Quote from Luke.S :

yes because I reported it.

TBH you are getting so annoying. Every thread about a game

"I'll have to pirate it."

Quote from tristancliffe :

It's not your choice on the official forum.

These two are right , you fail jordan...


Ontopic:

I believe lfs is doing it a better way,
i like it more that you only have to pay for unlocks, not for the service it self

indeed

very very nice and sexy car.

i bet it will even be a more compatible car

Quote from AcesHigh :

FXO: Fast but hard to drive and eats front tires
RB4: Slow and heavy but easy to drive and has more options to tweak.
XRT: is like FXO but i feel somewhat easier to control, its like between FXO and RB4.

This means that the RB4 could verywell be successful in an endurance race where tirewear and stability matters alot. Ofcourse the FXO can maintain its tires and still be fast in a race, just it depends alot more on the driver.

Im not Sure or you are correct here..
Me personal is not a good xrt driver, and if you ask
me the fxo is much better on the Tyres then the xrt, if ask me on the end of the day it all comes down on the setup again! With the fxo you can have heating setups and balanced setups. Same as for the xrt.

The only problem why people are getting hot tyres in the fxo is when the are creating understeer, This is where the tempertures is coming from ( like most of you know ). I'm having a lot good fxo that you can drive for laps after laps without any problem.

The only thing that Im trying to say In this post, that I think that the cars (fxo 3%) are very good ballanced, I believe that the car that's driven the most is the quickest car, mainly because of the setups.

Like you can see in the previus posts in this threat, the rb4 is not bad it's only underused compared to the other two.

Saying this the stats that are posted above are not 100% accurated becuar if you look at the amound of uploads / wr records you will find that the fxo and xrt have got way more....

Hope you see what I mean

Last edited by hotmail, Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:48.

Quote from niels1 :

Yes I bought one. But I didnt needed a gaming laptop.
I needed a laptop were battery duration was the key.
I use it for work to order parts and seeing exploded views.
So mine was around 600 euro`s but suites me perfectly.

I would say the Asus looks bloody nice.
A fine piece of machinerie.

Ah okey , yeah think so too :P

Quote from franky500 :

just chucked up another mirror, should make it ease up for you shadowww.

http://www.500servers.com/download/nkpro_beta3.rar
http://www.500control.co.uk/nkpro_beta3.rar

thanks franky , much better then 200kb/sec

@niels1, have you allready got the laptop where stable is talking about :P?
ifso what type ?

First of all thanks everybody with the comments!

am i correct saying that when we are talking laptops, that the GPU is more limiting the gaming then the CPU ?

If so then the ASUS (with gts360m) looks like the best deal or not ?

I am looking for a laptop and i have been looking around the past 2 weeks, but i still have got some questions where im not 100% sure about.

First of all my budget is around the 1000 euro, maybe 1100 hopefully 900 euro

Why do i need a new laptop:
my battery only last 10 min
i can't play dirt 2 and games like that.

What do i have now for laptop:
http://tweakers.net/pricewatch ... o-vgn-fz31m.html#tab:info

The New Laptop Must Have:

And Hopefully my new Laptop will have:

as you can see my wish list is pretty easy but, the problem that i am facing is the new Core i5 , Core i7. What is good and what is bad.

Basically i have found some laptops that looks allright, but because i am not having a 1700 euro butget i can not get the best of the best. so i will need to make some chooses. do i need a Core i5 with good GPU or a Core i7 with a not that good GPU ?

some examples ( if you find more , feel free)
ASUS N71JQ-TY002X (i7 ,but a Radeon Mobility HD5730)
http://tweakers.net/pricewatch ... 71jq-ty002x.html#tab:info

ASUS G60JX-JX032V( Core i5 430M, GTX 360M)
http://tweakers.net/pricewatch ... 60jx-jx032v.html#tab:info

SONY VPC-F11M1E/H (Core i5 520M , GT 330M)
http://tweakers.net/pricewatch ... pc-f11m1e-h.html#tab:info

Anybody can help me with this problem, or just got some more information ?

Quote from Bob Smith :

Large text doesn't help get your point across. It just makes you look like an idiot.

Well, maybe you can try too not make somebody an idiot.

maybe you can just agree with me that after that post what i just deleted because you dont like it!!!

Nobody made a serius post about the poll again. it can just be accidence but know one is sure....


and btw , why are you THAT pissed on me, I can understand that you dont like the stupid post that are going around, but how hard is it to check my profile (when you dont know me, what i dont believe) and check how many posts i have made the last weeks?

you will find out that, that i have read everything but i havent posted anything. you would find and conclude from the post i made, that people shouldnt make posts like that. you will find that there was no reason to call me an idiot. just becuase i tried something else?

have a nice day.

empty

empty,

sorry , i made bob upsaid oh dear

Last edited by hotmail, Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:46.

