Hi guys, could anybody post a shot from LFS with 90FOV and in 1920x1080 resolution?

Guys, think something like this:

You are one of developers, you usually post updates, but after some time there happens to be more and more whinning on the forum. You post a new update, and there is again whinning that something is wrong. After few months You discover that there is a lot of hostility on the forum. In the beginning of LFS there was quiet friendly atmosphere(yeah... i was a member from 2004, but i've finnaly bought LFS in 2007... credit card problems ), so it was pleasure for devs to post(especially non-lfs threads which were nice to read). Some of You(as devs) might be simply afraid to post things like "sry, can't make it, it will be delayed", because lot's and lot's of people will accuse You of being irracional/lazy or simply that You don't care about customers.

Now think that there wouldn't be such a hostility on this forum. Friendly atmosphere, and no insluting towards the devs. Surely they would post more frequently and it would be more pleasent to post here. Scawen said himself that such threads DO NOT speed up the development and only make this forum less pleasant place to visit! So what is the point of all that whinning? You are doing absolutly nothing to speed up the development, just making this forum a more hostile place. What if the only way to get more update reports, is to be more friendly and (somebody would say that surely) kiss their a**, just be a typical fanboy? Hell no? Well... if You will say so, consider the fact that by whinning You GAIN NOTHING. So maybe let's change our behaviour? Still don't want? Well... that would mean that You more likely care about Your own opinion than update reports.

Btw. If You still think that "You PAY, YOU WANT"... read EULA. There are all the answers.

Edit. Sarcazm IS insulting, so are those "funny" motivators.

Last edited by Byku, Sun 5 Apr 2009, 12:44.

Those guys are morons :P.... LFS is one of those games which is impractical for cheaters, because we don't ban by ip but by license . So if somebody want to loose 24 pounds, go ahead. Cheat .

Quote from garph :

If anything can kill this thread then that was it.

Yeah, I hope it killed this thread, it's so damn boring, and propably also annoying to the devs .

Yeah... great idea, and if we want night/day, lights etc. in S3, using DX9 would be the only solution. We've got only one problem, only Scawen would work on that, and it might be a huge task. So... if he will decide to implement DX9, people will have to be patient .

Scawen, do Your work, and don't bother with the forum . Sure we want Scirocco , but even if some of us will leave, we'll be back with update . Go for the perfection .

It costs 21 euro per month here for that :/...

In

Nope, we would need directX 9.0 support in LFS propably, and that would need months of rewritting the engine . Maybe in the future, but not possible now.

Quote from NightShift :

LFS needs to improve, get more realistic about the setup choices but this is hardly new. It's one of those recurring issues that get discussed over and over and that the devs never seem to find the time or will to address.

Ok... i know it might be offtopic... but i want to be able to choose between adv. setup options(like now) and "realistic" ones. Why? Maybe You might disagree, BUT IT IS FUN TO MESS WITH SETTINGS! I've learned a lot about cars, basic dynamics etc. We need something like IRacing "ROOKIE" and "ADVANCE" setings, which will be enforced on servers. It's cool that Scirocco has locked setup, but still I WOULD LIKE to play with different suspension setting in SP at least. That's also one of LFS advantages! Rather to restrict those settings(and loose one of LFS advantage, and make a lot of people MOAN a lot!), we need to be able to choose between those two modes.

http://www.kegetys.net/lfs/ <-- down the site

PC is good enough? CPU especially?

Mate, i totally agree but we have only three guys working on(and only two have direct contact with graphical side of LFS) it and if i would have to choose between graphical or physical updates, i would choose the second one .

He already tried to do that ... after few weeks everything starts all over again .

To Scawen: You should program a bot who would post a new thread every few weeks which would say "WE ARE WORKING ON IT... CALM DOWN"... it might do the trick

He said so a couple of times... just go on his profile and check his last messages. Yeah, one is from the beginning of march but still. And some time ago he has posted some stuff in... hidden part of the forum ...

Oh and btw. LFS is their income... who would like to lose such a good income?

Omg... i don't care if LFS is finished or not, it's very good and it will be better(Scawen has already said that there will be future updates in this year in physics department). That counts for me. So please... stop this bs. Scawen didn't remove that alpha tag because he is a perfectionist, and he is an honest person who believes in something and sticks to it against all odds... (it sounds almost like all that Dark Knight stuff ). Guys, the fact that there is alpha tag is something that does only good for all You who have bought the game. It means there will be at least one update before LFS finish . Scawen said what needs to be done before removing alpha tag and i believe he will do it. Yeah, it won't take a month, maybe not a year even... and i don't care. 24 pounds was a deal of a lifetime. I like to be part of this community, i come here everyday, i play LFS from time to time and i've never felt that i've lost my money(like when i've bought GTA IV on pc.... , great game.... but i've played it for a month and that's it). Really... all that talk about "lfs dead", "lfs finished" etc... IT'S BORING and it serves no purpose except polluting this forum with useless threads.

AND YEAH.... if you're bored... play some other game from time to time.... and if You're playing only LFS... then DAMN! IT IS REALLY GOOD THEN, ISN'T IT? 24 pounds for the only game worth of playing. Btw. Yeah... i don't have anything else to play :P.

Quote from obsolum :

does anyone know what to put in the <car>.lfs files to change the FFB setting in the game according to the car you choose? For example in the LX6 I use 45%, while in the FZ5 I use 35%. How do I change the ingame FFB strength using a command that I can put in the <car>.lfs files?

Here i've attached my scripts, i'm using them with my G25, You can edit them however You want .

Just copy them to "scripts" in data folder in LFS.

Thx Vic

So... Victor could You answer our question? It's just curiosity. Thanks in advance

Tried Rac in slalom and though You have to drive carefully it trully drives great. Feels very nible and light. Might give it some more love in the future

But still this car seems so wild ...

Wow... i don't know if the couse of it is this add in MTV3 about LFS, but recently number of demo players have jumped from around 500 to over 800! Niceeee and those spikes are happen mostly on demo accounts .

Well... for me? IRacing is the best sim in terms of realistic behaviour of the car(but it's price is... well... too much :razz. LFS is the best in matematical physics(everythings "feels" calculated, without any const)... cars act in a natural way(couse and effect, though i know that there are problems with tyres :razz, interface is brilliant... ok... so:
1. LFS
2. IRacing(cars behave more realistic than LFS, but LFS is much better in other ways)
3. RFactor/GTR Evo
4. NEED FOR SPEED POWAH!... ok joke .

So... thank You Devs .

Try to adjust 160* FOV... then even 80 feels (really)fast, but You need to get at least 3 huge screens to see something in the front . I usually play at 90* FOV, at least i sens a little speed. To get 120* i would need at least a huge LCD TV...