I would say after 10 years the moderators had enough, even when I started all those years ago you were tht idiot on the forums that everyone would just ignore as he made more dire attempts for attention.
As for NIKI you and him are like peas in a pod and anyone who had ever raced in OLFSL will admit you idolise him so you're basically the definition of bias. Most people don't mind you anyway but I'm guessing your old age paranoia has gotten the better of you and from experience you have always been a very difficult person to interact with.
Anyways you've done no favours to yourself coming on here and showing everyone why you were banned and why that ban was justified.
Doesnt matter what the max figure is its the spacing inbetween, for example, lets say a win is 50. For the championship to be more open then roughly 44 - 42 for 2nd, then 38 for 3rd, 36 for 4th and then 1 point lower per position. This allows you to win and the title leaders to finish 3rd lets say and have a 12 point swing.
No No, I agree with it and I have read it all. There is two ways of fixing the drop out race, having drop scores which will allow lower teams to improve throughout the season and drop scores at the end which will allow them to be further up the table. Or like you suggested, have a larger gap between the points so catching up a deficit is actually possible.
If fact it's quite the opposite, last season we had a single bad round and ended up 20 points (20 positions) behind the league, that was a massive deterrent. It's the same this season, one bad round, no hope of winning with the points so close to increased chance of dropping out. You understand?
The drop round allows lower teams to drop worst results early on the year as they improve during the season. I do agree that 1 point per place is a little silly and the top 5 should be rewards for their position by maybe a 2-4 point spacing between the places.