I just imported it into Virtual dub, used a sharpening filter, cropped all the undesirable stuff out of the image while maintaining the same aspect ratio, and then re-sized to 320x240 and exported to a gif.
After using ubuntu for a while, I decided to move back to windows. I have a 500GB hard drive with an NTFS partition. I've always used the 500GB drive to store files and my 250GB for installing OSs to. Anyway, the 500GB drive is only 5GB large and has 0bytes free space according to windows. But in reality it has like 100GB free space or so. Has anyone encountered this problem?
By "it would still tilt to the side" do you mean "it would still roll?" I think the answer would be no, because the forces are acting upon the center of gravity, and the roll center is the point that the center of gravity rotates around. If the two points are equal, then there shouldn't be any body roll, or that's how it would seem to me.
I think that's why many people will install springs that are shorter, because it lowers the center of gravity thus shortening the distance between it and the roll center. Since torque is force x radius, and the force is the same, but the radius is decreased, then the torque acting upon the center of gravity is decreased.
So, stiffening the rear springs would reduce roll in the rear, but also affect the longitudinal load transfer (possibly adversely)? Where does the longitudinal load transfer come into handling, anyway? There's alot of talk about lateral load transfer in general, but not much discussion with respect to longitudinal load transfer.
Is an anti roll bar really necessary to make a car handle well? On a car without a rear anti roll bar, wouldn't increasing the (bump?) damping of the rear suspension have the same effect as having a rear anti roll bar?
A friend of mine got a reckless driving ticket for pulling someone on roller blades using his moped. That's how strict cops are where I live. Up to $2500 fine and up to 12 months in jail if you drive recklessly. Also, supposedly you get a day in jail for each MPH over 80mph. So if you're pulled over doing 100mph, you're going to be in jail for 20 days.
Unless you're counter-steering too much while it snaps, or don't turn the wheel straight fast enough when it gets traction, then you just start spinning in the opposite direction, right?
I definitely agree about traction loss being too gradual in LFS with respect to what I have experienced in real life. Not too long ago I crashed my car going a bit too fast into a corner. My shock absorbers probably need to be replaced, who knows if that contributed. Anyway, a small bump in a corner caused me to lose traction. But I didn't understeer, the back end of my car just decided to come out. I stupidly slammed the brakes, and then what I ended up doing is over-correcting and spinning the other direction. Then the front end of my car hit the guardrail and the back end of my car swung around and hit the guardrail. It doesn't seem possible to get LFS to act this way in it's current state, though there's no corners like the one I crashed on in LFS.