'mise an oevre' (french for application) and read the first post: fill out the info you need and send it to the given email address.
French or whatever nationality, if you wish to excel in an internal league, a better understanding of , and a little bit more effort into, the international language (English) might be helpful.
Including Cargo's signup we now have 43 drivers registered racers for the Fall 2007 season. Still 17 places open for those who want to join (hint, hint)!
Btw do have your buddy sign up too, as part of the grand touring cup is a special squad championship!!
I'm not so sure that little marker is going to make a difference. The way LFS built up its POV is, at least that's the way I see it, it shows you first a scrambled back in which the main color is shown. Only till you get more closer the amount of details increases and you'll get to see a difference. The time between detail view and overtaking may be too short for now (perhaps the improved hp/weight ratio could improve the time of being detailed visible and thus nullifying my point )
Including yesterdays sign ups we now have 41 active racers for the upcomming Grand Touring Cup. As a reminder the first official race will be held this thurday at 9.30PM EST.
This means you still have enough time to prepare, if you're still in doubt of joining this league.
Again, if you are interested in joining this league, visit: www.lfs-lota.net for more info!
Yes, Banshee sure cranks up the average age of a team :P
But age does not has to be a problem, it is all about how serious and mature one is to race. If you can race in a competitive, respectful way, a lot of teams will consider you as a future driver. After all 'older' and experience will come with time
The reasoning is that 4 (/5) races have occurred without this rule. How will you deal with those races, reverse the results? Not only will that lead to a lot of additional work, it wouldn't be fair to those who receive the negative results of those reversed results: those races have been run under the rules as they currently exist, adding a reset rule may be the reason to take a bit more risk and thus hypothetically people could have had a better result if they knew such a rule beforehand.
And forgive me my English, I'm an import American!
The proposed changes have a great repercussion to the league. Due to the severity of these changes take them as improvement points to the next season, and finish this season as it is: after all, all currently participation racers know the rules as they are, and have accepted them as they are.
Same as the other. Although I agree that this is a rule which should have been there. You cannot alter it during the season, not if you taken into account what happend in the previous 4 races. If you reverse the results to cover the whole league, I say yes (but not to the other poll).
Right call, you don't need to adjust your whole race to suit someone else. If enough room is provided at the point where both cars are close to each other, both cars should respect each other and leave room to overtake/ to be overtaken. It is the responsibility of both to ensure a clean takeover, not the guy being overtaken.
Minor changes to the rules are allowed during the season (For instance adjust them so they are clearer), what you definitely not do is alter rules in such a way that it's impact is way too large during the season.
You cannot held 4 races with no reset allowed and then suddenly allow it in the rest of the races.
Everyone knew beforehand: flip = DNF, leave it that way.
If you want realism, you push the car to a position next to the track and don't allow shift+S at all. You can't say 'realism' if you involve shift+s in any state.
What you get now is a useless safety car situation as no damaged car is on the track. In reality the would never send out the safety car if that was the case.
Second note, the additional concrete blocks at the chicane cause unnecessary damage. Although I can understand the additions (till a certain degree) you may want to consider either removing, or replacing the last block on the far left side of the block starting at the right.
Last edited by AppiePils, .
Reason : 2nd adjustment has been altered in a better solution