I agree, actually, but I don't think we can reasonably tackle those and knock them on the head if lerts' propensity for new and oft-regarded-as-spam threads remain unchecked.
There's those that think lerts posts spam and those that don't. Not everyone agrees, even among the mods. Personally I consider the *frequency* of new threads of "tentative value" from single individuals when appraising threads as spam or not, and in the case of lerts and his threads it's excessive in my opinion. I reserve the right to have one, still.
Grouping the threads into one and handing it over to lerts to do with as he will is the best compromise. This way, anyone that doesn't find value in threads like this (such as me, for example) just have one thread to keep out of instead of a whole subforum.
In your opinion. Personally I think it should have been posted like this in the first place, so that way we wouldn't have had any reports of spam and I wouldn't have felt any need whatsoever to get involved.
all right what if everybody was more than one person at the same time, for example like pleasentville wher the bartender and the hustband of the lady is the same person, thats why she fells in love with both, or this video:
in fact why when i play i lean my head to compensate for g forces if there are no g forces, hey maybe another me is a real race pilot and thats why i like it so much, but i must be someone slow, humm maybe hamilton
yep its an onnion that like truth has several layers
my point is that media could invent a war to hide sexual life of the president and people wouldnt know, or could invent climate change due to co2(which is an astronomical event) to mislead people from important issues
havent you read batman dark night 2 it falls within the posible, how do you know bush have mass, have you hold him?
i think bush has no control over the world, you should have watched the stonecutters spisode of the simpsons, he is a puppet
bush and kerry are cousins, studied in the same university and belonged to the same brotherhood, what a choice, do you prefer to be treaded on by the shoe or the boot
nowadays it wouldnt be difficult to edit any news, images arent proof of anything any more
for example this fake news in which an arabian boy had his arm treaded on by a lorry for having stolen bread in front of everybody, it was aired by the cnn
well if you are so smart as to know wowow a fake you should know that cnn story is a fake as well, why? because 100 people wouldnt look indiferently how a lorry passes by an 8 year old boy, i think it was proofed this new was a fake
How do you know that Bush doesn't have mass? Have you held him? Stop spamming your "ideas" that you are just stealing from science fiction books and cartoons. What's next? Are you going to start telling us that Superman really exists?
well i just question wether media is telling the truth or not
another example of media invention is people sunbathing on the beach in front of death inmigrants, it was proofed it was photoshopped
and as for superman existing wait till someone finds a way to attain 100% usage of the brain,telekinesis, bilocation, telepathy, mind timetravel,reading a book in a 10th of a second
superman would pale in front of what is posible for an enlightened person
I suggest you consider using 1% first. Even 0.001% would be a start. Let normal people who aren't hooked on mind-bending drugs consider the possibility of more.