet thingy. I'm very much from a generation of sitting in a pub and having a right old barny over a few pints. So i constantly find i never quite say things on here exactly the way i'd like. And to be honest, i still find it very unnatural to read from a computer screen, and i still havn't figured out what half these buttons just above this typing box do ?, it's a complete mystery to me. But, that's just me being a grumpy old git, h'rumph and bah humbug and all that.
What has a psalm got to do with a bible?
Cheers Tristan

You raise some good points.

Here's something you may find interesting.

The diet of the Koala bear is solely the leaves from the eucalyptus tree, which are native to Australia/Tasmania/New Guinea/Indonesia and The Philippines. (and there's no historical record, no fossil evidence, no seed or anything to even remotely suggest that at any stage of the earths history these trees grew anywhere else.)

And yet, Koala's only live in the Eastern and Southern regions of Australia and as far inland as the woodland goes, (a few hundred miles i guess ?) According to fossil and bone records etc they havn't even ventured as far as Western Australia or Tasmania. Like the eucalyptus tree, there's no evidence whatsoever that even remotely suggests they lived anywhere else on the planet in their entire evolutionary/creationist history.

So the bible somehow expects us to believe a couple of them packed a years supply of eucalyptus leaves, traveled the 9,000 miles to the Middle East, went sailing for a year, traveled 9,000 miles back to Southern Australia, and didn't leave one single piece of evidence of the journey. Not one single footprint in a world that would have been knee deep in soft ocean silt, not one turd, not one half eaten eucalyptus leaf, not a single bone, not a single fossil, not one single thing. Beggars belief doesn't it

And this isn't an isolated case either. We can add all the other marsupials found in Oz. All the flightless birds from New Zealand (wow just think, they'd have to swim 1200miles just to reach Australia !!) The Dodo from Mauritius. The Elephant Bird and the Three Toed Sloth from Madagascar. Hundreds of species of lizard from South American. A unique species of fish that only live in a particular land locked lake in Asia (they must have walked) And the list goes on and on...

But, as with so many things, it all boils down to belief, if someone wants to believe something no matter how effing stupid and improbable it sounds, then they'll go right ahead and believe it.

Usually the desire for God to be real is enough to make him genuinely real in the mind of the believer.
To lighten the mood, I found something to make the piss with:

Quote from Mazz4200 :He lived in a dessert

What type? A trifle? A sponge cake? Perhaps an eclair?
Quote from Mazz4200 :...And this isn't an isolated case either. We can add all the other marsupials found in Oz. All the flightless birds from New Zealand (wow just think, they'd have to swim 1200miles just to reach Australia !!) The Dodo from Mauritius. The Elephant Bird and the Three Toed Sloth from Madagascar. Hundreds of species of lizard from South American. A unique species of fish that only live in a particular land locked lake in Asia (they must have walked) And the list goes on and on...

I was going to say the additional species we had today (or had since the flood) must have evolved from what was saved on the Ark. But evolution isn't allowed under His Holy Law, so it can't have been. The same thing caused Darwin some issues, because he was an incredibly devout Christian (more so than, say, James), yet also came up with a theory that conflicted with it. When people call evolution Darwinism, and put it 'against' religion they forget that Darwin was FOR religion, and not against it in the slightest.
Mazz, I'd be quite willing to discuss this further with you over a drink - as I'm quite similar in 'discussion style' to yourself. Forums never have been useful for these kinds of debates.
Quote from tristancliffe :To lighten the mood, I found something to make the piss with:



What type? A trifle? A sponge cake? Perhaps an eclair?

http://imaginarygrace.blogspot ... ical-dessert-recipie.html

no flies on me thank the lord for google and broadband, for getting me out of a potentially embarrassing situation there, lol

Quote from tristancliffe :I was going to say the additional species we had today (or had since the flood) must have evolved from what was saved on the Ark. But evolution isn't allowed under His Holy Law, so it can't have been. The same thing caused Darwin some issues, because he was an incredibly devout Christian (more so than, say, James), yet also came up with a theory that conflicted with it. When people call evolution Darwinism, and put it 'against' religion they forget that Darwin was FOR religion, and not against it in the slightest.

Nah, they've already worked on an answer for the theory of evolution, they thought up their own version http://atheism.about.com/od/ev ... plained/a/micro_macro.htm

But it's right what you say about Darwin, he was actually trying to explain the anomalies he found between the written word of God and those he witnessed within nature, with the intention of verifying the word of God. Unfortunately it didn't quite work out as he planned and took so much stick from his christian brethren he almost had a nervous breakdown. However in later life he apparently turned his back on christianity altogether (partly due to the death of his daughter) but perhaps it was mainly due to him coming to his senses, and finally admitting that it was a whole load of tosh, and life simply couldn't be as described in the biblical account.


Quick edit, Actually James i don't drink anymore, gave it up years ago, kept getting drunk and acting like a complete tosser, and i found it's better to be fully sober when acting like a complete tosser (means you can run away quicker when someones about to smack you in the mouth . And I'm old git as well yunno, just turned 39 a few days ago, dunno how old you are, but if your in your teens i'd feel a bit uncomfortable with that. And, which part of the UK do you live ? don't really fancy driving 300 miles just for a chat when me next door neighbour's a couple of yards away (no offense meant, with that statement )
Ahh, the extent of my drinking is a single drink of something every once-in-a-while
I live near Cardiff, so if you're ever in the area, let me know
It's about a 6hr drive from here, so just nipping down there isn't really on the cards. But the ex wife lives in Shrewsbury which i guess ain't too far, so if i ever get summoned to go visit her, i'll give you a buzz
Sounds like a plan
Quote from shaun463 :What has a psalm got to do with a bible?

They're songs, based on the Psalm chapter of the bible.
Personally I can't wait until somebody has their insurance company refuse to pay out on a claim because it was "An Act of God"...then for that person to take the insurance company to court to prove that:

a) There IS a God,
and
b) That God caused the damage.

Will sure make for an interesting case
If only I had more time these days... Consider yourselves fortunate enough to have been spared a wall of text 30 large units of measurement tall!

(my fingers are glad too actually)
to sum it up a little which side of the fence are you on? you look a lot like jesus on roids which might be a clue but im not convinced
http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?p=405907#post405907

For the clickologically lazy, I used to be on Tristan's side every bit as vehemently (stubbornly) as he is, and many others are. 13 years ago that all changed. I'm pleased as punch to appear stupid to the professed wise for what I know to be true (er, sorry - "beleive")

LOL, they didn't have roids in biblical times did they? Didn't need them with all that silly walking and lifting things!

I'll have to get my old avatar back; that's kind of a compliment in a wierd sort of way... I think....
Quote from Ball Bearing Turbo :If only I had more time these days... Consider yourselves fortunate enough to have been spared a wall of text 30 large units of measurement tall!

(my fingers are glad too actually)

Go ahead, join in, the more the merrier.

As long as you use punctuation i don't mind reading walls of text

And what else are you gonna use you're fingers for, if not for typing. (on second thoughts, best not answer that one :razz

FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG