Pathetic desire? Yet the Americans are the only ones actually having any sort of impact. The rest of the world are too proper for change.
We just want him to build that wall. And your country is going to pay for it.
I like the livery. Simple yet new. Also, that nose is refreshing.
I think we need an update.
Cool looking VOB mod
Nice post, that's cool. I remember trying to teach my dad how to sim-race, but he didn't have the time to learn.
I honestly cannot tell if you are challenged, or illiterate at this point.
Again, I will repeat. IF YOU ARE BORN TO AN AMERICAN PARENT ON FOREIGN SOIL, YOU ARE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. NOT A NATURALIZED CITIZEN. CAN YOU READ?
The 1947 law you are referring to does not state what you think it does.
It states that you can achieve Canadian citizenship (alongside another citizenship) if you are born in Canada, just as Cruz was. It then goes on to state that you only lose this citizenship if you were a NATURALIZED Canadian citizenship (which Cruz was not).
Cruz was a natural born Canadian by means of location, and a natural born American by means of his parents.
He was NOT naturalized in either countries, and you are just further proving you impotence. Give up.
FYI: I think Cruz sucks, but that doesn't excuse you from being blatantly wrong.
Again, I will repeat. IF YOU ARE BORN TO AN AMERICAN PARENT ON FOREIGN SOIL, YOU ARE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. NOT A NATURALIZED CITIZEN. CAN YOU READ?
The 1947 law you are referring to does not state what you think it does.
It states that you can achieve Canadian citizenship (alongside another citizenship) if you are born in Canada, just as Cruz was. It then goes on to state that you only lose this citizenship if you were a NATURALIZED Canadian citizenship (which Cruz was not).
Cruz was a natural born Canadian by means of location, and a natural born American by means of his parents.
He was NOT naturalized in either countries, and you are just further proving you impotence. Give up.
FYI: I think Cruz sucks, but that doesn't excuse you from being blatantly wrong.
2016 MLS Season: Discussion and Fantasy League
Place for discussion for the 2016 Major League Soccer Season. Oh, and if you're a Red Bulls fan you can just leave now.
==============================================
A few of us in the NYCFC Supporters Club, the Third Rail are doing a Fantasy league.
If you are genuinely interested in MLS and plan to play, feel free to signup.
MLS Draft Based Fantasy League
https://app.draftmls.com/league/joining/crpPknAPdgz3PnKbe
Name: ThirdRail
League ID: crpPknAPdgz3PnKbe
Password: nycfc16
Draft: Sat, Mar 5th 2016, 12:00 pm (in a day)
(Noon), 30 seconds per draft. Auto-draft on (proxy lists allowed)
==============================================
A few of us in the NYCFC Supporters Club, the Third Rail are doing a Fantasy league.
If you are genuinely interested in MLS and plan to play, feel free to signup.
MLS Draft Based Fantasy League
https://app.draftmls.com/league/joining/crpPknAPdgz3PnKbe
Name: ThirdRail
League ID: crpPknAPdgz3PnKbe
Password: nycfc16
Draft: Sat, Mar 5th 2016, 12:00 pm (in a day)
(Noon), 30 seconds per draft. Auto-draft on (proxy lists allowed)
Is this an rFactor mod, a different game? I'm confused.
LET ME MAKE THIS CLEAR FOR THE MENTALLY CHALLENGED, CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, AND PEOPLE WHO ARE UNFAMILIAR:
If you're born with US Citizenship (meaning the second you are born you are a U.S. citizen BY LAW) you are a Natural-Born Citizen.
If you are born a citizen of another nation, then move to the US and become a citizen, then you are a naturalized citizen.
Shove your copy and paste BS up the tube.
Oh, and I hope Trump wins the election. Hopefully when they give him the red button and all the launch codes the first country he takes care of is yours. At least we won't have to read this garbage anymore.
If you're born with US Citizenship (meaning the second you are born you are a U.S. citizen BY LAW) you are a Natural-Born Citizen.
If you are born a citizen of another nation, then move to the US and become a citizen, then you are a naturalized citizen.
Shove your copy and paste BS up the tube.
Oh, and I hope Trump wins the election. Hopefully when they give him the red button and all the launch codes the first country he takes care of is yours. At least we won't have to read this garbage anymore.
Last edited by Bmxtwins, .
These aren't my words. I just copy and pasted some bull shit off of the internet, a page from your text book.
it was on different photos from many sources and angles. Maybe it is some sort of sensor. Thought it was odd that it had logos and such on it, if it was temporary.
I asked for your opinion. Not Marco Rubio's
I only see one ever used in LFS and it's none of the above. Probably not for public postings
New Zealand Supports Terrorism
The Independent Review of Intelligence and Security Services is due to deliver its recommendations to the Government on Monday.
The questions Sir Michael Cullen and Dame Patsy Reddy have been tasked with reviewing sit at the heart of the Human Rights Commission's remit so we await the review's findings and the Government's response with immense interest.
READ MORE:
• Inquiry into electronic surveillance agency launched
• David Fisher: Spying - does the nation need to know?
• David Fisher: Just how bad were our spies?
In the frame is whether the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) and the Security Intelligence Service (SIS) are well placed to protect New Zealand's national security needs, while protecting individual rights, and whether the current oversight arrangements are sufficiently robust to ensure they act within the law.
In particular, the reviewers must consider whether the powers conferred by the anti-terrorism legislation brought in on December 12, 2014, as part of the UN-co-ordinated reply to the Isis (Islamic State) threat should be extended beyond their expiry date of April 1, 2017. They include:
* Allowing the SIS to conduct emergency surveillance for up to 24 hours without a warrant
* Allowing the SIS to undertake visual surveillance in a private setting or one that would involve trespass on to private property
* Increasing from one year to three years the period for which passports can be cancelled for reasons of national security
* Empowering the Government to suspend a passport or travel document for up to 10 working days where urgent action is required but there's no time to prepare the paperwork needed for a full cancellation.
Also up for review is the definition of "private communication" in the 2013 GCSB Amendment Act which permits the GCSB to access the content of New Zealanders' private communications for cyber-security purposes (previously the GCSB had no mandate to spy on New Zealand citizens or permanent residents).
We would have liked the information-collecting and surveillance functions of the police to have been included in the inquiry but note that this gap may now be filled as Justice Minister Amy Adams has asked the Law Commission to examine the Search and Surveillance Act 2012, including the impact of modern technology on the ability of the police and other authorities to prevent and investigate crime.
The commission's central recommendation to the Cullen/Reddy Review is that a stand-alone right to privacy be included in the New Zealand Bill of Rights. Beyond that, we have emphasised the importance in system design of clarity, transparency, human rights compliance and limitation of agency powers to the maintenance of public trust and confidence in the role and operations of the intelligence and security framework.
Intelligence gathering has always been and will always be crucial to protecting life, liberty, independence, freedom of belief, human rights and justice. We do not live in a safe world and it would be dangerous to assume we did. But the response must be proportionate.
Maintaining freedom and peace requires us to stand firm on both feet and reassert the values our people have fought and died for in two world wars.
We let the terrorists win if in the interests of supposed self-defence we abandon our rights to privacy and the importance our small, open and democratic society assigns to freedom of speech and freedom of association.
As Lord Hoffman put it in the UK House of Lords in rejecting the Blair Government's argument that internment without trial of non-national terror suspects was a necessary precaution in the post 9/11 environment:
"Terrorist violence, serious as it is, does not threaten our institutions of government or our existence as a civil community ... The real threat to the life of the nation, in the sense of a people living in accordance with its traditional laws and political values, comes not from terrorism but from laws such as these. It is for Parliament to decide whether to give the terrorists such a victory."
New Zealand is now committed to reviewing its surveillance network at least every five to seven years.
This is a positive initiative which will enable us to monitor the complex relationship between national and personal safety and security and individual rights of privacy and of free association and expression.
David Rutherford is Chief Human Rights Commissioner.
- NZ Herald
The questions Sir Michael Cullen and Dame Patsy Reddy have been tasked with reviewing sit at the heart of the Human Rights Commission's remit so we await the review's findings and the Government's response with immense interest.
READ MORE:
• Inquiry into electronic surveillance agency launched
• David Fisher: Spying - does the nation need to know?
