Quote from Skytrill :

Quote from aroX123 :

Why start a new project like reworking something old like westhill?

You've said it already; it's because Westhill was old. It was said long ago that they wanted to improve it and they did it in a remarkable way. Also, Rockingham has never been released because Scawen wanted the first real-life track to be very close to reality inside LFS and the current tyre physics did not allow such a thing. Yes there is much more than Rockingham in the work. Like the devs said before, S3 will have other tracks and cars and I guess it takes time to prepare all this as well as the other things mentioned long ago like more realistic setups limitation among other things. I'm sure they know more than us that the popularity of LFS diminished to other rivals so there's no need to remind them and it must be one of the reasons why they are hard at work to finally release the S3 as soon as possible.
One of the factor for the delay I believe must be the need to keep the old content updated. When you start a philosophy such as LFS does (increasing the content over years if not decades) then you need to keep the old content fresh again after a while. I have a hard time imaging myself playing LFS3 with the current interior of the RB4. My guess is that several cars if not tracks might get quite an overhaul and that too must be time consuming. That's just speculation though.

When you say none of us got the answer I believe you got it wrong because these questions you mentioned have been answered many times throughout the years. Peace

i agree, You said everything man. guys stop making this topics please , my account dont have much time and i cant see anymore this topics because is boring and dont changed nothing ( just talk for sky and looks really hungry). peace

this is conversation after S3 release. if S3 is good, yes LFS on steam is good thing, before is suicide.

in TC citydriving you have it, you just don't have a gun XD

I agree with you, but in my opinion the priority is tracks mods like assetto corsa for example. making new cars or real life car for lfs is not so easy dude,for some reason we dont have scirocco in LFS. i test 10.000mods by users and every mods changed physics, so is not so realistic to driving. People in LFS use mods because car looks nice , not because driving is realistic to be honest.

lyt is really fun to me, i like technical lyts. some clipping points dont have any sense but nice work dude. i dont know if you are warlab admin or no but to be honest LFS have 100000lyts and admin in Warlab use the same 10 lyts all year.good luck

Quote from MousemanLV :

Tady, that kit you claim to be yours with Aciites S13 lights is not yours, there are way too many bits that are different and both have different quality.

you are wrong dude. yes this is Tady bodykit with parts from other bodykits. Headlights by aciite and grill bumper from Wise Square bodykit by Kamikaze but hey this skin have more parts from others.

is wrong? oh yes, this does not serve to you because you are racer.

Hello everyone. I've been thinking about some improvements that could be made about LFS, I've seen a few similar requests but my idea is something more simple. here goes.

1- new interior for FZ/RB/FXO CARS
2- all LFS rims available for all cars, with specific dds file per rims.
3- option for put different color on rear and front wheels
4- licenseplates.dds (texture) available for all cars
5- maximum lock 90º for all cars
6- total mass distribution (with some restriction if car is FR, FWD,RR etc..) or weight reduction
7- independent bump and rebound for all cars
8- LSD - locking (power / coast) for all cars
9- adding grey/green color for concrete objects and all colors available for all objects
10- new curves(rumble strips) for blackwood
11- remove the conical smoke effect , put smoke effect with one size and also take effect if car make drifting. at the moment if i have hot tyres, car make smoke without any drifting, this idea maybe reduced lag smoke also.

I wait the opinion of the developers on this idea.

Regards

Quote from Rodrigo-Kaiser :

S2 is pretty dead if you ask me. Just check out the cruise servers, full of +20 peeps online with their cars parked for like a week(Except TC, wich I'm lifetime banned from there).

The few drift servers only have 6 cars drifting around, and every 30 minutes it goes empty.

Without mentioning the 'race' servers that stuffs a XFG/XRG/UFR up your *ss until you sucess 40 races or so.


You may like it or not, but it's just my point of view wich I accumulated since years and years of activity on this great sim. LFS doesnt has the same popularity as 2007-2009 era.


PS. I learned to drive IRL thanks to LFS and rFactor, they have all my respect!

a lot of truth in your comment. i see activity in forums with people showing skins and good image rendering, but in game ..... in my opinion is much blab bla bla and people dont play more than 15 or 30 mins. i love LFS anyway.

Quote from Mcc457 :

Part of the reason I went for rFactor1 vs LFS was the amount of content that's currently here is little, it's great, but to me, not worth the money. Maybe they're just not to my taste. I still have fun playing the demo, racing online in pick up races, those are fun to me. I'd hate to see the demo end, or be restricted.

I completely understand and I'm not judging demo players ( guilt is not yours ), But you have not bought LFS because it has a free version, that's the reason why I speak . I'm just stating what I think, because I paid and S2 activity is very weak and unserious. I hope people coming back to LFS with S3 around Rally/Race/Drift, but I think S3 comes too late for these people to return.

