Quote from Jakg :

His or mine?

I have an Intel Xeon X3210, which is a (now cancelled) Intel Q6420 with the "prefetchers" optimised for server use (which makes about a 3% performance hit in games). It's 2.13 GHz at stock.

His CPU is an E2180.

.....what CPU did you use @2.8 to get 16 seconds.

I believe you more than Harjun, obviously, so if you used and e2180 at 2.8 to get that time then ok, but if you used a different CPU then it doesn't really mean anything in comparisons to Harjun, does it, i.e. Harjun is still bullshitting.

Last edited by garph, Fri 11 Apr 2008, 17:49.

What CPU was it?

Quote from harjun :

but my e2180 gets the same as that at 3.2Ghz lol and i've got 2gb or RAM

Quote from andybarsblade :

This that 16secs that you dont have a screen shot of?
that shows 20 secs at 3ghz
http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?t=36415&page=6

Harjun, google: e2180 3.2 superpi, then look at all the people who have set their e2180 at 3.2ghz and then come back and tell everyone here that you can get yours to do it in 16 seconds.....when everyone else with one gets around 19 seconds.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and lets just say you miss read the results when you did it, but please, just stop going on about it.

Last edited by garph, Fri 11 Apr 2008, 17:35. Reason : typo

What you searching for? The 07 versions, no different to the 08 exepct for the number which i'm sure you can edit yourself.

http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?p=333559#post333559
http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?p=327513#post327513

The more TV that becomes availabe free on the tinternet the more the ISP's will have to deal with much higher bandwidth usage by the average person.

All those on bandwidth limited connections, who DON'T monitor it will get a massive surprise (an email and threats from their ISP saying they've gone over their limit) when they start to use things like the BBC iplayer and such like.

It's going to need a total rethink by the ISP's on how they sell their products, thier prices and bandwidth limits.

Hopefully it will mean the same prices but bigger bandwidth limits as they fight with each

Decided to do the F1 Renault 08 as well, again not gone with any Renault logos.

Thought I have a go at the Renault skin after doing the Toyota skin.

I've not added any Renault logos, as before, because of the BMW badge (think it would look odd) but it should say RENAULT on the rear wing and it looks a bit blank with nothing, tried a Bridgestone logo but it didn't go and don't want more ING or ELF logos.....any ideas?

EDIT: Sorted it out now - http://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?p=765418#post765418

Mods: you can deleted this thread if you want.

Last edited by garph, Thu 10 Apr 2008, 13:13.

FBM - Toyota F1 2008

Dunno if it's been done, I had a look but couldn't see it. Not added any Toyota logos because with the forced BMW badge it just didn't go.

I think a lot of people didn't give Alonso the benefit of the doubt because of his behaviour last year and the levels he seemed to be prepared to drop to.

And as for all those Hamilton haters, same old same old. I don't think he can do anything right and at times he does and says everything wrong and is the only one to ever do so.

I don’t know what it is about certain people, Casey Stoner attracts the same kind of criticism.

Quote from NSX_FReeDoM :

does any1 have a video of the hamilton-alonso crash with the telemetry of Alonso's car?

Yeah, Renault, no one else will have that yet.

There has been a few posts where people are asking for things or think something should be like this but have no real idea of the reality.

The clutch smoke is a classic example, no idea of what really happens but have an idea of what they think it should be like.

Plenty of time driving the car and tweaking the setups can normally sort out the worst of what people think is a lack of grip as well as being much more progressive on the throttle, not just stamping on it.

I had a 7600GS back before I upgraded then upgraded again. It ran LFS really well, enough AA to smooth things out.

You're not going to get great FPS with larger grids, it might be an issue at times, but you should be able to make LFS look pretty and playable.

Never used it before.....

http://www.google.co.uk/search ... t=broad-revision&cd=1

Nice, with a bit of luck I'll get a chance to try out Vista 64bit with my hardware/software before I buy it.

Any other essential Vista tweaks?

Jesus, I even have muppets PMing me to tell me that "oh my PC gets more than that....blah, blah..."

The point is you wont get a solid 100FPS from whatever this guy calls a cheap PC, it WILL drop much lower than and even top of the range PC's drop below that.

Quote from Tomba(FIN) :

Well now you are thinking that this isn't graphic game and everyones computer can't run the game after that, so buy new computer! Nowadays even cheap computers can run lfs like 100fps graphics full.

No they can't, all the people saying they get that kind of constant FPS are just lying, even top of the range computers will drop as low as 20, 30 or 40FPS at the start and under heavy load.

Quote from Tomba(FIN) :

So, don't play?

...and what the hell is wrong with you telling people to just buy a new computer or sayin just stop playin if they can't afford S2 let alone an upgrade.

Can't wait to see the reaction you get from now on when you post and how many server ban lists you've just been added to. Way to make friends and influence people dumbass.

I've been in a car when the clutch died, it did not smoke, it made a bad smell.

Quote from vane :

and what would stop them from being able to modify it? they have managed to make lfs good so far...

Nothing but time and a long list of things to do, all of which are more important than adding things to turn LFS from a racing simulator into GTA-LFS.

Quote from Tomba(FIN) :

Enough of these god damn s3 threads!!! :hbomb::hbomb::hbomb::hbomb:
Someone make this end!

It's actually a recognised medical condition; Retard-o-isum-ness-itus.

It spreads through internet forums via seeing a particular thread about something, lets say S3, which would awaken the dormant Retard-o-isum-ness-itus gene and the poor sufferer would have a complete break down of common sense and completely loose their ability to read words such as, search or read other threads about the topic that set of the Retard-o-isum-ness-itus and would result in an uncontrollable urge to post a thread about the same or similar subject.

Quote from T.J. :

No need for Vista 64bit if you are not using 4Gb ram.

....I am running 4Gb of RAM!

Intel E6750
Gigabyte PC35-DS3R
4Gb PC6400
Nvdia 7950GX2

I'm going to buy Vista but I thinking of getting the 64bit version. I was just wondering about any compatibility issues anyone has had with it and if you think it's wise to even go with the 64bit version at all?

Any advice is appreciated!

Better in the MOVIES section maybe?

http://www.lfsforum.net/forumdisplay.php?f=21

This is a joke, LFS is a racing sim, not GTA or Second Life.......cruising is the worst thing to come into LFS, it will be the death of it.

Quote from shiny_red_cobra :

Just a general question here, but you can still install 4GB of memory in a 32-bit system, can't you? I mean, it won't all be recognized by Windows, but won't all 4GB physically be in dual-channel mode?

Yes you can install 4gb and yes I does run in dual mode, according to my bios, bootup screen and CPUID it does anyway.

XP it's self says I have 3.25gb.

Alonso and Raikkonen in the same team considering how Alonso was when he wasn't given out and out number 1 status within Mclaren, I don't see it happening.