Thanks, Scawen.

Me too.

Quote from dekojester :

... It's a shame the community is as weak as it is, as the possibilities for great on-track action are still there, if only the people would do so.

The competitive part of the community has definitely done their part to keep both LFS and NDR afloat. Calling the community weak because people eventually had enough of driving the same combinations forever? That's an outright insult.

Sweet, hope they turn out good.

That's true. I'm still impressed by the Ricoh, awesome little camera.

P.S. I was 'm' yesterday.

Impressive work, Ben. Especially considering they're SOOC.

what is this

Quote from dawesdust_12 :

It's an important addition to the engine. DX10 added it as a library feature, so I think it's nice that LFS' engine has that functionality added to it as well in DX9, plus it allows for more intricate repeated geometry instead of alpha textures.

As long as it slows down the release of any future content, everything is well and good.

Quote from Chriship :

Nice avatar fits you well

why

i make bigture and win podium 2th place

am i soldier ?????

thanks

i join

why

best

yawn

best skins

welcome

hoo kers

Quote from Jesse Kyytinen :

One thing I really would like to see is totally empty tracks, specially South City.

u wot?

Good team

Quote from THE WIZARD DK :

DO you seriously discard the fact.. that not everybody is whining for the newest latest shit on the markets..

Quote from Scawen :

I don't get this thing about high res textures. Yes, if you get out in SHIFT+U mode and look down at the floor from 20 cm away, or right up close to study the bricks on the side of a building, sure. But how is that related to driving? Anyway, Eric has used a lot of high res textures on Westhill so a lot of people will be happy about that. But for me it just means it's slower to load and the frame rate is reduced. Go to half texture res and the frame rate is increased without any change in visual quality that I can see. I really don't get what it's all about. But apparently loads of people just love high res textures. Seriously, do you spend that much time so close to textures that you need it? It seems to me that what the images are lacking is things that I just haven't coded yet, specular lighting on the road (and many other surfaces... really most things have some kind of specular reflection) other lighting effects and so on. Things that would have a much greater visual effect and simply cannot be solved with increased texture resolution. I have wondered about adding separate texture resolution settings per track so for example you could leave your car interior resolution up as normal but for Westhill select half texture resolution if you don't have the latest graphics card.

I guess this is the reason why the RB4 cockpit only consists of three pixels.