I tried to read the most of his 2083 Declaration because I was really curious at what moment he went wrong.
There are 2 things striking:
First analysis chapters are really good and precise analytics of cultural marxism and EU. I am really impressed. Not so many exaggerations or fails, too much stress on cultural than simply economic factors (which then create cultural factors). Nearly all of analysis are on the spot, so in the analysis - he's got the point.
Apart from great exaggerations on islamophopia and immigration (there is a fault of assuming latest UK immigration is islamic as it is economic from Eastern Europe). I am not an islamophobic even thou when I see places like this:
where act of barbarian demolition of buddhist sculptures (and as I now found out in this paper - probably act of great massacre of millions of Hindus in HinduKush) is to be something to be proud of... This is where multiculturalism fails - not all values are equal as being proud of slaughter and damage is not a value in western society.
What is shocking is the difference of level of analysis and the proposed vulgar and naive reactions: blackmail with civil warfare for change of cultural flow of multikulti. Reactions of someone who discovered for himself a huuuuge problem and tries to create sudden complete solution, while solution can also be in culture way only.
So - the analysis: great
Answers: wrong.