You are lucky to have the demo version. the demo version should not be free so long time (years to be exact). in my opinion the demo version should end, for us (holders s2) see if demo people like LFS to buy it and more activity in S2. but I think it will never happen.

thanks Scawen, improvements are amazing. i hope s3 tracks without problems in specific curves. just in diferent places like a old tracks ( because Westhill is too large, we had us some problems with it ). the old Westhill will be integrated again? I miss the old track .Westhill still with good detail and better FPS, continue with their excellent work

Last edited by Abone, Sun, 9 Aug 2015 23:33.

Developers, please block ip address this crack players . it shows the respect he has for LFS... This is not the first video to appear and they can always create a new account. we have to take action.

Quote from cargame.nl :

Of course it's the same.. Because LFS itself doesn't support 2048 yet. If you didn't pay for higher skin quality it sticks @512 anyway.

Unless you already have the 1024 skin(s) locally.

I know. I try say with 1 conversion is the same quality. before with 2 conversions , 2048 to 1024 and 1024 to 512 (in game) quality is the same, because many conversions damage the quality. 2048 is good thing anyway

it only saves time after creating a skin with 2048x2048. I did an upload to 2048, I downloaded the skin trough a replay and the quality is the same (exactly the same as upload to 1024). it would be nice free upload in game 512, 1024 for S1 / S2 and 2048 to pay .we dont need 4096 in my opinion.

impressive improvement, thank you. I have a sound problem in shift mode + u (in H4 and H5), car sound stopped working when the car is not visible on camera, only makes sound capture of visible cars. here's a picture and replay.
sometimes I faced a slight lag screen and sound lag in all situations with good FPS. I tested some new configurations and these are the best for me:
Limit frame rate - 60fps
sleep every frame - no
maximum buffered frames - 0

now i have a higher FPS, but more unstable.I using Limit frame rate at 60fps to play all tracks without having to restart LFS, for configuration for each track to take effect.

sorry my weird english

Last edited by Abone, Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:21.

Account 2011? You do not buy s2 and post a video driving in the crack version? You have to be banned and somehow block your ip (to not create more demo accounts). already enough of people like you around here.

check your box menssage in new drift forum. you have it

give me email to send, do not want to put here because another guy steal your credits.

Quote from tadydrift :

Quote from Abone :

hello. first thanks about your awesome body kits, i really like your work. i want your "Public XRT S14 Pack By TaDy" broken link ...i know you lost it, you dont have any friend with this bodykit?

I am me too trying to find it bro, was one of my best pack :/ still no trace of it anywhere

I have the rims. I send to you, If you want.

Quote from Scawen :

Quote from Abone :

I got considerable improvements with Minimum Sleep option (0 in case), FPS limiter not made much difference to me. Maybe you have a better computer and this makes it difficult to evaluate between your and weaker computer. I think Minimum Sleep should remain, also because many users have a similar system.

Daniel's suggestion is that the minimum sleep option should be removed, and this would be the same as setting it to 0.

So I don't think it is really a performance issue. The question is more like "Does minimum sleep 0 cause problems on some computers?"

I have used 0.6H 4 every day and has been very positive in comparison to 0.6H. "Does minimum sleep 0 cause problems on some computers?" well ... the computer is like a car, if not take care of it, it will stop eventually. some people do computer dustbin, for this reason it is difficult to answer this question. I think no one will have problems, but i dont know.

hello. first thanks about your awesome body kits, i really like your work. i want your "Public XRT S14 Pack By TaDy" broken link ...i know you lost it, you dont have any friend with this bodykit?

Quote from DANIEL-CRO :

I'm trying to think of a valid reason to keep Minimum Sleep option. What I mean is there really isn't any benefit from it, other than maybe reducing produced heat, but that is already possible by limiting FPS which is far better option.

As far as I know most of other games do not have similar option and to my experience that option often confuses people. Some pump it up (logic: more is better) and then cry about low FPS.

I got considerable improvements with Minimum Sleep option (0 in case), FPS limiter not made much difference to me. Maybe you have a better computer and this makes it difficult to evaluate between your and weaker computer. I think Minimum Sleep should remain, also because many users have a similar system.

for me it's more of the same to be honest. Yes, I obtained improvements on all tracks including westhill( thanks for that). in the places mentioned I had improvements to, but in a very short space, that means FPS still drop. I found a light in texture that appears only in clear day.

Quote from cargame.nl :

I guess a lot of people on LFS have some similar performing system.

I agree .. the problem is que these people do not report Their problems, these people do not know this test path available, simply out of laziness .. generally want new things and then criticize when faced with a problem .