Quote from z-ro 8 :

Try joining AS6 in UFR then type !remove

got it working,

Thats wanst the fix btw

Quote from z-ro 8 :

it should.

i think i read that you may have to be in the car in which you choose to remove stats from, but not sure. may want to check manual.

well i have read the manual and in the car or spectate doesnt change anything.....

Quote from z-ro 8 :

by default this is only available to Limad level 5, so if you're not logged in with server PW, or do not have Limad5 permission, you cannot use this command....

you can change the Limad level in .cfg file , look for EnableStats= command, or change your Limad rights to 5.

so when i am logged in with the admin pass it will not work?

HEy EQ,

I am having some problem with the !remove Command.
I got the same problem in v2.3.4a and v2.3.2,

The problem: When i type !remove UFR AS6 or !remove * * or !rem * * or !remove , nothing happens

hope you can help me

many thanks,

Reint Jan

Made an Update for the system , its now only show this times from the people that are signed up for the Pre-Season Race

http://conceptracing.net/itcc

Quote from Dygear :

BF1

• Drive:
  • Rear Wheel Drive (RWD)
    
• Engine:
  • 2.4 litre V8
    
• Power:
  • 538 kW (722 bhp) @ 19076 rpm
    
• Torque:
  • 288 Nm (213 lbft) @ 16315 rpm
    
• Total Mass:
  • 530 kg (1323 lbs)
    
• Power-weight:
  • 1015 W/kg (1383 bhp/ton)
    
• Weight dist:
  • 46.3 F 53.7 R
    

How is the Power to Weight found? In both W/kg and bhp/ton. With the information given here ...

Lol just wanted too say , bean0 is the one you are looking for

but he was too again

Name : Reint Jan Hoiting
LFS Username : hotmail
Preferred number (02-99): 64

LFS Screen name: 64 R.Hoiting

Quote from GreyBull [CHA] :

Not your fault, no worries, I would have never thought of reporting you for that Well, cmon, this is racing after all, incidents like that may happen, especially at 2/3 distance when everyone know that there's not so much opportunities to pass left in the race. I'm rather surprised to see that the admins would like to investigate this incident by themselves, after all, we're all mature guys and know how to raise a report when there's an actual issue with someone.

Anyway, I agree on the fact that #0 had a rather weird behaviour during the race, but well, everyone can have a bad day I guess

First off all Thanks for forgiving me.
And i fully 100% agree with you post.

Also supriced about the fact that the admins broth it up

Cant Wait for the next race. Hope too See you on the track :P:eclipsee_

Quote from hyntty :

Incident between cars 33, 32,86,18 and 0
timecode 38:35 onwards
Will be investigated after the race.

I would say from 34:00 min onwards, i know that i wasn't as carefull that i am normally , but if you ask me, I wasn't crashing or anything. What happened at 38:35 : I allready tried too make a move for 5 times on the 0 guy, every move i passed him but he broke everytime WELL over the limit. ( for example in t1 i had to watch my mirror otherwise he would have been crashing me ).

Knowing that we would crash me out when i was going to out brake him, i needed to overtake him at the Fast- High speed corners. I tried this for 2 times, every time he closed the door. the 3th time i couldnt brake anymore and we just had contact. because he never saw me.....

What happend at 39:20. ( THE CRASH)

NR 0 got the brakes and the corner in a very strange way. the made car nr 33 crash him, I hoped that i could pass nr 33 on the inside , but i only just hit him, if you ask me , Nothing i could do about that. ( Car nr 18 crashed out because of the slow car 33!


Basicly it wasnt my best racing day, and i am sorry about that. but i do not think that i did anything that reportable or even what's worth a penalty.

I also Would like too join :P,

but it looks like there are some database errors

Quote from ORION :

So basically, S3 would add a new gfx engine + weather system, and allow users to add new content.

Just brainstorming a bit

You are allready around for a long time in Lfs.
(no negative feeling please, Please don't understand me wrong)

So i though that you would know that in lfs:
1+1 is not 2
1+1 = an other variable

In other words, you would say you are correct, but i am afraid you are in-correct when you are taking this theory in to LFS.

Thanks for the Report ):P

Good Stuff

Quote from Scawen :

But I really need to make it clear the physics has quite a way to go. Just in case that's what you were thinking.

So no plans on a Xmas patch this year?

( I am only asking this because there are many people with the feeling or maybe hope for an Xmas patch)