• David Fisher: Just how bad were our spies?
In the frame is whether the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) and the Security Intelligence Service (SIS) are well placed to protect New Zealand's national security needs, while protecting individual rights, and whether the current oversight arrangements are sufficiently robust to ensure they act within the law.
In particular, the reviewers must consider whether the powers conferred by the anti-terrorism legislation brought in on December 12, 2014, as part of the UN-co-ordinated reply to the Isis (Islamic State) threat should be extended beyond their expiry date of April 1, 2017. They include:
* Allowing the SIS to conduct emergency surveillance for up to 24 hours without a warrant
* Allowing the SIS to undertake visual surveillance in a private setting or one that would involve trespass on to private property
* Increasing from one year to three years the period for which passports can be cancelled for reasons of national security
* Empowering the Government to suspend a passport or travel document for up to 10 working days where urgent action is required but there's no time to prepare the paperwork needed for a full cancellation.
Also up for review is the definition of "private communication" in the 2013 GCSB Amendment Act which permits the GCSB to access the content of New Zealanders' private communications for cyber-security purposes (previously the GCSB had no mandate to spy on New Zealand citizens or permanent residents).
We would have liked the information-collecting and surveillance functions of the police to have been included in the inquiry but note that this gap may now be filled as Justice Minister Amy Adams has asked the Law Commission to examine the Search and Surveillance Act 2012, including the impact of modern technology on the ability of the police and other authorities to prevent and investigate crime.
The commission's central recommendation to the Cullen/Reddy Review is that a stand-alone right to privacy be included in the New Zealand Bill of Rights. Beyond that, we have emphasised the importance in system design of clarity, transparency, human rights compliance and limitation of agency powers to the maintenance of public trust and confidence in the role and operations of the intelligence and security framework.
Intelligence gathering has always been and will always be crucial to protecting life, liberty, independence, freedom of belief, human rights and justice. We do not live in a safe world and it would be dangerous to assume we did. But the response must be proportionate.
Maintaining freedom and peace requires us to stand firm on both feet and reassert the values our people have fought and died for in two world wars.
We let the terrorists win if in the interests of supposed self-defence we abandon our rights to privacy and the importance our small, open and democratic society assigns to freedom of speech and freedom of association.
As Lord Hoffman put it in the UK House of Lords in rejecting the Blair Government's argument that internment without trial of non-national terror suspects was a necessary precaution in the post 9/11 environment:
"Terrorist violence, serious as it is, does not threaten our institutions of government or our existence as a civil community ... The real threat to the life of the nation, in the sense of a people living in accordance with its traditional laws and political values, comes not from terrorism but from laws such as these. It is for Parliament to decide whether to give the terrorists such a victory."
New Zealand is now committed to reviewing its surveillance network at least every five to seven years.
This is a positive initiative which will enable us to monitor the complex relationship between national and personal safety and security and individual rights of privacy and of free association and expression.
David Rutherford is Chief Human Rights Commissioner.
- NZ Herald
Yeah getting tired of reading racer x's crap. I wander across the thread and then get sucked in lol. I'm sure he's very intelligent, and everything he puts is interesting. But it takes up too much time. And, at the same time most of it is unreliable in terms of sources.
Last edited by Bmxtwins, .
Why does the mclaren have a tumor on its nose?
what's up with the little arms sticking straight up at the front wheel area? The haas doesn't have it but the others do?
I mean it could be better, but I certainly like it. I think they did a good job making use of quite a few over used colors and will definitely stand out.
I mean it could be better, but I certainly like it. I think they did a good job making use of quite a few over used colors and will definitely stand out.
Forum: Allow Users to Ignore Users
Please add an ignore feature.
Do you even read the bull shit you spew? Half of it contradicts itself or is outright ridiculous.
By the way, what is your opinion on the issue of Jerusalem? Granted there's a larger issue than just that, but I want to see if you are even capable of writing and deducing your own arguments. Or if you just copy and paste bull shit.
By the way, what is your opinion on the issue of Jerusalem? Granted there's a larger issue than just that, but I want to see if you are even capable of writing and deducing your own arguments. Or if you just copy and paste bull shit.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG