thank you

i bought DFGT today .. installed logi profiler 5.8 and runs great

cant find..
will buy the DFGT tomorrow...

i used windows xp sp3 - z15 and there the frame rate was around 90 graphics on max
and now with windows 7 i have 40 fps with the same settings but with Z17
sometimes when someone pit it freezes for 5 sec and the frame rate drops down to 2.5 fps

Galaxy (Nvidia) 9500 ddr3
intel D 2.8
2gb ram

Last edited by BOSCHO, Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:56.

Quote from STF :

Another 15 bucks..
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/ ... duct.php?prodid=GC-016-LG

still no Bulgaria for me

i was ordering the DF GT but i saw again the G25 and lol i very missed to have a clutch and amazing gearbox..
for now i collected 180$ and cant find one.. still i need more money but im wondering to get back to the DF GT .. dont now
on topic: the DF GT is amazing wheel - fast, big, strong etc.
but 2 pedals and sec. shifter only that bothers me to get it too

Quote from 5-6-ACE :

http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?t=59072

Not sure if the offer still works but even if it doesnt its 129.99 with free shipping..

they do not have Bulgaria in the sign up account thing

Quote from AlienT. :

http://www.novatech.co.uk

Deliver to Europe, price is £124.99 though. Give it a few weeks and those side-grading to a G27 may sell their G25's cheap.

the same here.. no Bulgaria

Last edited by BOSCHO, Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:16.

i will wait for something or someone to show up

In Bulgaria are only brand new on their old prices

Availability: Temporarily Out of Stock

mini bug

Please if anyone can sell me a G25 Wheel second hand or new
the price needs to be £100 or less than £100
I want to buy one but in my country the price is ... very high for me
the only thing i want is .. to work fine
I am from Bulgaria
PM me if you got any offers
tnx

Quote from Maelstrom :

I haven't read all the posts but will the rally stage be included?

in the future.. we hope
nobody knows actually

no smoke with me too

great update

ya the lfs community is the biggest of all other sim comm..
and the game is the best simulator on the best pricing
(my grandma can drive on nfs with police after it with my old dfp but in lfs she can't get out of the pits )

Quote from AndroidXP :

You can see the diff quite clearly without zooming in and both JPEGs are larger than the PNG. Since this screenshot has lots of large uniform spaces the PNG's compression can work better here.

ya the color of the jpg's is more... uncolored

Quote from Shadowww :

Same quality? Post teh jpg here.

if you zoom it you can see the diff but in original size they are the same

no big diff same quality..
ps: too much offtopic

is licensed by me
thread/

Quote from Shadowww :

Wrong. Would you screenshoot some application to PNG? That's just dumb.

for image editing only like my avatar i made it with transparent background

png is for transparent backgrounds and jpg for the rest

Quote from ColeusRattus :

That's actually a nice idea.
Now I don't know how complex such a system would be, but if we think it further, it would even be possible to do specific content licences, like "Road Cars", "Single Seaters", "GT", or even single car purchases.

With micropayments being the trend today, I guess it could generate income if people could only buy and pay for the content they want...

or buy "S3" and after that every car or track released to be little amount of money but for example if you have the car or track and other 5 people have them it wont be fun to race with only 5 people.. so i guess its a nice idea to buy the "S3" pack with all cars and tracks and free updates

Quote from jasonmatthews :

i find these posts regarding the price of lfs frankly ridiculous. Any other game that you try to buy on the shelves today will cost around £44.

The fact that scawen (wrongly imo), has branded lfs an alpha product and decided not to distribute lfs in the high street has compounded the issue. His latest post seems to agree that the alpha tag is no longer applicable.

From my personal point of view, i have never in my whole life experienced anything that even comes close to lfs in terms of value. £24 for 5 years of constant entertainment. I spend double that every month on sky tv, which thanks to lfs, i never get to watch :d

asking another £12, or whatever they ask, from users who have been playing the game since 2002 is absolutely nothing. We have all seen the alternative with iracing, which thank god they have not decided to do. If, god forbid, then went down that route, i would have spent £100's in the last few years. Also, if lfs did go the subscription route, i would leave instantly. But what i would happily pay extra for is exactly what the community has been asking for, real tracks, with laser scanned quality (and hopefully bumps), and more content.

May i talk hypothetically for a minute..

Scawen wants to charge £24 for s3, on top of s2. So, lfs s3, for a new user, costs £46 (normal retail price for a game these days). For us it is £24.

For this money, they will spend the money on marketing and distributing lfs in shops, putting in 10 real tracks, putting in 5 more cars in, surround sound, dx9/10 quality graphics, better physics, sanctioned races/servers.

So, if they did this, they could afford to hire some graphics guru's, get some tracks laser scanned, and increase the user base. With some sanctioned servers/leagues/comps aswell lfs could easily (imo) take over iracing. Iracing get's away with charging >£10 per month, plus content cost, for a product that is vastly inferior to what lfs "could" be, with a modest amount of investment.

Hypothetical over

lfs already has a huge physics update coming, a new car and the prospect of s3 on the horizon. This is not before time imho, but it will be free.

When s3 does come out, i hope it will be a big change, but i do fear that it won't. I hope to god that s3 doesn't cater for the pentium 3/4's that lfs caters for atm. It will be 2010/2011, and to expect the majority (probs 90+%) of the userbase to have to put up with shite dx8 graphics and 2 channel sound to please the tiny minority, in spite of the huge progress computers have made in the last 10 years since lfs was first released, would be a massive shame

/rant over

1+

OffTopic
Lol messed up
i mean the image size is bigger but the quality the same and when i take a screen with ctrl+s is about 3.xx bytes and when i take it with prtscr is about 1.xx (2mb difference) bytes and its a lot of work when i take more than 1 screen and need to compress it to upload it in websites that the most have 2mb allowed image space.The image in the attachment is 1.85 mb with prtscr and with control+s is 3.75 that i CANT upload it here (needs compress)