You could go back to a system restore point just before the update, or uninstall the update, or use the drivers provided by the manufacturer.
I'd go for the restore point, it's painless, check if it works and then exclude the update from future proposals.
So we must assume that, in your words, the chief designer is not part of a wider team, the racers are not part of a wider team and a test driver that is directly tied to car development is not part of the wider team, and the involvement of all these people having key positions inside the team doesn't mean that the wider team is involved. What more do you need, Ron Dennis' dog being involved? I really don't understand. This sounds like comedic science fiction to me. Anyway, you're free to believe what you want, I'll keep believing that Santa Claus doesn't exist.
The red highlighting in TCPView means that a connection is torn down, so I believe from what you're writing that the connection goes down immediately after having been established.
My LFS opens UDP port 31000 at the start; another UDP port is used when I connect to a server. So, when a connection to a server is operating, I have two UDP ports and a TCP one. When you connect to the master server first the master is contacted, then a lot of short TCP connections to each server that the master has offered as a result of your query are issued: you should see them in green (established) and yellow (changing state). They become red only when the connections are no longer existing. To have a clearer view you can untick "Show unconnected endpoints" under Options in TCPView. This won't, however, show the UDP ports, which are important.
Then try again to reconnect to a server. It should open the TCP port for the server and establish a connection, start downloading skins on a normal http port from Scavier's servers, open an UDP port.
These are the ports used by LFS when I have a stable connection to CTRA Single Seater:
UDP, being a connectionless protocol, doesn't show an endpoint. It's used to send packets when needed, but to know where packets go you need a packet capture software.
The name of the host you see is gathered from reversed dns lookups, and it doesn't differ for me. It should suffice to say it's okay.
My hypothesis, in this case, doesn't vary. Something is shutting down the connection to the server soon after it has been established. Either you have a connectivity problem related to firewall/routing issues or it's a form of traffic shaping, or a provider side problem. Since it happens on a port not devoted to the stuff usually devoted to web surfing or mail I'd ask the ISP, and I would try to compare the result with different online games to see if they are affected. I'd try with something like TrackMania Nations, or something similar and free, working on non http ports.
As I said before, TCPView is rather limited in scope, so an analysis to have better hints has to be done with Wireshark or similar stuff. Unfortunately I cannot ask you to save a short packet capture and send it to me to check if I see something wrong since it could capture also some sensitive data. My first advice would be to check in gaming forums if there's someone else having troubles with your ISP, or call directly your ISP to know if they have implemented some brand new traffic shaping tactic that may interfere with online gaming, or if they have some trouble.
I never liked Hubbard's works. I didn't like his style, I've almost forgot what he wrote and how he wrote it. Probably I'm only interested in science fiction when it trascends the genre boundary to become Literature, and there are only a few names that I'm sympathetic with: Philip K. Dick, Walter J. Miller Jr, Kurt Vonnegut, to name some. And of course, Aldous Huxley. Not even Gibson, who I respect very much but I don't like, although his style is nothing short of excellent.
All these people, regardless of their political/religious positions, had an excellent way of presenting the social context surrounding the facts depicted in their novels. I can't recognise this ability in Hubbard.
Edit: Eurema's Dam by RA Lafferty is one of my favourite short stories ever.
Maybe, probably, perhaps. Interesting words that have no meaning if they cannot be backed by evidence.
Once again, can you prove what you say? No. Voice your doubts if you like, but the real difference here is that what happened to McLaren is based on facts.
When you connect to a server two ports are used, a TCP one and an UDP one. I don't know exactly which of the two is used for guest info traffic. You can start investigating with TCPView by Sysinternals. Download it, use LFS in windowed mode so you can take a look to both windows and try looking at what happens. Does the TCP connection to the server work? Does the UDP connection work?
If you really want to have all the relevant information about network traffic and established TCP connections (UDP is connectionless) you'll need something more serious than TCPView to understand if there is a correct flow of data. Wireshark is a good, freely available packet capture software package.
If nothing has changed in your PC or network setup, I'd guess that this new behaviour could be traced back to the ISP, either for temporary connectivity problem or for freshly implemented traffic shaping/blocking measures.
A well known interview, I'd say. But as long as you can't provide any new evidence I can safely consider this the most serious case of espionage in F1. That's what the proven facts suggest. You can always counter those facts if you want, but a "MAYBE" won't be sufficient.
Since you have all these information about mass scale cheating in F1, wouldn't you please provide them to FIA and WMSC?
If you can't or if you're unwilling to do so, I must assume that the scale of what McLaren did is much more documented or serious than what you're talking about.
I have no rosey glasses on, I understand that cheating is nothing new and that no one, under a thorough investigation, may come clean, but I prefer to rely upon evidence to support a conclusion. If you have something relevant apart from well known facts/rumours that could help improve sportsmanship in F1 please share it with the appropriate persons. You'd do a favour to the whole circus.
Max Mosley, with a letter dated 30th August, granted immunity to the drivers if they cooperated. Someone then decided to save his ass while still possible, with trouble looming ahead.
That's why the emails incriminating McLaren went public, because Alonso gave them to FIA. The authenticity of the mails isn't disputed at the moment.
Does this immunity stuff suck? Of course it does. The whole story stinks, but the stench isn't coming from Ferrari. Those who don't like this idea can always come out with their evidence, as Alonso did...
And, regarding drivers immunity, Ferrari knew about it, maybe they even encouraged Mosley for his letter because it was the only way to gather the needed evidence to achieve the best possible result (in a legal way ). For sure they must have preemptively accepted that the outcome of the judgement wouldn't involve the drivers, although they were part in cause (at least De la Rosa and Alonso). That's why Ferrari is satisfied with the outcome, although they are far more interested in racers championship than in the constructor championship.
Evidence? What kind of evidence? Emails? Short messages from Stepney to Coughlan?
De la Rosa writes to Alonso on 25th March:
"It comes from Nigel Stepney, their former chief mechanic - I don't know what post he holds now. "He's the same person who told us in Australia that Kimi (Raikkonen) was stopping in lap 18. He's very friendly with Mike Coughlan, our chief designer and he told him that."
This mail (along with tons of other communications) shows total awareness of the fact that Ferrari's data was used inside the team to gain an advantage. I really couldn't see harder evidence than that. Coughlan and Stepney lawyers have a huge problem to solve because all of this evidence would stand perfectly in a trial.
Alonso was for sure informed, since the actual content of the emails tells so. The chief designer, a test driver and a driver... Isn't that enough to consider a team involved, or not?
Does Dennis not knowing excuse McLaren in its entirety, or not?
True. For example I believe that all States (or most of the States) are just a bad refinement of Hobbes' Leviathan and I see them as a form of necessary evil that must be controlled thoroughly.
But that's a conclusion, you always have to analyse the facts to your best ability to understand if a single action is abusive or not, and if you can consider that action part of a larger strategy.
Aristotle's thoughts about demagogy and democracy are still valid today, after all. That shouldn't lead to conspiracy theories in all cases, anyway.
Something didn't sound well, in effects. That happens when your mind is prone to remembering 'Feuchtigkeitsempfindlich' instead of simpler (but less funny) stuff.
Ich kann nur ein wenig Deutsch sprechen oder verstanden.
Sounds better?
Anyway my German wouldn't allow me to survive a few days in Germany without resorting to English or gestures, so I didn't list it. And a German forumer a few days ago told me I knew my stuff... Rispettare!
That means "to respect" as a verb, and not "respect" as a noun (which is "rispetto"). This happens when you use an automatic translator or a dictionary that doesn't make any difference between nouns and verbs.
And finally a curiosity: This is the above two paragraphs translated by Babelfish to Italian, and back to English:
In any case my German would not allow that me he survives some days in Germany without to resort to English or the gestures, so as to I have not listed it. And forumer German some days ago sayings me to I have known mine roba... To respect! That one means "to respect" as verbo and "you do not respect" like name (that it is "respect"). That happens when used a translator automatic rifle or a dictionary that not ago some difference between the names and the verbos.
You can do that trick anytime you like. Add Japanese in the translation chain to have a better laugh.
It could be, but it wasn't wasted time for him. I may not like the way he uses it, and dedicated his spare time to his dream, not mine. Who am I to judge the way someone pursues his happiness, as long as his happiness doesn't harm me?
It's an amazing job, and an amazing display of dedication. I just wish I had the same dedication for the stuff that really bothers me. Respect is due.
Liberals, conservatives, communists, socialists, anarchists. We've grown so detached from the real meaning of words that all of these terms have become meaningless insults. George Orwell blamed this deterioration of language as a result of dictatorship. I love Orwell's works, but he was wrong. It was (and it is) lack of faith and of interest in our own abilities, which led (and leads) to delegation of power to people we think are in the know.
I hope you updated your PC and turned on automatic updates (service pack 2 + recommended updates, automatic updates set to advise but not to install, better do that on your own for me). And yes, you could have done everything without a reinstall. My opinion didn't change from the start of this thread, as long as you know what you are doing reinstalls are not necessary.
The 'other' software you're using as firewall could be the key. It may not be doing everything needed, or it may crash. I had, for instance, some problems with old versions of Outpost firewall, which prevented (hanged) big downloads.
Software from Sysinternals help you understand what's going on in your computer: TCPView, Autoruns, Process Explorer, Filemon. These programs are free and not harmful (just don't delete Autoruns key without knowledge).
I did sense a comedic factor. Anyway I find the melody irritating and lyrics far from being witty, so it's just a matter of tastes, I believe. It's just too didascalic for me.
Self-defence expresses itself immediately. If you think death penalty is a form of self-defense that avoids future crimes you open up a legal can of worms while you're declaring the total inability of a state to protect citizens without touching an unalienable right.
Prisons suffice. If they don't, make better prisons, don't twist the logic. For instance no one yet escaped from the new high security prison in Aachen, Germany. It's virtually impossible.