I can say I've never thought about it.
I just answered the question for both of us....
I can say I've never thought about it.
I just answered the question for both of us....
I would like to say I'm a realist, i.e., I might be a bit more negative than positive. 
Never under estimate the power of positive thought EVER.
i try to be always positive
in fact what i dislike about the world i change it in my mind and make it to my likeness, i fantasize with negative actually in the deep being positive
in fact i proved on the paper that you can have an action of 100000 and a reaction of just 1
theres much more positive in the world than negative besides what the news want to show
in fact what i dislike about the world i change it in my mind and make it to my likeness, i fantasize with negative actually in the deep being positive
in fact i proved on the paper that you can have an action of 100000 and a reaction of just 1
theres much more positive in the world than negative besides what the news want to show
But you know, 1 negative is more harming/able to do action that one positive. In fact we counted it some, in companies that sells services, one negative comment / custommer usually or in avarage affects 3 others, meaning that it's 4 negative. The positive person are positive, and don't feel the urge to do anything specially, so they don't spread anger around, or feel like saying things that might affect them.
I think it's a lot alike other rellations.
I used to be very negative. Now I think I mostly just play the part of a depressive misanthrope, but I don't really know where the act ends and I begin.
I think I generally have faith in other humans, but my method of encouraging them to behave how I'd like them to behave involves a lot of deliberate negative postulation and supposition.
I think I generally have faith in other humans, but my method of encouraging them to behave how I'd like them to behave involves a lot of deliberate negative postulation and supposition.
The glass is neither half empty nor half full.
It has a technical fault and needs refilling.
It has a technical fault and needs refilling.
OMG, Don't use words I don't know!
I'm positively realistic (or realistically positive)
I mean, I'm realistic in a positive way, and positive in a realistic way
I mean, I'm realistic in a positive way, and positive in a realistic way
No I am a positive person.
opportunityisnowhere
Mathematician: If ½Full = ½Empty, then we can cancel out the half on both sides and therefore:
Full = Empty
I'm a bit of a perfectionalist.
So to me, the example of the water bottle being used, must be half filled with water, if stated half full. If its not, its either more empty or more full, to the complete, most tiny degree of extra water.
James Allen: The bottle is Senna-esque!
So to me, the example of the water bottle being used, must be half filled with water, if stated half full. If its not, its either more empty or more full, to the complete, most tiny degree of extra water.
James Allen: The bottle is Senna-esque!
James Allen: And Hamilton has drunk half of the water, Hamilton drinks a lot of water, Hamilton says that Ayrton Senna used to drink water. And Hamilton is having another sip now! That's a shot of Jenson Button but we dont love him any more, stupid director show us Hamilton that's what we want to see! And there he is, it's Hamilton, the glass is almost to Hamilton's mouth now as Hamilton prepares to take another sip! Oh yes, he's done it, Hamilton has Hamiltoned the glass of water! Nice one son!
Intrepid: If you are truely commited the bottle will be full, I've seen it through my own very eyes.
Chinese Government: The glass will be ready on time.
British Government: The state of full/empty glass was captured on CCTV.
American Government: Whether it is half full or half empty should be decided democratically, with force used to achieve that end.
United Nations: The glass has the right to declare for itself whether it is half full or half empty.
European Union: See under section 12 sub-section 18, section 29 sub-section 3, regulations on fishing chapter 9, E241, E295, E24, and case presedent set by Mulligan versus Alfont Paris 2002.
French Government: Please fill in form requisition form W29152, bribe your local mayor, and hold a protest before a decision can be made on whether the glass is half full or empty.
German Government: Is is more efficient to consider the glass to be in a state of flux.
Spanish Government: Who cares?
Welsh Assembly: Maybe we should have a new word for this?
Scottish Parliament: What's the opposite of the English point of view?
Italian Parliament: <couldnt tell what was said, but it was loud and there was lots of arm movements>.
Canadian Government: The glass hasn't told us whether it considers itself half full or empty yet.
Australian Government: The glass only has water in, nobody cares. Now a beer glass on the other hand - that's half empty and needs topping up.
New Zealand Government: We're not Australian dammit!
Occupying Forces of East Timor: We'll let you know our answer when we get on internet.
Nepalese Government: You can have your picture taken with the glass for some coinage. Can we have the big glasses on that TV advert we saw?
Swiss Government: Half of the glass content has been invested.
Norwegian Government: We don't have an opinion, but if we did, you wouldn't listen.
Sicilian Regional Council: The glass is yours, but the content is mine.
British Government: The state of full/empty glass was captured on CCTV.
American Government: Whether it is half full or half empty should be decided democratically, with force used to achieve that end.
United Nations: The glass has the right to declare for itself whether it is half full or half empty.
European Union: See under section 12 sub-section 18, section 29 sub-section 3, regulations on fishing chapter 9, E241, E295, E24, and case presedent set by Mulligan versus Alfont Paris 2002.
French Government: Please fill in form requisition form W29152, bribe your local mayor, and hold a protest before a decision can be made on whether the glass is half full or empty.
German Government: Is is more efficient to consider the glass to be in a state of flux.
Spanish Government: Who cares?
Welsh Assembly: Maybe we should have a new word for this?
Scottish Parliament: What's the opposite of the English point of view?
Italian Parliament: <couldnt tell what was said, but it was loud and there was lots of arm movements>.
Canadian Government: The glass hasn't told us whether it considers itself half full or empty yet.
Australian Government: The glass only has water in, nobody cares. Now a beer glass on the other hand - that's half empty and needs topping up.
New Zealand Government: We're not Australian dammit!
Occupying Forces of East Timor: We'll let you know our answer when we get on internet.
Nepalese Government: You can have your picture taken with the glass for some coinage. Can we have the big glasses on that TV advert we saw?
Swiss Government: Half of the glass content has been invested.
Norwegian Government: We don't have an opinion, but if we did, you wouldn't listen.
Sicilian Regional Council: The glass is yours, but the content is mine.
You have no life OMG. :smash3d:
1
2
Do you use negative over positive?
(42 posts, started )
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG