Until you go in game and Forza looks much worse than it does in screenshots. (Hah)
Also I'll be buggered if Forza has that much attention to detail on any of it's cars.
Expect a PM in half an hour.
I would have given you a vote but you never bought me those shoes I wanted when you got drunk. I am disappoint.
How can anyone come before earmelon? Has that legend turned to myth?
I doubt it too if I'm honest, but I would love to see him make a return.
Why is that +1? It might be true, but it's completely missing the link between him and Brawn which if anything would be even more significant.
I think Schumey's connections with Brawn are what's important in this case. Not his links with Ferrari.
Schumacher to Mercedes?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/h ... t/formula_one/8368107.stm
Not sure what to think about this myself.
Discuss...
Not sure what to think about this myself.
Discuss...
Oh so now GT5 was released in 2004 rofl. Assuming you meant GT4, it was released in 2005, not in 2004. If you got it in 2004 then you managed to somehow purchase it before it was even publicly released.
I don't think you understand the fact that they have completely re-built the game engine from scratch and that no racing game out will be as content-rich as GT5 when it is released. You're a bit of a tool if you think that it can all be done in a year or 2 without it being a piece of crap.
Why have you still got it in your head that GT5 was delayed? Like I already pointed out clearly on the RSR forums, GT5 has not been delayed once. They never announced a release date until recently, for March 2010. How can there be a delay if it doesn't have a release date. You're talking out of your rear.
Well there's no real need to flame PD for taking their time with the game to make it the best they can, just because you're impatient. Incase you had somehow missed it, I play LFS too. That doesn't mean I should just assume GT5 is vaporware. I will enjoy playing each of them equally when GT5 is released. If you can't be patient then it's your loss!
I was gonna link that earlier myself!
Awesome vid.Car rollover has been confirmed by the way.
Why would I be hoping for a release date this side of 2010? The projected release date is March '10. If Bunder has a point then it's an extremely poor one, basing his thoughts on the game from trailers and snippets of gameplay of a 65% complete game. I wouldn't expect amazing damage, just something that works well with mechanical damage which will make people try to avoid crashing into things/each other. From the small amounts of gameplay I have seen, which give away very little anyway, I have seen mechanical damage which hinders performance. Also, Bunder seems to pull facts out of his arse that are untrue. GT5 is NOT 6 years in the making. Where did you get 6 from? GT4 was released in 2005. In that time PD have released a handheld version of the game, and then next year they plan to release GT5, FIVE years after the prequel. Since this game was re-built from scratch, I would expect it to take this amount of time. The first GT took 5 years to develop.
Since when did you get your hands on the finished game? Unless you didn't and are just talking out of your backside.
Are you sure? It was one of the top results on google images when I searched for Lithuanian girl.
Along with:
and
Are you sure?
I googled Lithuanian girl.
Well if you're into that kind of thing
LOL at the "you're wrong fingers" where the guy just walks off the pitch and out of view. Ronaldo IV ... Spot on Ahahaa!
Ronaldo IV ... Spot on Ahahaa!HAHAHA
http://www.amazon.com/JL421-Ba ... ref=tag_tdp_ptcn_edpp_url ROFL ... check the prices aswell for the "new" and "used" product!
Haha I just noticed a peculiar tag associated with this product! Oh wow and the reviews are just gold!
Nothing more to add than what Dan has already said. Thanks guys, never forgotten. RIP
I was actually referring to the part where you said boxers do not use their legs. Also, it depends which fight you look at. I find boxing more interesting to watch because their is more strategy to it than running around slapping each other and kicking each other in the shins. The speed and verocity of boxing matches varies greatly, so giving links to both types of fighting means very little since you chose the links and you're obviously not going to pick an exciting boxing match to prove your point.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACzHS92YPCM - This is more exciting that a guy ramming his toe in someone's eye in my opinion. Seeing the size combined with the speed of the two fighters is amazing to watch.
It's all down to preference, I was just saying that it is untrue to say that boxers do not use their legs, when footwork is key. The Haye vs Valuev is a prime example. Haye danced rings around Valuev and it was great to watch, even with Valuev's longer reach, he couldn't touch him. This was all down to strategy and Haye stuck to it for the whole 12 rounds, which takes a lot of skill and concentration.
There was hardly any hugging in last nights fight actually. Haye fought a good game. I was impressed with the way he played it smart even when he is used to being the hard hitter. He looked good and danced around the ring, whereas Valuev was just edging himself forwards for the whole fight. I noticed that Valuev was in the centre of the ring for pretty much the whole fight while Haye just danced rings around him, catching him here and there with the odd jab which racked up the points. I do not normally watch boxing, or find it that interesting, but I enjoyed watching this fight because I could see the strategy to it, rather than just the all out knock seven shades of shit out of each other that I normally see.
You declare that boxing has had its day but is now boring as if that is fact. It's only your opinion, a lot of people will disagree with it. You shouldn't get so upset about it just because other people enjoy different things.
You're right!
Last edited by Gills4life, .
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG